Figures released by Shelter reveal the depth of London’s housing affordability crisis, writes Kevin Gulliver.
.
Kevin Gulliver is the director of Birmingham-based research charity the Human City Institute and chair of the Centre for Community Research but writes in a personal capacity; his interests are social and economic policy, especially relating to housing, health, communities and inequalities
Figures released by Shelter reveal the depth of London’s housing affordability crisis. Rents in the private sector have risen steeply over the last 12 months by more than 7 per cent, almost double the rate of increase in the average London wage. In outer London, private rents have increased at three times the rate of wages.
These comparisons are ever more crucial for Londoners since 23 per cent now rent from private landlords in contrast to 15 per cent a decade ago.
A family now needs an annual household income of almost £60,000 to rent a two-bedroom home at the median Greater London private rent. And in half of London boroughs such a family would need an income of more than £50,000 to afford the median rent in those areas.
Londoners are being systematically priced out of private rented housing, with benefit caps likely to worsen the rental affordability crisis.
The overheating of private renting, fuelled by rapidly rising demand as social housing budgets are slashed, is resulting in a burgeoning ‘sardine apartment’ rental market where landlords seek to squeeze ever more profit out of unused areas of their properties – such as roof spaces and storage rooms – by turning them into flats to rent out to desperate Londoners.
• Time to make the housing recovery a political priority 22 Mar 2011
• Shapps’s subprime stimulus is a bailout for housebuilders 22 Nov 2011
• A third of the country could lose advice vital to preventing homelessness 19 Oct 2011
• ‘Back of a fag packet’ housing policy continues 3 Oct 2011
• Social housing needs a ‘New Deal’ 28 Sep 2011
Rising private rents are deepening London’s affordability crisis already felt in the home ownership market. London and the south east generally is the only part of the country to see rising house prices since the credit crunch.
Today, London’s average house price is £354,000 compared to the national average of £162,000; while nationally house prices have fallen by 0.6 per cent during the last 12 months, London’s have increased by 4.2 per cent.
And even though affordability problems have eased elsewhere, they have intensified in London.
The ratio of median house price to median wage increased from 8.6 to 9.7 between 2009 and 2011 and in the most affluent London boroughs the ratios range from 13.3 to 27.1.
The affordability crisis is feeding into ballooning waiting lists and growth in homelessness. More than 366,000 households are on London’s social housing waiting lists; an increase of 3.4 per cent over the last two years. In inner London, there are 199,000, representing a two year rise of almost 11 per cent.
Homelessness in the capital, after annual falls for the last ten years, is now back on an upwards trend with a 10 per cent increase in the last twelve months.
What’s needed to solve the affordability crisis is a concerted social and affordable housing building programme, providing homes with lower rents and homes available on a shared equity basis to enable low and middle income groups to live and work in London.
This has to be achieved with greater levels of public subsidy, even if it means a short-term increase in national debt, which as a proportion of GDP is historically contrary to government claims.
Back in 1979, for every £1 invested in bricks and mortar, £1 was used to subsidise rents and mortgages. Now, the ratio is £1:£5.
Transferring housing subsidies that currently go to private landlords and financial institutions, which lend to housing associations, to bricks and mortar is more economically rational since it creates new housing assets, provides jobs and stimulates economic growth.
72 Responses to “London’s affordable housing crisis: The stats that will shock”
Ed's Talking Balls
Rising prices have hardly left us inundated with new housing, have they? Besides, land is finite and we are but a small island. While I agree we need to build more houses, we also need to address wider problems.
Allowing buy-to-let slime to hoard scarce housing and buy up the even scarcer new housing as “investments” perpetuates the problem.
Government should encourage people to do useful things. Starting businesses creates employment; buying shares gives companies capital which they can use to develop new products, etc. Government should do everything it can to prevent a harmful practice such as this. Buy-to-let helps only the landlords’ bank balances: it hurts tenants and the wider population.
Ed's Talking Balls
Agreed. There should be no partisanship on this.
I really can’t see why this isn’t higher up the agenda. I know why politicians couldn’t give a stuff (8 houses Huhne and co are direct beneficiaries) but surely constituents right across the country (and especially in London) must be very concerned about this?
Anonymous
Building /council/ houses. Houses are not being built as it is. People can’t get mortgages.
Anonymous
No rent cap = social cleansing
The UK’s housing stock is also in shocking condition already. Landlords have very few incentives at present to improve houses.
Never stop servicing the 1%, Blagger.
Anonymous
That’s fine, proper rents for social and council property would be below the cap anyway.
And they can get the property back into development then, like it should have been.
You’re looking to blame immigration for something which is a huge problem in areas without any significant immigration, and comes from building falling off sharply due to Thatcher.
As usual, hatred and xenophobia underlay your problems with everything.