The new “Who Funds You?” website, launched today, reveals left-leaning think tanks are more open transparent thank their right-wing counterparts.
.
The new “Who Funds You?” website, launched today, reveals left-leaning think tanks are more open transparent thank their right-wing counterparts.
It asked 20 leading UK-based think tanks and political campaigns to disclose their major funders and rated them on the depth of their responses – as Figure 1 shows, the contrast between organisations of the left (red points) and right (blue points) is stark.
Figure 1 (yellow points denote groups of the centre):
Who Funds You? awarded six organisations an A rating (for a score of 35 or above), Compass, IPPR, nef, Progress, Resolution Foundation and Social Market Foundation, while three organisations received nul points, Adam Smith Institute, ResPublica and TaxPayers’ Alliance.
Clifford Singer, co-founder of the project, said it was “refreshing” an increasing number of think tanks and campaigns taking funding transparency seriously, and described himself as “really pleased” four of the 20 organisations they rated – nef, Progress, SMF and the Fabians – have placed funding information on their own websites since being approached.
He added of those at the wrong end of the transparency spectrum:
“Seven of the organisations we approached are languishing in our D and E streams. Those who received a D rating revealed nothing beyond the size of their annual income, while those rated E won’t even disclose that…
“At their best, think tanks and public policy campaigns make a valuable contribution to political life, generating new ideas and producing important research. At their worst, they can provide a neutral front while actually working on behalf of vested interests.
“The issue is not whether they should take this money, but that people can make up their own minds about whether this might influence their work. As organisations that exert influence on public life, it is right that we call think tanks to account and ask for a basic level of transparency.
“As think tanks increasingly take an important role in formulating government policy, it is important for a strong democracy that they are open about their own agenda and where their funding comes from.”
• Government’s “quantum leap” in transparency takes us in the wrong direction – Oh Boy 14 Feb 2012
• Public sector outsourcing is a mess – and it’s the taxpayer picking up the tab 10 Feb 2012
• The government’s ‘transparency’ is clear as mud 23 Jan 2012
• Coalition must match rhetoric with action on transparency 24 Aug 2011
• Government rhetoric on transparency doesn’t match the reality 7 Apr 2011
Who Funds You? is calling for other think tanks and political campaigns with a strong public policy or research focus to disclose funders who give £5,000 or more in a single year, and will give a funding transparency award to those that do. Having rated 20 general political think tanks and campaigns, it will now look at those working in particular policy areas.
The project is independent, non-partisan and run by a small team of volunteers. It has so far received no funding, though may seek funding to expand in the future.
You can find out more about Left Foot Forward’s funders on our About page; let’s hope the opaque, bottom-rated right-wing organs the Adam Smith Institute, Centre for Policy Studies, Centre for Social Justice, Institute of Economic Affairs, Policy Exchange, ResPublica and TaxPayers’ Alliance are shamed into listing some of their donors, sooner rather than later.
51 Responses to “Right-wing think tanks much less transparent than left-wing organisations”
Anonymous
Yes, thanks for highlighting your fraud. Won’t pay, period.
Anonymous
So you don’t think knowing who’s funding research used to justify policies is important. I see.
Unsurprised!
Blarg1987
If you go to a doctor and he tells you you need to take a pill which he has a vested interest in selling to you to be healthy would you believe and trust him 100% on his diagnosis?
These things are important as to not know the motive of groups makes their evidence hard to judge, several groups have been discovered to write very poor policy reports only to line the pockets of ther funders, but people have believed the reports outright without looking into the poor detail. This has cost tax payers money and society services and contributed a large chunk to the economic problems we face.
JC
Interesting. I ask a question and get attacked. Is someone hiding something. Now I suppose someone will be re-interpreting my comments to show that I am a dirty lying fascist.
These are think tanks, some funded by taxpayers tax, others funded by taxpayers left over money. Do we have a choice on which ones are funded by our tax? If not, how “open” is that?
I repeat, where’s Murphy in this. Blarg1287 makes the point quite eloquently.
Anonymous
No, you were not attacked. I made a statement that I’m unsurprised you have no problem with rich people and companies buying policies.
Thanks for the statement you’re a “dirty lying fascist” though, for the record.
When think tanks are funded with taxpayer cash it’s to produce studies. No, you have no more choice in that than in any other aspect of paying tax. Of course, you don’t…