Credit rating agencies beaten by a spreadsheet

Alex Hern reports on yet more news showing the uselessness of credit ratings agencies

 

A spreadsheet with some publicly available accounting and market based information can do a better job at predicting the probability that companies will default than the ratings agency Standard and Poor’s, according to a paper released by economists Jens Hilscher and Mungo Wilson, of Brandeis and Oxford Universities.

Olaf Storbeck of Economics Intelligence reports:

At the core of the paper are corporate bond ratings by Standard & Poor’s. Hilscher and Wilson look at all assessments that have been given between 1986 and 2008.

Additionally, they constructed an alternative indicator that is meant to gauge the default risk of the bond issuers. The economists only use publicly available information for this “failure score”, mainly balance sheet data like profitability, leverage and cash holdings.

The authors conclude (pdf):

We find that this measure… is substantially more accurate than rating at predicting failure at horizons of 1 to 10 years.

The higher accuracy in predicting the cumulative failure probability is driven by a much higher ability of failure score at predicting marginal default probabilities at horizons of up to 2 years and the fact that credit rating adds little information to marginal default prediction at horizons up to 5 years.

In other words:

Ratings are in fact a poor predictor of corporate failure.

See also:

Osborne’s austerity is failing at the one thing it’s supposed to doAlex Hern, February 14th 2012

Credit rating agencies weigh in on independent ScotlandAlex Hern, February 6th 2012

European socialists call for regulation of the ratings agenciesAlex Hern, January 18th 2012

No, Gideon, low gilt yields aren’t good news, and here’s whyCormac Hollingsworth, November 16th 2011

The current crisis: brought to you politician by inaction and unaccountable credit rating agenciesGeorge Irvin, August 8th 2011

33 Responses to “Credit rating agencies beaten by a spreadsheet”

  1. Newsbot9

    Well, it’s your POLICY that pensions pay the price for the government’s austerity, so…

  2. Anonymous

    Pensions pay the price for not using assets to back them. You need to dig back to see the real cause.

    Austerity has arisen because government have been running naked off the book debts. Debts with no assets to match. Off the books because it wasn’t reported in the accounts, and so politicians assumed that the debts are small.

    That’s why you won’t get the promised gold plated pension of yours. They will cut it. The tyranny of the majority. It’s called democracy and you are vulnerable.

  3. Alexander at odds with Osborne over UK credit rating | Left Foot Forward

    […] See also: • Credit rating agencies beaten by a spreadsheet 16 Feb […]

Comments are closed.