Following today’s news six major disability charities have warned the government about its use of ‘scrounger’ rhetoric, we look at how widespread it has become.
Six leading disability charities have spoken out against the government’s ‘scrounger’ rhetoric on welfare cuts, saying it fuels abuse of disabled people.
The Guardian reports:
While the charities speaking out – Scope, Mencap, Leonard Cheshire Disability, the National Autistic Society, Royal National Institute for the Blind (RNIB), and Disability Alliance – say inflammatory media coverage has played a role in this, they primarily blame ministers and civil servants for repeatedly highlighting the supposed mass abuse of the disability benefits system, much of which is unfounded…
Scope’s regular polling of people with disabilities shows that in September two-thirds said they had experienced recent hostility or taunts, up from 41 per cent four months before. In the last poll almost half said attitudes towards them had deteriorated in the past year.
Left Foot Forward reported about the tabloid attacks on disabled people back in June last year, following the results of an appalling survey carried out by Scope which revealed that half of London respondents said they experienced discrimination on a daily or weekly basis, and that 63 per cent of people with disabilities in London thought others did not believe they were disabled.
Dominic Browne wrote:
Many journalists cultivate the perception that if you are on a disability benefit you are either, a drug addict, a cheat, have to be forced into work, or should stop moaning because disability can be good for you. The second to last link, taken from the Mail, has a picture caption reading:
“Feet up: Claimants will lose their disability benefits as the public spending cuts bite (Posed by model).”
For an article about disabled people having their benefits cut we have a completely staged photo of a able-bodied man sitting on a sofa smoking a cigarette.
And of course just last week, Left Foot Forward reported on Rod Liddle’s disgusting – if unsurprising – attack on the ‘fake disabled’, in which he wrote:
My New Year’s resolution for 2012 was to become disabled. Nothing too serious, maybe just a bit of a bad back or one of those newly invented illnesses which make you a bit peaky for decades – fibromyalgia, or M.E…
Just the day after, James Dellingpole joined in the attack, blaming “the fake disabled” for “crippling our economy”.
But although the tabloids are doing the dirty work, the DWP is not innocent in this peddling of slurs. They routinely misrepresent their own statistics in a manner guaranteed to generate negative coverage of disabled people – and, surely coincidentally, ease the passage of their legislation.
As Steve Griffiths wrote for us last month:
The DWP press release opens with a mis-statement of the legislation:
‘The figures also show that a further 17 per cent can do some work with the right help and support’.
This interprets those assessed as belonging to the ESA work related activity group are as having been found ‘fit for work’. Yet the legislation states clearly that people qualify for ESA, including the work related activity group, because it is ‘unreasonable to expect them to work’ because of their ‘physical or mental condition’.
It is a misrepresentation that goes unchallenged almost daily.
Secondly, the 36 per cent whose claim was ‘abandoned’ before their assessment was complete are routinely represented as found ‘fit for work’.
Peddling the scrounger myth was only ever going to have one result. The DWP will have seen this coming, and the fact that they did it anyway is a disgrace.
See also:
• Look Left – The hate-filled Right hone in on their next target: Disabled people – Shamik Das, January 27th 2012
• Liddle’s latest outrage shouldn’t surprise us – Alex Hern, January 26th 2012
• It’s nearly time for the DWP’s quarterly love-in with the tabloids – Steve Griffiths, January 20th 2012
• Aggression is a fact of life for the disabled in London, as the tabloids continue to attack – Dominic Browne, June 13th 2011
• Society and the media are failing the sick and disabled – Sue Marsh, May 13th 2011
58 Responses to “The DWP’s ‘scrounger’ rhetoric is causing real harm”
GKH
“Arbeit Macht Frei”!
Now-days “the Final solution” can be sought in your own home. In Germany (rightly or wrongly -?-), to deny “The Shoah” is a criminal offence.
(…aaahhhhh ! -there was no one left……-)
Anonymous
I’m disabled nope really i swear to god, I’m classed by the DWP yes the DWP not my GP as being Paraplegic, but to be honest it’s shocking of late, I have been spate at, and I have been pushed, I sat down to have a coffee yes in a wheelchair, and a young lady accused me of being a scrounger then another two one saying he saw me jogging, I got spate at and my coffee knocked over.
The police arrived and asked me, and this is no joke if I could prove i was disabled, I had to prove to them , which I did, but it was felt no charges should be sought because people felt angry about welfare reforms. ah well never mind.
Work makes one free or in the real language…………….”Arbeit macht frei
David V Humphreys
RT @leftfootfwd: The DWP’s ‘scrounger’ rhetoric is causing real harm http://t.co/UK1JYjOU + THAT priceless IDS underclass/disability pic.
Arecbalrin
Virtually all of that increase happened between 1989 and 1995, correlating with the period when disabled people were being transitioned from residential units where they didn’t receive Invalidity Benefit and then those units closed. Putting them on benefits was cost-saving; it’s cheaper to pay someone benefits each week then it is to keep them in care for a day.
This is publicly available information that has been widely disseminated, yet the Right choose not to listen and instead want to make out that a substantial increase happened between 1997 and 2010 when the reality is that Incapacity Benefit peaked in 2005 and then began falling even before ESA was introduced to replace it. New Labour were harsher on claimants than any other government that came before them since 1948 and I don’t say that as praise.
Mason Dixon, Autistic.
Arecbalrin
Pejorative labels like ‘scroungers’ are used routinely in certain newspapers as synonyms for anyone claiming benefits. Whilst ministers themselves avoid using them, those ministers never speak out pro-actively against newspapers using them and those ministers never fail to provide a quote knowing full-well how such articles usually turn out in print. They shouldn’t be lending their names to them along with what tiny credibility they have.
But it’s worse than that: whilst ministers routinely insist they have no influence on what those newspapers publish, much of what those newspapers publish are simply what those ministers themselves provided as secret briefings. Early on the National Audit Office demanded to know why ‘press releases’ were being sent to selected newspapers and the Coalition had to give in and publish all future briefings on the DWP website. Only they changed the format from press releases to ‘research’ and labeled the page ‘Ad Hoc Analysis’ to hide what their purpose was and refused to release the past briefings showing clearly what they were doing. This page on the DWP website contains papers which are of no real value for in-house research or policy-making; they exist purely to generate news stories.
Ministers are culpable for what the newspapers print as a result of those ‘reports’ and for the blatant misuse of departmental resources for partisan political purposes.
Mason Dixon, Autistic.