Adonis: There’s a “state of warfare” between Number 10 and Whitehall

Labour’s new advisor to the party's policy review on industrial strategy, Lord Adonis, tells Heather Spurr all is not well between Downing Street and Whitehall.

E-mail-sign-up Donate

 

.

Labour’s new advisor to the party’s policy review on industrial strategy, Lord Adonis, tells Heather Spurr all is not well between Downing Street and the mandarins

Lord Adonis this week warned Number 10 is in a “state of warfare” with Whitehall, just weeks before sweeping civil service reforms are announced by the government.

Lord-AdonisAdonis, appointed Labour’s industrial strategy adviser last week, said the government was becoming “deeply unpopular” in Whitehall because of its “anti-civil service rhetoric”, while ministers felt a “deep sense of frustration” with public officials.

The coalition is expected to announce far-reaching reforms to the civil service within the next month. It follows reports David Cameron’s former chief adviser Steve Hilton wanted to slash the number of civil servants by 90 per cent.

Adonis said:

“It’s not a good idea to have a state of warfare between the government and the civil service – which appears to be happening at the moment…

“The government is becoming deeply unpopular in Whitehall by its anti-civil service rhetoric and I deeply regret that because it’s possible to be in favour of civil service efficiency whilst also supporting the professionalism of the civil service.

“I deeply regret the attacks on civil service moral which are taking place at the moment. I don’t quite understand it either because at the end of the day, if the government wants its programme delivered, they need the civil service because no one else is going to do it.”

Until last January, the former transport secretary was head the Institute for Government, which seeks to improve efficiency in the civil service.

 


See also:

Top civil servant accused of being “SNP lacky” 4 May 2012

Forget Sugar, listen to Adonis – a man who knows a thing about transport 19 Apr 2012

Civil service complacency on black applicants is not good enough 17 Dec 2010


 

When asked why he thought hostility exists between Whitehall officials and government, Adonis answered:

“There is clearly a deep sense of frustration about how things are going in Whitehall at the moment – which the government holds. I don’t think it’s justified. I was a minister for five years, I worked in Whitehall for 12 and I was constantly impressed by the professionalism of the civil service.

“There’s a need to improve efficiency and that is taking place – but I’’s all the more important when you’re improving efficiency that you support the integrity and the professionalism of one of the best administrative systems in the world.”

Damaging civil service moral would have a negative impact on Whitehall, Adonis added, explaining the government “needs to demonstrate” further cuts “are not going to harm essential public services”.

Earlier this month, the Telegraph revealed civil servants will be “rated” on their performance at work as government ministers, from the prime minister down, grow increasingly frustrated with institutional failures.

 


Sign-up to our weekly email • Donate to Left Foot Forward

34 Responses to “Adonis: There’s a “state of warfare” between Number 10 and Whitehall”

  1. TheMoronMormon

    Superb Article – Didn’t Cameron’s Outgoing Chief Adviser / Austerity Worshiper Steve Hilton Want To Cut the Civil Service By A ‘Mere’ 70% Not 90& As Your Article States? >>> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/9275702/Revealed-Civil-servants-get-extra-three-days-holiday-if-they-work-over-36-hours-a-week.html

  2. Mr. Sensible

    Well said, Newsbot9. The government often tries to compare the government budget to a household budget, but it does not work like that.

  3. BevR

    RT @leftfootfwd: Adonis: There’s a “state of warfare” between Number 10 and Whitehall http://t.co/BIZd12hy

  4. Lord Blagger

    It does with one exception. They can always try printing cash. Doesn’t solve the pensions mess because they are linked to inflation. Print cash or QE, its the same thing and you hit some people who are forced to lend to government, but the other debts don’t go away.

    Since they are so large, [Prediction, you won’t list the debts and their sizes], its still going bust.

    e.g. 2 years on retirement age = 20,000 quid from a median wage earner. Stolen

Comments are closed.