Alex Salmond has demanded that Westminster do more to support jobs and growth
.
As David Cameron has today given an interview with the Daily Telegraph arguing that austerity will last until 2020, Alex Salmond has demanded that Westminster do more to support jobs and growth.
The Scottish first minister’s comments come following a day of mixed news for the Scottish economy. On the jobs front, the number of jobless fell by 4,000 to 215,000 between March and May.
This means that the Scottish unemployment rate is now 8%, just below the UK wide average of 8.1%.
However, in a blow to the country, figures revealed that Scotland had followed the rest of the UK into a double dip recession. Data revealed that the Scottish economy contracted by 0.1% in the first quarter of the year, fuelled by a sharp 6.9% fall in construction output.
Placing the blame squarely at the door at Number 10, Salmond declared that “the UK’s government’s austerity agenda and the prime minister’s failure to heed calls for direct investment in construction and infrastructure is hampering progress.”
He continued:
“With the full economic and financial powers of independence we could do even more to raise Scotland’s competitiveness and drive forward economic recovery.
“In the meantime the UK government must deliver substantial capital investment immediately to promote growth and jobs.”
Whilst Scottish Labour have sought to pin the blame on both Holyrood and Westminster, reaction in the Scottish press has George Osborne firmly in its sights.
At the Herald, in its editorial, whilst recognising Treasury announcements yesterday on infrastructure spending and the launch of the national loan scheme it warned:
“While all this should help to bring forward projects, it could take a year before the diggers move in and it is possible that the projects backed by government guarantee would go ahead anyway.
“By contrast the first minister’s call for direct investment in public sector projects would have the merit of getting some of his shovel-ready projects on site quickly. Mr Osborne would achieve more growth by recognising that investment in infrastructure has the double benefit of getting the economy and the country moving.”
• Delaying a decision on gay marriage could spell trouble for Salmond 18 Jul 2012
• As Yes to Independence campaign splits (again), Cameron considers taking control of Scottish referendum 9 Jul 2012
• Darling launches campaign for the Union: ‘Better Together, united not divided’ 25 Jun 2012
At the Scotsman, meanwhile, its leader has called on the Treasury to take a dose of Keynesianism economics, concluding:
“What really needs to be revisited is the UK government’s dogged adherence to a Plan A, in which the A stands for Austerity. Mr Osborne has been at pains to ensure the markets are in no doubt that he is serious about tackling the country’s debt mountain.
“But there is a growing consensus that the policy required to see off the bond traders two years ago is not the policy required now, under different international circumstances and in the absence of the green shoots of recovery that everyone hoped would now be beginning to peek through the soil.
“What the markets want to see is growth, and quickest way to growth is a cleverly targeted increase in government spending.
“Keynesianism has been a dirty word at the Treasury for two years, but circumstances change, and policy must change too. The injection of money into the economy argued for by both Labour and the SNP must happen if Scotland and Britain as a whole are to begin the slow climb back to recovery.”
Interestingly however, Professor John McLaren, of the Centre for Public Policy for Regions at the University of Glasgow argued that the figures published yesterday prove the needed for clearer economic data ahead of a referendum on independence.
Declaring that “overall, our economic prospects remain poor and the best way to improve them uncertain”, writing in the Scotsman he argues:
“Looking forward to the referendum, the current state of the economic data for Scotland remains inadequate. While we have data for the UK with and without the contribution of North Sea oil, we only have figures for Scotland without any share of North Sea oil. This situation could be easily corrected and should be.
“There is also a strong case for Scottish gross national product (GNP) to be published, as it more accurately measures the rewards from economic activity that remain within Scotland.
“Without this, the debate leading up to the referendum will be based on incomplete, possibly distorted information.”
Elsewhere, in Wales unemployment has risen to 9%, up 1.1% from the same period last year. Assessing the figures, Nick Servini BBC Wales business correspondent explains:
“Unemployment in Wales is not changing much for better or worse at the moment.
“Over the past six months it has gone up marginally three times and down the same. It has been at or above 130,000 for the past ten months, an historically high figure.
“During the pre-recession years of 2006 and 2008 that same figure stood at between 70,000 and 80,000.
“Employment has come down for the past three months, which will be worrying, but it has not reduced enough to raise major alarm bells yet.
“As you’d expect, the jobs’ market is sluggish in a double-dip recession and there is nothing to contradict that in today’s official figures for Wales.”
In Northern Ireland meanwhile, figures pointed to unemployment having risen to 6.9%, a 0.1% increase on the quarter before but down 0.2% on a year earlier.
Responding, Angela McGowan, Chief Economist at the Northern Bank is quoted in the Belfast Telegraph has having said:
“With economic stagnation and a far from dynamic labour market, unemployment levels remain remarkably resilient. However, the longer economic problems persist, the higher the chances of further job losses.”
Whilst arguing that high public sector employment in Northern Ireland had traditionally been a buffer she added:
“That safety blanket could rapidly erode if the UK coalition Government does not up its game when it comes to pulling the UK economy out of the current double-dip…
“Northern Bank forecasts suggest that unemployment in the local economy will peak at almost 64,000 claimants next year.”
35 Responses to “Alex Salmond blames Westminster for double-dip recession”
RolftheGanger
What is “right wing” in no particular order is typically:
Top down control,
Undue belief in and deference to authority figures and the established order, (Jubilee comes to mind)
A strong desire to impose uniformity, conformity and observation of rules, rules set by the established order of leadership in the society, (nanny state, Labour and Tory ‘one policy fits all, pc correctness, BBC endless drumming in the “SE knows best”)
Over readiness to resort to media brainwashing, policing, or military force, to impose their views on others who do not conform, (Murdoch – and other media barons, carefully left out of focus,;BBC used as the state propagandist,etc)
Intolerance of debate, alternative views and multiple solutions, in place of their ‘one right way’ (Any BritNat blog column contributions or Daily Mail)
The use of token ‘democracy’ to cloak the actual autocracy and and centralisation of power to the few, (H.ofLs, Westminster, now you have them now you dont referendum promises, etc)
Undue deference to symbols and the head of state, (the nauseating fawning on royalty, PM, Unionist party leaders)
Glorification of the nation, its power, influence, status etc. (Britain punching above its weight, UK on world stage, Trident, UN seat bullshit)
Expansionist, imperialist tendencies to use bullying tactics to get their way with neighboring countries, or military force against foreign interests they oppose or other countries they can invade and subdue. (Attempts to instil and maintain the dependency mindset in Scotland, contempt and abuse to Ireland and the Irish, NI, and Middle East adventurist invasions, etc etc etc)
So you see, from a Scots perspective the “right” is well and truly exemplified by the default settings of the British state – whichever major party/parties are in power.
That is why increasingly it is recognised that Scottish and EWNI values are divergent and diverging.
Federate with the above? No way!!
Anonymous
So basically, you’re blaming everyone else and refusing to look at Scotland or yourself.
Keep spitting at me for considering myself British. You’re using the Daily Fail to attack the British left…none so blind!
RolftheGanger
Setting out a set of characteristics and showing that they can be seen to align with aspects of the current British constitution and political system is an argument. Not a piece of blame.
Blame is an emotive term. IT shifts focus away from the formality. Citizens have the right to hold those exercising power and control on their behalf to account. So the correct term is accountability.
Those who have held that power and control over the main levelrs of economic policy, taxation, expenditure and social and other policies have been governments at Westminster. That is a fact. Attempting to slide out from under that accountability by blame-shifting to the victim of their policies is a despicable piece of sophistry.
One can hold governments to account to the extent and limit of the powers they exercise, or exercised. However, since one cannot change ther past it is mostly pointless to engage in blame – which can be defined as a judgmental negative exercise of self righteous, self justifying hindsight.
You posit a false dichotomy. An uncertain future if Scotland returns to self government. Versus an assumed ‘certainty’ if in the Union. That is simply false. Who knows what further catastrophes Westmister incompetence, wrongheadedness and fixation with past glories will visit on Scotland if unwise enough to stay in a dysfunctional Union. The track record prompts me to choose self government.
Anonymous
No, it’s not false to point out that the SNP are demanding a blank cheque. You can’t be honest about this can you?
You seem determined to ban certain words from the debate, too. Why are you so scared of free debate? And yes, your blaming the British left for the daily mail is absolutely despicable.
RolftheGanger
Perhaps if you clarified the emotive and very non-enlightening bit about a ‘blank cheque’ – on what?, from whom? in what way? a response will be possible.
Not banning anything – no power to do so. Defining from another viewpoint is not banning.
I suppose one could hold the purchasers accountable for the continued existence of the Daily Mail, et al but not the society other than from a Marxist interpretation of societal symptoms perhaps?
Also we may need to start another heading or vanish off the page to the right!
Perish the thought!