Cormac Hollingsworth reveals the government’s two-faced attitude to pensions; gold-plate the private sector ones, while cutting those of the public sector.
In April 2012, the government will change how it compensates public pensioners for inflation rises, no longer paying public pensions indexed to the retail price index (RPI) but indexing versus the consumer price index (CPI) at a cost to pensioners of possibly as much as 1.4 per cent per year in lost rises.
This is one of the reasons why public sector workers are in industrial dispute. How much angrier will they be when they find out that while their indexation to the better RPI will end in April, this month the government gold plated RPI government payments to private pensioners until 2047, for another 35 years?
In the 2011 budget, the chancellor announced that the default inflation indexation for government payments would change from RPI to CPI. The reason for the change is that indexing to CPI saves the government money, and of course conversely costs money to the people receiving those payments.
The two major losers here are both pensioners: Public sector pensioners lose out, because they directly receive payments from the government; but so too do private sector pensioners. As Chart A.1 shows, this is because the only buyers of government index-linked gilts are the funds that pay private pensions. There are no other buyers.
Chart A.1:
And just like the public sector unions, the private pension funds told the government in quite clear terms that they didn’t want it to change the indexation to CPI.
But unlike the government’s stance on public pensions, on November 29th last year, the day before N30, the government’s debt agency, the DMO, announced that the government would not try to sell any CPI-linked bonds, because the private pensions funds were on a buyers strike.
But the government owns the whip-hand here.
There are literally no other sellers of bonds that will pay interest linked to inflation rates. And given the pension funds need to receive these payments from the government so they can pass them onto their pension clients, how long do you think the bond market would have held out before they capitulated and started buying CPI bonds?
Well, we shall never know.
A week ago, the private pension funds were able to buy a bond that will pay them RPI-linked payments for the next 35 years. So, while in April this year public pensioners will start getting lower pension rises linked to CPI, private pensioners have just received a guaranteed RPI-linkage for another generation.
In 35 years, that means private pensioners will be receiving 63 per cent more in their pension than public sector pensioners, all facilitated by our government, as Chart 2 shows.
A gold plated promise!
Chart 2:
As we know, of course, there is also a class element to this. The higher your income, the more likely you are to be enrolled in a pension. The data from the ONS of percentage not enrolled in a pension versus income and age are charted above.
For example, for 40-49 year olds on the lowest income 77 per cent aren’t in a pension, but for those earning above £600 per week, in the same age, over 81 per cent are in a pension.
Happily for the richest, as they reach 80, because of the deal the government did last week, they will still be receiving RPI-linked pensions. So much for “we’re all in it together.”
See also:
• Four myths about today’s strike: Busted. – Alex Hern, November 30th 2011
• Osborne proved the doommongers wrong – the economy is even worse than we predicted – George Irvin, November 30th 2011
• Public sector pensions no more gold-plated than those in private sector – Nigel Stanley, November 28th 2011
• New survey shows public more willing to take action over pensions – Neil Foster, November 21st 2011
• Report suggests cost of current public sector pension schemes is affordable – Naomi Cooke, May 27th 2011
34 Responses to “Government gold-plates private pensions while cutting public ones”
Patrick Renner
.@CormacHolly reveals how the government is gold-plating private pensions while cutting public ones: http://t.co/b6Hdk5zn
Mark the Webalyst
I think this may be misleading, based on a false premise – that the private and public pension arrangements are identical apart from in the RPI or CPI linkage.
There is another difference:
– public pensions are linked to CPI on their output. In other words, if I retire next year and my pension is X, then the following year it will be X+CPI and so on for each year. The governmet determines X.
– private pensions are based on a fund that has been built up in order to purchase an annuity (the index linked guilts you refer to). Actually, the private pensioner can buy a non-index linked annuity (guilt) if they wish, in which case X will start at a higher level and NOT increase at all. Or they can start wit ha smaller X, and have it increase year by year by the CPI as you have suggested. So if the government were to switch from RPI from CPI for the guilts used to pay private pensions, this would simply be reflected in the X a private pensioner would be able to buy with their fund.
So the issue is apples and bananas, which means your comparisson is groundless and misleading. Don’t you agree?
The reason the private pension companies have resisted the change is simply that they want to be able to offer a RPI indexed linked annuity (alongside the non indexed linked versions). It does not mean that private pensioners get a better deal because it is RPI rather than CPI, because they pay for this difference when they purchase the annuity! Just as they would pay more for an indexed linked annuity rather than a non-indexed linked annuity.
Mark
Pulp Ark
Government gold-plates private pensions while… http://t.co/ggBYI04P #Sustainable_Economy #CPI #gold_plated #inflation #muslim #tcot #sioa
Michael
Government gold-plates private pensions while cutting public ones – http://t.co/iV7lBoM2
Hitchin England
RT @leftfootfwd: .@CormacHolly reveals how the government is gold-plating private pensions while cutting public ones: http://t.co/BhwtYt6J