Val Shawcross argues that Boris is wasting millions of public money on an unnecessary and expensive fleet of prestige buses.
Val Shawcross AM is the Labour assembly member for Lambeth and Southwark
Is there a policy that sums up the priorities of Boris Johnson’s mayoralty better than the new ‘Routemaster’?
We’re on the verge of another recession. The cost of living is becoming unbearable for many in London – passenger watchdogs have warned that public transport is becoming “unaffordable” for those on lower incomes because of Boris Johnson’s fare rises. And the Tory mayor is spending millions unnecessarily redesigning our city’s buses.
The so-called new generation Routemasters, costing over £1.3 million each – five times the cost of a green, hybrid double decker – will run on just one of London’s 700 routes. So when, from January, Londoners from Barnet to Bexley and Hillingdon to Haringey will be paying a massive 50 per cent extra for their bus tickets, they should remember where a large chunk of their fares are going.
If it’s a choice between improving their bus service, keeping their fares down or spending millions to alter the design of the double-decker they ride to and from work, what would the cleaner, school teacher, office or shop worker choose?
We don’t oppose the new bus for opposition’s sake. The bus is green and well-designed. But it’s costing millions when budgets are tight and looks strangely like the other green, hybrid double-deckers on London’s roads, which were only rolled out a few years ago.
The notable new addition is the open platform, which requires extra staff to supervise. But according to the mayor’s own figures it would cost an extra £54 million a year to employ conductors on just ten per cent of London’s bus network. To put this in context – the mayor’s latest bus fare hike will bring in £57 million.
He refused to say what this ridiculous policy would cost before the 2008 election, later admitting it would cost £100 million. This has to be the most expensive photo opportunity in history. Millions spent for pictures of the Tory mayor on an open-backed bus in the run up to the May election – paid for by squeezed fare payers.
Londoners have a choice in May: above inflation fare rises year after year under Boris Johnson to pay for vanity schemes like needlessly redesigned buses, or lower fares and a fairer deal under Ken.
See also:
• Livingstone pledges London Living Rent, saying Boris has “completely failed” on housing – Shamik Das, December 13th 2011
• Expensive and ineffective: Boris Johnson’s island airport (even Tories think so) – John Stewart, November 21st 2011
• Boris is turning back the clock for women in London – Shelly Asquith, November 14th 2011
• Ken v Boris: Six months out, Livingstone steps up the pressure on transport and crime – Shelly Asquith, November 8th 2011
• Boris fiddles as London prepares for transport chaos – Alex Hern, October 19th 2011
32 Responses to “What costs £1.3 million a pop and Boris hopes will get him reelected?”
London SE1
RT @leftfootfwd: What costs £1.3 million a pop and Boris hopes will get him reelected? asks @valshawcross http://t.co/HxOSDzxe
katrina
Please London, don't fall for it! …What costs £1.3 million a pop and Boris hopes will get him reelected?http://t.co/fHV12kwT
Mr. Sensible
Ridiculous…
Charles
So let me get this straight: The two Ed’s want to spend billions to stimulate the economy, but Boris paying a few million for a new bus to be designed and built in Britain is a waste of money?
Black
‘If it’s a choice between improving their bus service, keeping their fares down or spending millions to alter the design of the double-decker they ride to and from work, what would the cleaner, school teacher, office or shop worker choose?’
– They would choose the Routemaster, where you on holiday during the last mayoral elections? Attacking Boris on one of his most popular policies is an act of electoral suicide.