We can’t sit back and allow more massacres: It’s time for military action in Syria

The Houla massacre of 32 children is so unimaginably evil it’s time for Western liberal military intervention in Syria to take out President Bashar al-Assad.

E-mail-sign-up Donate

 

.

A picture is worth a thousand words, so the saying goes.

How many words, then, can describe the shocking, sickening images we’ve seen across our weekend papers and TV screens of the corpses of children and adults, lined up one by one in the Syrian town of Houla, and of families screaming in agony.

Syria-Houla-massacre-of-children
I was left feeling particularly sick to my stomach after seeing an extremely graphic video of some of the 32 children massacred – be warned, this footage is truly unimaginable:

In his description for the Independent on Sunday, Patrick Cockburn wrote:

Horrific pictures posted on YouTube appear to show that they were shot or knifed to death, some having their throats cut.

“The small bodies of the children were covered in sheets as they were taken by survivors screaming in grief and disbelief from the houses where they had been murdered.”

It is well over a year now since we began to see the uprising in Syria, responded to with brute force by the government of President Assad.

It is clear the peace plan agreed by the former UN Secretary General, Kofi Annan, is now in tatters. Peace was given a chance and so it is now time the international community realised its responsibility and took the military action that is so badly needed to bring Assad and his murderous regime to an end.

This does not come naturally to me. I was sceptical to say the least about the Iraq War and I have no doubt many eminently more qualified people will argue action of this nature would serve to enrage the likes of Iran but I pose this simple case – how many more of these massacres can we bear to watch before we take action?

Had we taken action before this weekend, how many of those 32 children would be alive rather than buried deep underground?

 


See also:

Syria: Massacre of the innocents 27 May 2012

Amidst the burning flesh of Homs, Syrians plead: “We are getting slaughtered, save us” 7 Feb 2012

Anti-Assad activist: “We need help… We need a no-fly zone… ASAP” 1 Feb 2012

Syria: When will the West act? 2 Jan 2012

Syrian government uses hospitals against protesters 25 Oct 2011

Exposed: The pro-Assad useful idiots in our midst 22 Oct 2011

Syria, where innocence is no defence 1 Jun 2011


 

The UN has itself stated it has a “responsibility to protect”. Now is the time to stop the talking and take tangible action to rid Syria of a regime perpetrating sickening acts of barbarity; the international community must uphold the basic universal right to life.

Thirty two children lost their lives over the weekend: how many more must die before we act?

 


Sign-up to our weekly email • Donate to Left Foot Forward

44 Responses to “We can’t sit back and allow more massacres: It’s time for military action in Syria”

  1. Edwards_labour

    As I note in the piece I did not support the Iraq War. What else, other than military intervention can the world do to bring the brutal killings to an end. It’s not about Weapons of Mass destruction or oil. It’s about preventing a Government from slaughtering it’s people.

  2. Gerard

    Banning trade wouldn’t stop the killing. The people of Syria who are trying to rise up against their rulers will not sit back and accept the end of the slaughter with a simple ‘thanks for that’. No, the Syrian government have committed crimes that the people of that country won’t easily forget. So even if the attacks stopped on the part of the government, the people who protest will still be determined to overthrow their government and so the government will fight back. Yes ceasing trade would weaken the economy of the country but the people are not fighting over money but over democracy (or the lack of).

    I’m no military expert and so I would not be so foolish to give ‘ball park figures’ on deaths. I suspect even military experts wouldn’t do so either.

    What I have learned from history is that waiting can be just as unforgivable as rushing in. It’s not an easy decision for anyone to make, to send our troops off to protect people they’ve never met, but it also can’t be easy to sit back and watch a slaughter and do nothing when we have the power to do something.

    If you’re 10 and see a 7 yr old hitting a 5 yr old – do you step in to stop the bully or just continue to play?

  3. Anonymous

    “Upset the banks”?

    Is that what you call collapsing the economy onto the poor? It can’t and won’t happen. Meanwhile, Syria operates on the Hama Rules and you campaign against using substantive action against them.

  4. Anonymous

    …Recessions kill people.

  5. Anonymous

    This.

    Yes, we need to be better at building peaces. But that doesn’t excuse not taking action against the very dictators the West were responsible over the last century for setting up in power in the first place.

Comments are closed.