Eurozone crisis: A threat or a promise from the credit rating agencies?

Ben Fox runs over the latest in the eurozone crisis from Brussels.

 

For EU leaders preparing for this week’s crucial summit on the euro crisis, the Standard & Poor’s threat of a wave of credit downgrades was about as welcome as a bacon joint at a Bar Mitzvah. It was rating agencies who infamously awarded asset-backed securities filled with sub-prime mortgage debt AAA credit ratings.

It may be that S & P wanted to get revenge on the European Commission who last week proposed legislation to make the work of rating agencies more transparent and accountable with tighter rules to boot. Either way, credit must go to Standard & Poor’s for finding a way to make credit rating agencies even more unpopular.


However, while S & P’s threat is certainly a massive over-reaction it is scarcely surprising. It fits into the pattern of behaviour by the rating agencies – too generous in the boom years, swinging to being far too severe in the hard times. The main problem has been that credit ratings have increasingly tended to become a self-fulfilling prophecy rather than a sensible assessment of creditworthiness.

Downgrading the credit rating of Greece, Irish and Portugal to junk status made it much harder for those countries to service their debts and made bailouts inevitable. If Spain, Italy or, indeed, any country were to suffer a downgrade it would push them into further difficulty.

S & P’s actions follow the agreement reached yesterday by Germany and France to change the EU treaties to enshrine tough fiscal discipline in the eurozone. The ‘Merkozy’ deal seeks to establish debt limits for eurozone countries, to be enforced by automatic sanctions. It would also create a “golden rule” on balanced budgets and the European Court of Justice (as well as the European Commission) would have the power to scrutinise the budgets of individual countries.

While the markets reacted positively to the prospect of a treaty change, the idea the ‘Merkozy’ plan of changing the EU treaties to establish debt ceilings for eurozone countries will be enough just isn’t credible.

History tells us that even limited revision to the treaties takes years. Germany and France seem to want a treaty change by March 2012. This is, at best, very optimistic. Besides, the ‘Merkozy’ plan contains nothing to deal with the current crisis.

In fact, it barely goes beyond the economic governance legislation which the Conservatives and Liberals forced through the European Parliament and Council of Ministers earlier this year. The proposal for a debt ceiling is also slightly puzzling since the Stability and Growth Pact already establishes a limit of 60% debt to GDP ratio and 3% budget deficit.

More importantly, the ‘Merkozy’ proposal is about measures to prevent the next crisis rather than address the current one. No treaty change is needed for this. The turmoil will continue unless the ECB and the EFSF get heavily involved in the bond markets.

The yields on Italian, Spanish and Belgian paper are already worryingly high, and Italy has to finance around €150 billion between February and April 2012. Establishing that the ECB could act as a buyer of last resort could, in some interpretations, fall within the ECB’s mandate of delivering price stability.

Meanwhile, although joint liability eurobonds are beyond the scope of the current treaties, a clear commitment at the EU Council summit to a system of eurobonds involving strict market discipline would send a further signal eurozone countries are ready to work together. Standard and Poor’s seem to be adopting the same tactic as the bond markets have done by forcing up the yields on Italian and Spanish, as well as French and even German bonds.

By threatening a one notch downgrade for the EU’s strongest and a two notch downgrade for the weaker countries, S & P’s are sending a clear message to EU leaders in advance of this week’s crucial summit: get your act together and decide whether you are going to save the euro.

See also:

What happens when Greece defaults?George Irvin, November 25th 2011

If the right cares about sovereignty, why the silence on credit agencies?Alex Hern, November 22nd 2011

Look Left – UK growth forecast to be worse than eurozoneShamik Das, November 11th 2011

The current crisis: brought to you politician by inaction and unaccountable credit rating agenciesGeorge Irvin, August 8th 2011

Rating agencies: The unaccountable oligopoly that can destroy economiesMark Anderson, March 11th 2011

8 Responses to “Eurozone crisis: A threat or a promise from the credit rating agencies?”

  1. keith ferguson

    Eurozone crisis: A threat or a promise from the credit rating agencies? http://t.co/eBUskyG4 – Ben Fox with the latest frm Brussels

  2. Political Planet

    Eurozone crisis: A threat or a promise from the credit rating agencies?: Ben Fox runs over the latest in the eur… http://t.co/9tTQxYnF

  3. black berry

    Eurozone crisis: A threat or a promise from the credit rating agencies?: It was rating agencies who infamously a… http://t.co/jG8E5cm6

  4. Credit Rating Repair

    Eurozone crisis: A threat or a promise from the credit rating agencies?: Either way, credit must go to Standard … http://t.co/tTqCNNSz

  5. Mark Stevo

    Shooting the messenger won’t change the message. You don’t get it.

  6. Mark Stevo

    “Downgrading the credit rating of Greece, Irish and Portugal to junk status made it much harder for those countries to service their debts and made bailouts inevitable”

    No, what made their debts impossible to service was rampant overborrowing.

  7. European socialists call for regulation of the ratings agencies | Left Foot Forward

    […] on Left Foot Forward in advance of S&P’s downgrades, Ben Fox argued: While S & P’s threat is certainly a massive over-reaction it is scarcely surprising. It fits […]

  8. Greece’s Armageddon: Could the military seize power to ‘restore order’? | Left Foot Forward

    […] Eurozone crisis: A threat or a promise from the credit rating agencies? – Ben Fox, December 6th […]

Leave a Reply