The blame for the downgrading of the UK's triple-A credit rating by Moody's can be laid squarely at the door of the government.
Last night leading credit ratings agency Moody’s downgraded the UK economy from AAA to Aa1.
The reasons could not have been more clear; the coalition’s ‘significant policy commitment to austerity‘ was a ‘drag‘ on the economy.
Moody’s managing director Bart Oosterveld added that:
“There is a risk, given the pace of deficit and debt reduction, that the government may not be able to reverse the debt-to-GDP trajectory before the next economic downturn happens.”
For the last 3 years the UK has been very lucky, with the financial markets, the Euro crisis and the US political instability all boosting the perception that the UK is the least ‘ugly’ country in Europe for investors.
Being a large economy with its own independent bank made the UK a safe haven compared to the Eurozone in particular. The great arrogance was this government’s belief that it was the government’s austerity policy that was producing this honeymoon period with the markets.
It wasn’t, and now we will see how wrong they were.
Almost a year ago, writing here, I contrasted the actions of the US government who, through stimulus and investment, had produced “a tangible bridge back from the abyss allowing the private sector to motor back to strong growth”.
At the same time the UK had its “bridge kicked away by an ideologically-driven assault on government by the Conservative-led coalition just when it was needed most”.
The last three years were an opportunity for the UK government to step up to the plate and help businesses. It chose not to do that.
Let us compare GDP growth from 2010 to 2012 in the UK with that of other countries. Sweden, another modern economy with a similar relationship to Europe? 11.6% growth; The embattled politically-
The mismanagement of the UK economy, driven by an ahistorical economic philosophy – try to name another time in modern history when an austerity-driven government has brought an economy out of recession – will in time ensure that this administration is seen as the most economically incompetent UK government in modern times.
For now, we can only note the missed opportunity of the past three years.
So what will the future bring?
Usually there would be a run on government bonds, but with the flood of cash to bonds from Quantitative Easing (QE), this is unlikely to happen. The currency markets are where the action is and the pound will continue, as it already has, to fall.
The real effect is that the UK’s hands are now economically tied.
Was it by chance that three days ago the Bank of England minutes showed that Sir Melvyn King was out-voted on expanding QE further: was his vote a warning? The Bank of England will not dare now push back on QE.
The great fear is inflation accompanying flat growth and again we have become powerless: would the Bank of England be brave enough to raise interest rates to combat inflation when the economy is flat-lining?
This is perhaps the saddest fact of all; we had 3 years to repair the house, fix the walls and stop the roof leaking. Instead we were busy ripping up the floorboards and tearing the plaster away.
What this government’s economic vandalism has left us with is a house that is unprotected against any future economic storm.
26 Responses to “Three years of economic vandalism that have left the UK open to this triple-A debacle”
LB
It goes back farther. It goes back to the first group who didn’t implement Beveridge, and decided to run a Ponzi instead
Seb
You’ve completely misunderstood how ratings work.
If you downgrade the rating, of course it makes sense to change the forward outlook from negative to neutral. It was negative before because there was an expectation of a downgrade. Now that that downgrade has happened, there is no longer the expectation of it. They expect it to remain at the new, downgraded rating for the forseeable future.
blarg1987
You sure their is that much debt? How much is guarentees etc? Therefore yues it is right to assume we may have to pay all of it, but it is wrong to say we have to pay all of it untill we know how much of it we can put against say investments, payments etc.
Drom that we can work out the true debt and you did say that this debt has been going on for over 30 years so logically it can be repaid although it will take a long term plan of say 30 years.
mike.g@mikeconomics.net
Credit rating agencies have lost their credibility a long time ago (Enron, Lehman, Greece…). Vince Cable shrugs off credit downgrade. And he is right! Let me take advantage to link you to my thoughts about that and more in my book (see http://www.mikeconomics.net).
Newsbot9
Except, of course, that you’re mis-reading the commentary by Moodies. Austerity has increased borrowing, not reduced it, because it’s unmitigated fiscal contraction.
Of course you’ve been fighting against growth, trying to cause wages to drop to Asian levels (while, of course, you rake off cash from living costs not declining nearly as fast, if at all). Of course you want us to get used to killing off the poor, to having a shrinking and failing economy. You’ve bet on it with your shares, after all! Keep claiming that your pork-barrel spending is a “stimulus”, when it’s counter-growth.
You are indeed GLORYING in trying to make people’s kids poorer and poorer. This is your aim, your goal – to suck up all the wealth. Keep claiming that it’s evil to have the poor, disabled and pensioners alive. Keep claiming that the post-WWII growth was a mistake. You’re…a Tory.