Breakfast clubs axed, teacher handouts…. the scandal of hungry children in our schools

A study released by Kellogg's tells us of the importance of breakfast in education, writes Fiona Twycross AM.

 

Fiona Twycross AM is a Londonwide Labour Member of the London Assembly; for details of the consultation on food poverty in London go to www.London.gov.uk

Did you eat breakfast today? If not it is probably (I hope) because you chose not to. Across Britain, thousands of children among the millions of children growing up in income poverty do not have that choice.

You would expect a cereal manufacturer to want children to eat breakfast, but Kelloggs recently published the results of a survey undertaken in August this year of 500 teachers across the UK, which demonstrated starkly why this is important.

Almost 80% of the teachers surveyed thought pupils were coming to school hungry and more than 30% of teachers had taken food in to give to children who were hungry.

Major issues associated with children not having breakfast include poor behaviour, lower educational attainment, a decrease in concentration and an increase in ill health, tiredness and lethargy. It is not rocket science to conclude breakfast clubs can contribute to making the lives of our most vulnerable children – and their long term prospects – better.

Last week, I visited a breakfast club at Woodberry Down Community School, in Hackney, as part of an investigation I am undertaking at the London Assembly into food poverty in London.

The breakfast club is run by Kerry, who attended the school herself and who commutes in from Essex. She told us a particular favourite with the children is hot tinned spaghetti and many of the children who attend the club only get hot food in school.

A brother and sister said if they don’t come to the breakfast club, they don’t get breakfast because there is no food in the house.

The school has an inspiring head teacher who described how she had seen a transformation in a group of siblings who were coming to school hungry once she persuaded their mother to send them to the breakfast club. Having been tired, lethargic and withdrawn the children were now confident and performing better.

She said, however, they are seeing a rise in poverty in the school – this means more hungry children. In order to expand their provision, the school is working with the charity Magic Breakfast as part of a project funded by the Mayor’s Fund.

This is providing additional funding for 50 breakfast clubs in the seven most deprived wards in London. This equates to just 2.5% of schools in London and across the country we are seeing, as Sharon Hodgson MP’s FOI research demonstrated, a cut to funding for foodbanks by councils.

Magic Breakfast say a third of children regularly miss breakfast and on their model – which relies partly on donated and cost price goods – it costs just 22p to feed a child at a breakfast club.

There is much debate about the changes to the education system and it is going through radical change. On the doorstep in Rotherhithe last weekend a teacher working in an inner city school described how she saw the effective dismantling of the comprehensive education service in words of one syllable.

We need to address structural issues but to do so will be meaningless unless we address the scandal of hungry children in our schools.

29 Responses to “Breakfast clubs axed, teacher handouts…. the scandal of hungry children in our schools”

  1. Newsbot9

    Okay, killer stewpot, who’s named himself after your aims…. How many million must die for your blood god? No evidence can sway you because what matters is you can kill off the poor, it seems. Sad.

    I’ll keep asking that. I expect I’ll keep asking across a long, time time given your apparent illiteracy.

  2. Patrick

    What we need is to stop these children being born in the first place. Their parents don’t have the skills, the means or the desire to take care of them properly. London is overpopulated with too much demand on public services. The population has grown in London by 12% in just 10 years. And answer me this: if children are really so amazing and valuable, where do all the lazy, vicious, feckless and moronic adults come from? Yes, they are the children their parents didn’t really want and couldn’t bring up properly. And it is precisely those people who are least able to take care of them that have the largest families. I know how much socialists like state control of people’s lives, so they should adopt a law to enforce maximum children in a family to two. Let’s have fewer people, but better ones.

  3. treborc1

    Why did Labour feel the need to have a breakfast club or breakfast in school, we all lived without it for years. One thing was of course was labours plan to get mothers back to work, breakfast club open in my area at 7.30 drop off your kids go to work, saves mother feeding the kids they get a piece of soggy toast or good solid sugar puffs, and a cold class of pop squash or orange juice.

    pretty god plan really so long as you have the jobs.

  4. stew

    neither of which links substantiate your point that

    “Mazlow shows that hungry kids won’t learn”

    I went to school hungry for 10 years and have a PhD in theoretical physics. That disproves either you or Mazlow

  5. Newsbot9

    Except, of course, they do both explicitly state that.

    You are lying about a doctorate, pathetic. You’re nothing but a shill, and one who has no concept of research for that matter, one who rejects science.

    Ah yes, you’re a banker.

Comments are closed.