The Houla massacre of 32 children is so unimaginably evil it’s time for Western liberal military intervention in Syria to take out President Bashar al-Assad.
.
A picture is worth a thousand words, so the saying goes.
How many words, then, can describe the shocking, sickening images we’ve seen across our weekend papers and TV screens of the corpses of children and adults, lined up one by one in the Syrian town of Houla, and of families screaming in agony.
I was left feeling particularly sick to my stomach after seeing an extremely graphic video of some of the 32 children massacred – be warned, this footage is truly unimaginable:
In his description for the Independent on Sunday, Patrick Cockburn wrote:
“Horrific pictures posted on YouTube appear to show that they were shot or knifed to death, some having their throats cut.
“The small bodies of the children were covered in sheets as they were taken by survivors screaming in grief and disbelief from the houses where they had been murdered.”
It is well over a year now since we began to see the uprising in Syria, responded to with brute force by the government of President Assad.
It is clear the peace plan agreed by the former UN Secretary General, Kofi Annan, is now in tatters. Peace was given a chance and so it is now time the international community realised its responsibility and took the military action that is so badly needed to bring Assad and his murderous regime to an end.
This does not come naturally to me. I was sceptical to say the least about the Iraq War and I have no doubt many eminently more qualified people will argue action of this nature would serve to enrage the likes of Iran but I pose this simple case – how many more of these massacres can we bear to watch before we take action?
Had we taken action before this weekend, how many of those 32 children would be alive rather than buried deep underground?
• Syria: Massacre of the innocents 27 May 2012
• Amidst the burning flesh of Homs, Syrians plead: “We are getting slaughtered, save us” 7 Feb 2012
• Anti-Assad activist: “We need help… We need a no-fly zone… ASAP” 1 Feb 2012
• Syria: When will the West act? 2 Jan 2012
• Syrian government uses hospitals against protesters 25 Oct 2011
• Exposed: The pro-Assad useful idiots in our midst 22 Oct 2011
• Syria, where innocence is no defence 1 Jun 2011
The UN has itself stated it has a “responsibility to protect”. Now is the time to stop the talking and take tangible action to rid Syria of a regime perpetrating sickening acts of barbarity; the international community must uphold the basic universal right to life.
Thirty two children lost their lives over the weekend: how many more must die before we act?
44 Responses to “We can’t sit back and allow more massacres: It’s time for military action in Syria”
Samppalainen
“A picture is worth a thousand words, so the saying goes.
How many words, then, can describe the shocking, sickening images we’ve seen across our weekend papers and TV screens of the corpses of children and adults, lined up one by one in the Syrian town of Houla, and of families screaming in agony.”
This is example how even BBC is using pictures to proof what ever they want to proof:
http://static.prisonplanet.com/p/images/may2012/280512shot1.jpg
Paul L
We can’t sit back and allow more massacres: It’s time for military action in #Syria http://t.co/EiHBob4a #Massacre
Pad1
Do you sheep even know if it was syrian troops that carried out this masacre or do you just spout government propaganda at every oportunity.
Wake up and see whats realy going on and you will find out there is more to this story than fuckwits like hague are telling us.
norrie
RT @leftfootfwd: We can’t sit back and allow more massacres: It’s time for military action in Syria http://t.co/SvOQ4Trb
Whittaker David
Gerard how can you mount an argument as to supporting military action in Syria if you can’t even hazard a guess at the casualties that could be involved. In other words your prepared to send in troops be them NATO or the Libyan mercenaries that are being trained up by the US in Turkey (paid for by the Saudis) to protect innocent civilians not knowing if those actions could cause more civilian deaths?
Yes we do have the power to do something and that’s using non violent methods, it might not be as instant which obviously won’t appeal to the Sky News viewing crowd but in the long term could save far more lives.