New report reveals “devastating evidence of systemic fraud within A4e”

A leaked internal A4e document has revealed evidence of “systemic fraud” at the company, BBC Newsnight’s Paul Mason revealed tonight.

E-mail-sign-up Donate

 

.

A leaked internal A4e document has revealed evidence of “systemic fraud” at the company. The document, obtained by the BBC, shows A4e staff “claiming for putting people into jobs which did not exist, jobs which did not qualify for payment and fabricating paperwork”.

A4e-Emma-Harrison
Margaret Hodge MP, chair of the House of Commons public accounts committee, said of the audit:

“This appears to be devastating evidence of systemic fraud within A4e. Either A4e failed to act or to inform DWP, or they did inform DWP and the department failed to investigate properly. Whichever, it is completely unacceptable. Once again, I am urging the department to suspend all its contracts with A4e immediately.”

The document was obtained by BBC Newsnight’s Paul Mason, who will report fully the latest developments on tonight’s programme; earlier this evening, he said:

“We’ve obtained a draft internal audit report which suggests widespread potential fraud and irregular activity, activity among, across numerous offices, and, crucially, the report warns of quotes “systematic failure to mitigate risk in relation to fraud and irregularity”. It further warns that management’s knowledge of whether its controls against fraud were working were quotes “minimal”…

“The report surveyed just the work of the top 20 recruiters so these are people highly successful in placing unemployed people in jobs and therefore earning money for A4e.

“Now, the report said eight per cent of the claims surveyed were either potentially fraudulent or irregular, a further nine per cent were risky, 14 were uncheckable, often because the employer could not be contacted or indeed found, and as a result, only 70 per cent of all the claims could be verified.”

Watch his interview on BBC News 24:

Regular readers will recall that, earlier this month, A4e tried to prevent Left Foot Forward from publishing an internal document (pdf) that appeared to indicate poor performance on behalf of the scandal-hit welfare-to work company.

We reported that the document (pdf) showed:

…the job entry rate, i.e. the proportion of individuals A4e is responsible for at some level, manages to find a job for, is 8.4 per cent overall and 9.7 per cent if ‘specialists’ – those partners dealing with difficult cases – are excluded.

Meanwhile, the percentage of those who secure a job managing to hold on to that job for 26 weeks, appears to be denoted by the Outcome/Potential Outcome collumn, which has a total of 1.9%, including and excluding difficult cases. If this is the right reading of the table, then it represents a dramatic undershooting of the Department for Work and Pensions’ own targets.

As can be seen from this National Audit Office report (pdf) published in January 2012, the DWP expects 36 per cent of those referred to companies such as A4e to be secured a job for at least 26 weeks (page 4), and 28 per cent of those not on the Work programme to reach this milestone on their own (page 22).

The latest revelations from the BBC show A4e not just failing, abjectly, to hit their targets, but fraud on a massive scale: fully 30 per cent of their claims are unverifiable.

 


See also:

The document A4E doesn’t want you to see 5 Mar 2012

A4e: Corruption, fraud and the £200m failure to help the unemployed 2 Mar 2012

A4e’s fall from grace has been in the pipeline for two years 2 Mar 2012


 

A4e may have threatened us that they “won’t hesitate to take the strongest legal action should you publish this data or make any of the inferences set out”, but something tells us they, in common with all bullies, didn’t quite have the cojones to take on someone bigger than them and menace the much mightier BBC…

 


Sign-up to our weekly email • Donate to Left Foot Forward

44 Responses to “New report reveals “devastating evidence of systemic fraud within A4e””

  1. Anonymous

    Really? No, I think every single evader should be done. Including you. And certainly the poor should be compensated and not punished for your feral 1%’s actions.

    And that’s a complete turn-around on the health service. So you’re going to drop the language of eugenics from your ranting now? And you’re going to admit that the NHS has a good safety record compared to other countries systems?

  2. Anonymous

    Ah right, so in face your reply to me was two-faced, since you just called for closing down any government service for the 99% again.

    A4E never had a role beyond saving the government money at the expense of people’s lives.

    And of course you call for destroying this country’s economy and the 1% laughing all the way to the bank, using the language of inevitability because you’re protecting corporate welfare. Typical far right corporatist…

  3. Anonymous

    Look, if you want the cash, get a gun go and a mug someone for it.

    You’re basically a little coward. You want someone else to do the mugging for you.

    As for eugenics, it was Labour party policy. From the campaign for Sterlization, advocated by Keynes and Beveridge amongst others.

    The NHS might be better compare to Burkino-Faso and the US if you have to rely on the state for your health care, awful compared to say Switzerland or Germany. Not surprising that you are off to Germany by the way.

    20,000 or more deaths a year causes by NHS errors. Should they get compensation or should it just be people with failed boob jobs? If your relatives are killed, sod it, get on with it.

    Ah yes, no comments there.

  4. Anonymous

    Ah yes, thanks for your insight into your thought process there. Violence, death, murder.
    And I’m the coward?

    I’m also not a labourite, I’m LEFT wing. LEFT. Not CENTRE. There is a difference between these words. And I see, despite the fact that we’ve had very good health outcomes you can’t be bothered with dem statistic things. Never mind that you’re supporting a system where there will be financial reasons to cover up data.

    Thanks for setting out your goals for a system like Burkino-Faso and the US, though. Typical…

  5. Anonymous

    20,000 deaths a year caused by the NHS.

    What statistics do you have for the number of deaths that they cause?

    Post them

Comments are closed.