Republican efforts to kill Obamacare with repeal bills are amounting to nothing, but it's not for want of support from America's most strident news outlet.
.
Fox News has always been strong on self-parody. While the Murdoch-owned cable outlet’s aggressively pro-Republican stance has been notorious for years, it has always employed the slogan ‘fair and balanced’, and called on its viewers to “say no to biased media, and yes to fair play and free speech” upon launching a new website in 2009.
Fox’s latest gem is truly worthy of abridged transcription. In the days and weeks after the Supreme Court upheld Barack Obama’s healthcare reforms, the Republican-held House of Representatives has attempted to repeal the legislation on more than thirty occasions, most recently on Wednesday. Since the Democrats hold the Senate, each attempt has come to nought.
Yesterday, Wisconsin Republican Paul Ryan – possibly the closest the GOP has to a policy wonk – appeared on Fox’s early morning show, anchored by Steve Doocy and Gretchen Carlson. Ryan’s goal was to remind viewers that November’s elections represent their last chance to kill ‘Obamacare’.
What followed, with the two anchors competing to out-bias one another, was pure hilarity:
Some highlights:
Responding to Ryan’s contention that “if Congress knew then was Congress knows now, this law would never have passed”, Doocy soliloquied thus:
“Something the President of the United States is not going to talk about out on the stump is his signature achievement, and that’s passing healthcare, because it is wildly unpopular by a majority of people in this country. And instead, since he can’t run on his record, he’s got to throw stuff out like the ‘War on Women’ and the dog stuff…and now, once again, it’s that class warfare thing where he wants to jack up taxes on the most successful people in the country, the small businesses, the job creators, even though he knows there is no chance it’s going to pass.”
Subsequently, Carlson chipped in:
“[Obama’s] hoping that voters do not read the fine print when they put out some of these headline statements, and then the retractions come at the bottom of the page a short time later.”
• ‘Obamacare’ judgement: A good day for America 29 Jun 2012
• Supreme Court ‘Obamacare’ judgement: Where does it leave America now? 28 Jun 2012
• If Britons elected the US president, it’d be a landslide for Obama 13 Jun 2012
• Super Tuesday continues Republican death spiral towards November presidential elections 7 Mar 2012
• Obama’s playing against a weak field, but it’ll never be as bad as last time 21 Feb 2012
Ultimately, Doocy took the Krispy Kreme biscuit with this loaded question of loaded questions:
“Congressman, do you sometimes feel that you went to Washington to change things, get stuff done, and now you guys are just spinning your wheels, because you pass bills – you repealed Obamacare yesterday – you send it over to Harry Reid, and he’s got a big pile of stuff you already sent him. He’s not going to do a darn thing with it.”
Fox News: Fair and balanced.
Left Foot Forward doesn't have the backing of big business or billionaires. We rely on the kind and generous support of ordinary people like you.
You can support hard-hitting journalism that holds the right to account, provides a forum for debate among progressives, and covers the stories the rest of the media ignore. Donate today.
34 Responses to “Fox News: Fair and balanced (occasional series)”
Alexander Wallace
As put my someone far more eloquent and informed than I am:
http://www.newstatesman.com/uk-politics/2009/08/mehdi-hasan-bbc-wing-bias-corporation
Selohesra
nothing like the risk reports which Burnham/Labour did not want released when they were in power. One is a devil’s advocate type analysis which you would want to be prepared but not misquoted/abused by lazy opportunistic politicians whatever the colour of opposition. The other a report into the propaganda pushed on us by our state funded broadcaster which was done for the express purpose of determining whether BBC were in breach of their obligations to us.
Selohesra
Don’t be so quick to dismiss Balen – a BBC commissioned report which they hoped would be a bit of a hitewash over their failure to be impartial. It wasn’t to they hushed it up. Our state broadcaster, funded by us, deceiving the country – it may be what you ant but not me.
if you want some examples why not visit http://www.biased-bbc.com. Some bits a bit wacky but some quite serious examples especially against Isreal
Appologies if hese seems duplicate – but i replied earlier and it seems to have dropped off – although my onnection has been bit iffy today
Blarg1987
The most simple and logical way to determine if the BBcis bias is to look at news reports over the history of it and see if they have become bias or not.
The thing people say is, the BBC has become more bias, no one seems to ask is, as a nation have we become more left wing or right wing on our views that groups like the BBC have stayed where they are?
So how about people who maon the BBC is left wing or right wing, go through old news items and compare them like for like as well as other media outlets to see if their stance really has changed or if it is just peoples opnion, whcih has been influenced by other media.