Ed Miliband will today seek to portray the Tories as the party of the few, helping bankers, millionaires and Murdoch while doing nothing for everyone else.
.
Ed Miliband will today once again seek to portray the Tories as the party of the few, going out of their way to help bankers, millionaires and Rupert Murdoch but doing sweet FA for the un-rich; the government has “helped those who don’t need help”, he will say, “but it has not helped you”.
Miliband will be speaking at a South Bank community centre ahead of a last-minute tour of key local election battlegrounds. As well as reflecting on the state of the economy and the fallout from the latest Leveson revelations, he will outline Labour’s priorities for next week’s Queen’s Speech, including a finance bill, energy bill, transport bill, consumer bill and jobs bill.
The Labour leader will say:
“Last week we found out that Britain’s economy, which had been recovering strongly two years ago, has now sunk into a double dip recession. A recession made in Downing Street.
“David Cameron and George Osborne promised they would change things for the better. They boasted they had taken the economy out of the danger zone. They ignored the warning signs that their reckless plan would backfire.
“David Cameron and George Osborne have helped the bankers who wanted their big bonuses. They have helped the millionaires who wanted a tax cut worth tens of thousands of pounds in the Budget. They tried to help Rupert Murdoch secure his biggest ever deal.
“This Tory-led government, with its Liberal Democrat prop, has helped those who don’t need help. But it has not helped you.”
Describing the government as “too close to the rich and powerful, out of touch with everyone else”, he will add:
“Millions in the middle are being forced to pay more in tax. Pensioners are being forced to pay more in tax. There is even a new tax that will hurt charities.
“Families are losing their working tax credits making some of them better off on benefit. Cuts that go too far and too fast in services mean there are less police, our NHS is suffering and we now have more than one million young people out of work.
“In these tough times when there is less money around, only one party has an agenda for change which would improve living standards for families, ensure security for pensioners and get our young people back to work. That party is Labour.”
• Krugman: “Keynesians have been completely right, Austerians utterly wrong” 26 Apr 2012
• Osborne’s ideology-driven economics have failed: We’re all paying the price 25 Apr 2012
• UK double-dips for first time in 37 years; Balls: Government’s economic credibility “in tatters” 25 Apr 2012
• Miliband plays it down the middle at Labour’s not-so-local election launch 2 Apr 2012
• Vote 2012: An introduction to the various elections on May 3rd 17 Mar 2012
The five Labour priorities for the Queen’s Speech Miliband will announce are:
• A Fair Deal on tax. Alongside the five-point plan for jobs and growth, a finance bill would that reverse tax cuts for people earning more than £150,000 a year, using the money to help pensioners on fixed incomes hit by the “granny tax” and restoring cuts in tax credits.
• A Fair Deal on Energy. An energy bill to break up the dominance of the ‘Big Six’ power companies and require them by law to offer 4 million elderly people the lowest rate available.
• A Fair Deal on Transport. A transport bill to stop train operators raising fares by greater than inflation plus one per cent, stop them exploiting commuters with unadvertised rates, and give local authorities more control over bus firms.
• A Fair Deal for Consumers. A consumer bill giving new powers to the Financial Conduct Authority and Competition and Markets Authority to stop rip-off surcharges by banks, low-cost airlines and pension firms.
• A Fair Deal on Jobs. A jobs bill to ensure some of the money raised from a tax on bank bonuses is used to provide real jobs, with real wages and responsibilities, to more than 100,000 young people aged 18-24.
Yesterday, shadow chancellor Ed Balls, who will appear alongside Miliband this morning, warned a “lost decade” for the UK economy loomed unless Osborne saw sense and changed course.
He told the Observer Japanese-style stagflation could take hold in Britain without a plan for jobs and growth, that the economy could dip in and out of recession for a “very long time”, as happened in Japan from the early 1990s.
40 Responses to “Miliband: Cameron and Osborne ‘have helped bankers, millionaires and Murdoch’”
Anonymous
Of course close down the NHS and end free schooling. JC is talking about slashing a good third and more of the tax take there! I can recognise the hymn sheet he’s singing from.
Moreover, that unions being responsible for the state of schooling is outright propaganda – it’s government who have repeatedly ignored teachers and Universities and over-tested.
Ask any decent University tutor, and they’ll tell you the same thing. Schools don’t have time to teach anything BUT memorisation…even your Tories have realised this are are handing the A-levels over to Universities to reform now!
Evidence-based teaching is precisely what the Unions have been pushing for…
But on the topic of tax yes – If income other than wages were taxed properly, a 40% top rate would be more than sufficient. If you combined the exemptions into a single rate, that would achieve one of your goals (lifting some marginally poor out of tax, and giving the middle class a tax break) as well.
“extra high rates on the sale of second properties”
Mm. I’d rather discourage buy-to-let in general, and that’s one of the effects of a rent cap. Stamp duty is a bit of a problem, since it’s suppressing the already low volume of houses being sold – I’d look at discounting it for houses built to energy-efficient standards.
(Hence encouraging investing in upgrading the energy efficiency of the housing stock, something I think you’ll agree is worth doing!)
cameronsfollys
#Miliband: #Cameron and #Osborne ‘have helped bankers, millionaires and #Murdoch’ http://t.co/ibQMadSQ [And.. what would Ed have done? Hmm?]
Ed's Talking Balls
I agree that schools are more like conveyor belts than places of education nowadays. A sad state of affairs which governments of all hues have encouraged for too long. Although he’s one of the left’s favourite bogeymen, I do genuinely believe Gove wants to address this. Whether he will do so successfully, however, is another matter.
I know that it’s not purely the teachers’ fault, but I remember coming across some dross which teaching unions seem to claim doesn’t exist. It’s too difficult to remove a poor teacher. I can’t think of a comparable profession in this regard: I stand by my comment that mediocrity is tolerated too much across the board in education.
I don’t know how a rent cap would work though. It’d require something pretty drastic, to tell people they can’t charge what someone else is willing to pay. I’d be interested to see how it could work/whether it could.
I still think there’s something in the idea of heavy taxes on second properties. Give people the message that investment is good, responsible even, but investing in other things (companies, for example) is preferable.
As regards stamp duty, I’d leave the lower rates well alone – I agree on that. I don’t know about the really big stuff, though. If we’re going to allow oligarchs to buy up streets of insanely expensive houses in London, we might as well milk them for it.
It might be a good idea to look into discounting energy-efficient housing. You’re right, I do see the sense in that.
(Long reply, and sorry for those too bored to read!)
Anonymous
A “poor teacher” in that parlance is one who isn’t able to forget modern education theories and relentlessly drill memorisation.
The entire “mediocrity” comes from above! The proposals being mooted, which reduce employment protection (and which would be used as a crowbar to move closer towards right to fire) on the basis of no more than “I don’t like you, goodbye” on the part of the head teacher…
And the rent cap would work like it does in any number of other countries, including quite a few major American cities. Really, it’s hardly an unknown concept!
Iain Hill
Miliband is surely a millionaire?