Human rights groups hit out at Liam Fox for Bahrain summit

Liam Fox has been criticised by human rights groups for his decision to appear at a conference in Bahrain designed to improve the country's image.

Liam Fox has been criticised by human rights groups for his decision to appear at a conference in Bahrain designed to improve the country’s image.

The only British speaker on the bill, Fox will appear alongside US right-wingers such as former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton at the summit which takes place this weekend, set up to rally western opinion to the side of Bahrain’s monarchy.

Also taking part are the American Enterprise Institute, which lobbied aggressively for the 2003 invasion of Iraq, and the Heritage Foundation, a Reaganite thinktank that was influential during the Cold War.

According to a statement by Bahrain’s News Agency, the conference will “highlight the reform project initiated by His Majesty King Hamad bin Isa Al-Khalifa”.

“The political, economic, constitutional and judicial project of the pioneering reform project will come under the spotlight as part of efforts to project the true internal situation in Bahrain,” it adds.

Bharain’s ruling family have kept their iron grip on power despite two years of protests in which more than 60 people have died and many protesters have been given long prison sentences.

Amnesty International UK campaigns Director Tim Hancock told Left Foot Forward that “no one, least of all British politicians, ought to be under any illusions about the parlous state of human rights in Bahrain”.

Bahrain is making a mockery of its reform promises and there’s an increasing sense of unreality between what the Bahraini authorities claim and what we’re seeing on the ground. There have been bans on peaceful protests, opposition figures have had their nationalities stripped from them, and the arrests and jailings have gone on and on,” he said.

The symposium’s stated purpose is to “examine institutional developments and political reforms in Bharain [and] the challenges of empowering diverse coalitions for democratic transition and stability”.

But Nicholas McGeehan of Human Rights Watch said that British politicians and diplomats should “focus on the Bahraini authorities’ actions on reform, not their words”.

“A just settlement at the national dialogue will remain elusive until peaceful protest leaders are freed from jail and until there is accountability at the highest levels of the country’s security forces for their abusive response to the 2011 uprisings. There is no sign of movement on either issue.”

Fox, a cheerleader for the Tory Right, was criticised in 2011 for his links to the Sri Lankan government, and accused of running a “shadow foreign policy”.

As you’re here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But there’s a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the right’s hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

We’re not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isn’t free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as £1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, we’re so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

3 Responses to “Human rights groups hit out at Liam Fox for Bahrain summit”

  1. Cosmo Rana-Iozzi

    I’m sorry? What about Blair’s involvement with the Emir of Kuwait? Left Foot Forward clearly doesn’t give a damn about the Bahrainis, rather they are just playing politics at its most cynical, using something they themselves don’t even believe in.

  2. Cole

    LFF isn’t a Labour blog, so what exactly is your point?

  3. manny

    Its about time western governments admitted whats going on in Bahrain, why let these ruthless people get away with dictataship, is it because we need an army/naval/air base, I think not, you will always have a base regardless of rule, ditataship or democractic, why can’t the usa or uk see this and apply what they preach.

Comments are closed.