Several Conservative MPs have expressed serious concerns at George Osborne's apparent “disproportionate obsession” with Ed Balls.
.
As the dust settles on yesterday’s raucous, oft undignified bar room brawl-esque scenes in the Commons chamber during the banking inquiry debate, several Conservative MPs have expressed serious concerns at George Osborne’s “disproportionate obsession” with his opposite number.
Earlier this week, the chancellor, in an explosive interview with the Spectator, accused Ed Balls of complicity in the Libor scandal, saying he has “questions to answer”. Yesterday, Osborne said the shadow chancellor had “smeared his way through 13 years of Labour government”. Now, though, it is him in the firing line – from his own side as well as Labour.
Today’s Times reports (£):
One Tory said Mr Osborne’s obsession with Mr Balls and ‘Whitehall sources’ was a ‘red herring.’’ They added: “There was no smoking gun.”
Another worried about his priorities: “People want us to sort out the effing banks, not worry about what Ed Balls might have said four years ago.”
Another suggested Mr Osborne should spend more time in the Treasury: “When are we going to get a chancellor who is not part time? You can’t run the sixth largest economy in the world with a mate-ocracy.”
Andrea Leadsom, a member of the Commons Treasury select committee, said the name-calling was “a great shame”. She added: “I don’t think it’s helpful.”
Bernard Jenkin, chair of the Public Administration Select Committee, said: “I have to say to both front benches, this has not been the House of Commons’ finest hour.”
In the Telegraph, Fraser Nelson calls the battle between Balls and Osborne as “a fight to the death… the question of who is to blame for the Libor interest-rate scandal will be front and centre at the next general election”.
• Calls grow for an independent banking inquiry, after MPs give Diamond easy ride 5 Jul 2012
• Inside the world of the bankers… This is why we need a full inquiry 4 Jul 2012
• Leslie: ‘Frenzied Osborne throwing around false allegations and demeaning his office’ 4 Jul 2012
• Miliband attacks “slow to act, bankrolled by the banks” Cameron at PMQs 4 Jul 2012
• Balls: ‘I’d be very happy to appear at an inquiry… Why are ministers so worried by one?’ 4 Jul 2012
Reflecting on yesterday’s debate, meanwhile, the Telegraph’s Michael Deacon describes how a “venomous, slithering” chancellor “ambushed his prey”; the Guardian’s Caroline Davies compares it to Ali v Frazier, “for sheer pugilistic spectacle, for mutual enmity and for knuckle-bruising brutality”; and the Indy’s Simon Carr likens it to “medieval football… whole villages turning out to fight over a ball, losing the ball and just fighting”.
Osborne may have won yesterday’s Commons vote, but, if he isn’t careful, may end up losing his credibility, competence, and the next election.
45 Responses to “Tory MPs unnerved by Osborne’s “disproportionate obsession” with Balls”
gareth evans
Tory MPs unnerved by Osborne's “disproportionate obsession” with Balls: http://t.co/eiD3yWfH by @ShamikDas #Libor
Shamik Das
Excellent article by @ShamikDas http://t.co/69n0NtFL on yesterday's 'dies horribilis' for Osborne.
Anonymous
Game? Yes, you’re trying to game away the fact that the Tories called for less regulation.
Look Left – Libor, banks, inquiries, Osborne... and Cameron’s broken NHS pledge | Left Foot Forward
[…] the end, following a rancorous debate in the Commons on Thursday, with Ed Balls and George Osborne trading blow after blow after […]
Tory MP: Osborne has "obviously made a mistake" and "he should apologise to Balls" | Left Foot Forward
[…] comments follow the the chancellor’s interview in the Spectator and the rowdy scenes during last Thursday’s Commons debate on what form an inquiry into banking should take. Late […]