Breakfast clubs axed, teacher handouts…. the scandal of hungry children in our schools

A study released by Kellogg's tells us of the importance of breakfast in education, writes Fiona Twycross AM.

 

Fiona Twycross AM is a Londonwide Labour Member of the London Assembly; for details of the consultation on food poverty in London go to www.London.gov.uk

Did you eat breakfast today? If not it is probably (I hope) because you chose not to. Across Britain, thousands of children among the millions of children growing up in income poverty do not have that choice.

You would expect a cereal manufacturer to want children to eat breakfast, but Kelloggs recently published the results of a survey undertaken in August this year of 500 teachers across the UK, which demonstrated starkly why this is important.

Almost 80% of the teachers surveyed thought pupils were coming to school hungry and more than 30% of teachers had taken food in to give to children who were hungry.

Major issues associated with children not having breakfast include poor behaviour, lower educational attainment, a decrease in concentration and an increase in ill health, tiredness and lethargy. It is not rocket science to conclude breakfast clubs can contribute to making the lives of our most vulnerable children – and their long term prospects – better.

Last week, I visited a breakfast club at Woodberry Down Community School, in Hackney, as part of an investigation I am undertaking at the London Assembly into food poverty in London.

The breakfast club is run by Kerry, who attended the school herself and who commutes in from Essex. She told us a particular favourite with the children is hot tinned spaghetti and many of the children who attend the club only get hot food in school.

A brother and sister said if they don’t come to the breakfast club, they don’t get breakfast because there is no food in the house.

The school has an inspiring head teacher who described how she had seen a transformation in a group of siblings who were coming to school hungry once she persuaded their mother to send them to the breakfast club. Having been tired, lethargic and withdrawn the children were now confident and performing better.

She said, however, they are seeing a rise in poverty in the school – this means more hungry children. In order to expand their provision, the school is working with the charity Magic Breakfast as part of a project funded by the Mayor’s Fund.

This is providing additional funding for 50 breakfast clubs in the seven most deprived wards in London. This equates to just 2.5% of schools in London and across the country we are seeing, as Sharon Hodgson MP’s FOI research demonstrated, a cut to funding for foodbanks by councils.

Magic Breakfast say a third of children regularly miss breakfast and on their model – which relies partly on donated and cost price goods – it costs just 22p to feed a child at a breakfast club.

There is much debate about the changes to the education system and it is going through radical change. On the doorstep in Rotherhithe last weekend a teacher working in an inner city school described how she saw the effective dismantling of the comprehensive education service in words of one syllable.

We need to address structural issues but to do so will be meaningless unless we address the scandal of hungry children in our schools.

29 Responses to “Breakfast clubs axed, teacher handouts…. the scandal of hungry children in our schools”

  1. Newsbot9

    As usual, you’re trying to hide the fact that you’re snatching food from kids. I wasn’t proposing a scientific hypothesis, I was pointing a practical, tested piece of information.

    You’re abusing science to excuse not feeding children. It’s pathetic. And yes, I know, you think that a single anecdote is data, showing how much of a liar you are about your involvement with science.

    (Not to mention your PERCEPTION of learning | learning!)

  2. stew

    “I wasn’t proposing a scientific hypothesis, I was pointing a practical, tested piece of information.”

    and yet you fail to provide a link

  3. Newsbot9

    Newton / stewport- I have provided it, shill. You’ve rejected the evidence, as you would any evidence, because that’s what you are paid to do.

    Keep up the paid shilling!

  4. Patrick

    How do you claim to know this precisely? And furthermore, why would anybody pay someone to post comments here? Hardly anybody reads it anyway. The only person who posts with any regularity is you. It’s a ridiculous proposition.

  5. Newsbot9

    How would I know, Patrick/Newton/Stewpot? Well, it’s called blindingly obvious, given your writing style.

    And yes, that’s right, it’s ridiculous that so many dedicated /concern/ trolls would show up at the same time…thanks for backing me up.

    That you try and claim almost noone reads it (when in reality only a few comment) is typical as well. Gotta get paid, after all!

Comments are closed.