It wos the Sun wot couldn’t do maths: Prioritising benefit frauds when tax fraud is 10x worse

Why on earth would the Sun focus on benefit fraud rather than tax avoidance, asks Alex Hern. Could it be because of the actions of their proprietor, one R. Murdoch Esq?

 

The Sun has today launched its campaign against tax evasion, vilifying those, usually the very richest in society, whose scams cost the taxpayer a total of over £15 billion a year (pdf).

Hang on, sorry.

The Sun has today launched its campaign against benefit fraud, vilifying those, usually the very poorest in society, whose scams cost the taxpayer a total of over £1 billion a year (pdf).

Tom Newton Dunn, the paper’s political editor, writes:

THE SUN today calls on readers to help end the benefits frauds that cost the country a record £1.2 BILLION last year.

We urge Brits to shop the cheats stealing from honest taxpayers when the nation can least afford it.

Campaigning Iain Duncan Smith last night backed The Sun’s crusade to end the scandalous benefits fraud crippling the country…

The Sun’s first move is to hand over the evidence on Denise Knight, 44, who enjoyed a day on theme park white-knuckle rides despite claiming Disability Living Allowance for a bad back.

The Department for Work and Pensions will investigate whether the mum from Llangadog, Carmarthenshire — featured on our front page yesterday — is still entitled to her £50-a-week benefit.

The decision of the Sun to hone in on benefit fraud is an odd one. If, as they suggest, the £1.2 billion a year lost to deliberate fraud is ‘crippling the country’, then tax evasion, which costs the treasury over ten times that, must be outright killing it.

The annual fraud indicator (pdf) estimates a £15 billion loss through tax fraud – deliberate underpayment of taxes. And rather than their targets being people who are ill-placed to defend themselves against accusations, the archetypal tax evader is Conrad Black – rich, above the law, and with full knowledge of what they are doing.

But that’s the low end of the estimate. The Tax Justice Network reported that almost £70 billion were lost to what they call the ‘shadow economy’.

And when you count tax evasion – which includes everything from companies having PO box offices in the Cayman Islands to individuals, from leading businessmen to top-tier politicians, paying themselves as companies – the difference becomes staggering. The TJN estimate over £120 billion of taxes are undercollected through evasion and avoidance annually.

Of course, there may be a reason for their blind eye. As Left Foot Forward reported last year:

As far back as 1995, the Independent reported that in the previous ten years, Murdoch’s News International had paid “virtually no tax”.

While corporation tax was set at 33 per cent, NI paid £11.74m of its £979.4m profit – just 1.2 per cent.

As recently as 2009, News Corporation’s proprietor was being pursued by his homeland’s government after failing to pay the correct rate of corporation tax, both in Australia and the United States.

Earlier this year, Australian Capital Territory (ACT) treasury officials won a legal battle,which awarded them A$77m for avoided taxes and duties. The Guardian reported in 2005 that Murdoch’s family company was moved to Bermuda; the tax bill of A$1.2 billion had the potential to be avoided.

Of course, it may be Murdoch is unaware of his corporation’s tax-shy practice given how little he knows about other key operational issues at News International.

Update: We’d underestimated tax avoidance by £50 billion. Our graph is now even longer.

See also:

The government’s got big plans for workfare – don’t expect them to back down easilyIzzy Koksal, February 27th 2012

The DWP’s ‘scrounger’ rhetoric is causing real harmAlex Hern, February 6th 2012

Labour’s untenable position on social security and disabilityDeclan Gaffney, January 3rd 2012

Tax isn’t taxing when you’re Goldman SachsAlex Hern, December 20th 2011

Hypocrite Murdoch tells us how to vote yet avoids billions in taxClaire French, July 11th 2011

68 Responses to “It wos the Sun wot couldn’t do maths: Prioritising benefit frauds when tax fraud is 10x worse”

  1. Anonymous

    Guardian – off shore trusts to evade UK tax

    Ken Livingstone – Ltd company to retain profits and avoid employer’s NI

    Yep. Socialism at work.

    What’s the real problem?

    A government that is spending too much money.

    Take one example, DLA. 1 million used to claim the equivalent. 2.5 million now do. It’s fraud by government to hide the number of unemployed.

    Where is that in your fraud figure?

    What about false accounting? Where is the state pension as a government debt? Not there. Fraud, and far more dangerous that taxation. The reason is that we’re at the point were the government can’t afford to pay out on its pension promises. For most people that is all they have for their retirement, and the government is going to steal that.

  2. Alex Smith

    It wos the Sun wot couldn't do maths: Prioritising benefit frauds when tax fraud is 10x worse: http://t.co/mH4LqZQm by @alexhern

  3. Blarg1987

    Valid points but it would not be so bad if companies and organisations did not avoid their moral duty of paying proper taxes and in alot of cases get subsidised goods and services from the tax payer, I wonder how many people who drive nice cars and own buisnesses write it off against tax, there lies the problem.

  4. Bananayz

    It being legal doesn’t make it right..
    Sadly we’re not rich enough to lobby them. That and it all works in favour of their big business friends so they wouldn’t change it anyway, there’s a reason it’s legal, because the ones in control of the laws are the ones who do it.

Comments are closed.