Evidence shows students from state schools are more likely to achieve a first-class degree at Oxford University than students from independent schools.
.
Jonathan Clifton is a research fellow at the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR)
Evidence shows that, based on similar GCSE grades, students from state schools are more likely to achieve a first-class degree at Oxford University than students from independent schools, yet top universities are still favouring the students from privileged backgrounds.
Speaking earlier this week, Nick Clegg criticised universities for not accepting enough pupils from state schools. Renewing his social mobility strategy, Clegg announced that universities will be penalised if they fail to meet targets for increasing the proportion of pupils they admit from disadvantaged backgrounds.
This proposal was greeted with a predictable response from independent schools, who argued that the government is engaged in “old style communist tactics” of social engineering, and that it should focus on improving state education “rather than capping the achievements of pupils in independent schools”. On a similar note, the CPS argued that “Britain can’t afford to drag down its best schools in the name of equality”.
Before trotting out such arguments, these commentators would do well to take a look at this graph from Tom Ogg and his colleagues – it shows the probability of getting a first at Oxford University based on GCSE grades:
It shows that pupils from state schools are more likely to get a first class degree than pupils from independent schools with the same GCSE grades. The question then becomes: why are universities selecting those students who are less likely to get a First? Why are they not admitting students on the basis of their potential to succeed?
• Left-wing snobbery does state schools no favours 15 May 2012
• Subject choice plummets across the UK as the government fails universities 23 Feb 2012
• Cameron needs to start backing our young people and universities 18 Jan 2012
As Jonathan Portes points out in this excellent blog, this shows there is indeed social engineering in our education system – but it works in favour of those from independent schools:
“What the data and evidence suggest is that Oxford is already engaging in ‘social engineering’ in favour of private school pupils. It has an admissions process that favours them and admits them even though they are less likely to get good degrees.”
So long as this fact holds true, Nick Clegg’s focus on university admissions will be justified.
49 Responses to “State school students more likely to achieve a First at Oxford than independent schoolers”
Sarah Mulley
.@jp_clifton @IPPR: Oxbridge can't say over-representation of private schooled is on merit-state schooled get more 1sts http://t.co/2YZTI3ye
Paul Stanistreet
RT @leftfootfwd: State school students more likely to achieve a First at Oxford than independent schoolers http://t.co/niYNFvRF
Jonathan Clifton
State school kids doing better at Oxford, but universities still favour independent schools. My blog: http://t.co/V6lwVwTe
Julian
You are suggesting that state school GCSE grades are given more weight in university application than independent school grades. That may be ok on average but this is just an average. Someone getting a B grade at a poor state school may well be Oxbridge material but someone getting a B at a good state school will not be. The only answer is to make the GCSE an accurate assessment of a pupil’s ability and potential, not to try to compensate poorly for the fact that it is not. That can only be done by “focusing on improving state school education”, which you disparage.
Stuart Rodger
State school kids doing better at Oxford, but universities still favour independent schools, by @jp_clifton http://t.co/APg27T3T