If the death penalty was brought back, someone innocent would inevitably be killed at some point
Right-wing blogger Guido Fawkes (Paul Staines) is pushing a Number 10 e-petition to reinstate the death penalty. His campaign has already gained widespread support, from Murdoch newspaper The Sun to Tory MP Philip Davies (from ‘let the disabled be exploited at below the minimum wage’ and ‘can’t we bring back blacking up’ fame). Mr Davies said:
“It’s something where once again the public are a long way ahead of the politicians. I’d go further and restore it for all murderers.”
However, a quick google search and look through the ‘Innocent‘ database finds that murder charges are fairly regularly overturned in the British Courts. People whose original conviction for murder that have been quashed include:
Andrew Adams who was convicted of murdering science teacher Jack Royal in 1990. Members of the jury later come forward to say they had considered evidence not put before the court, the police had been in contact with witnesses during the trial, and that verdicts of not guilty were returned on others involved in the case, inconsistent with Adams’ guilty verdict
Soldier Andrew Evans, who was convicted of the murder of 14-year-old Judith Roberts on the basis of a dream he experienced
Sean Hodgson, who was convicted of the murder of bar worker Theresa de Simone in 1979, and served 27 years despite David Lace confessing to the murder in 1983
Josephine Smith, whose conviction of murder for her husband was changed to manslaughter, after it was established he had repeatedly beat her and subject her to sexual abuse. Smith had originally pleaded guilty to manslaughter
Tony Martin, whose conviction of murder was reduced to manslaughter for shooting burglars who entered his home, which he had done in a ‘blind panic’
And there are dozens more. It seems odd that a libertarian such as Staines thinks that the state is incompetent to do almost anything other than decide who to kill. Under Davies’s policy, all these people would have now been killed by the state in cold blood.
Under Staines’s plan (cop-killers and child murderers would be liable for the death penalty), Andrew Evans would now have been killed.
So what price a life? Is it right that some innocent people are killed so that others receive thier comeuppance? If, as MP Priti Patel believes, deterence did work (which would imply murderers rationally weigh out risks and benefits to actions, and that a life sentence is seen as a fair risk), how many is it OK to kill to ensure that murderers are put off?
All this ‘ends justifies the means’ thinking and trading of lives feels bizarrely stalinist for conservatives and libertarians. If the death penalty is brought back, it is only a matter of time until someone is innocent is killed – an odd outcome to a campaign based on abhorrence of murder.
85 Responses to “Five good reasons why the death penalty should not be reinstated”
Old Holborn
There IS no Libertarian argument in the State executing citizens. To allow the State to do so, is to accept that the State has more rights over your life than you do. It doesn’t.
Ms Bloom
I think this is all a red herring.
There is literally no chance of the death penalty being reintroduced, and no need to pay attention to people calling for it to be.
Meanwhile Guido is gaining plenty of page views on his site. The DM school of journalism.
Daniel Knowles
. @dlknowles @TimMontgomerie Five (rather conservative) reasons oppose the death penalty on @leftfootfwd: http://t.co/szcVGZU
Anon E Mouse
Tom White – There is very good evidence that punishment deters crime in all forms.
A burglar behind bars cannot steal people’s property. A rapist cannot rape anyone from a jail cell. Prison works.
Between 2007 and 2009 criminals on probation were responsible for 121 murders, 44 cases of manslaughter, 103 rapes and 80 kidnappings.
The total was over 1000 violent crimes, every single one by a convicted and released violent offender.
Not a single one of those violent crimes against the person could have taken place if the perpetrators had either been executed or spending the whole of their lives in jail. I’ll take either.
You may consider that judging anyone’s future is “supremely arrogant” but I argue that is exactly what these horrible criminals have done and their victims were certainly innocent of anything.
Take for example Rickie Preddie, the convicted killer of Damilola Taylor. He’s been released and is already back behind bars: http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2011/may/08/early-release-dangerous-offenders
If he had been swinging from a rope, which public opinion overwhelmingly supports, then that little lad would still be alive.
Tell me why the rights of someone like Rickie Preddie are more valuable to you than the rights of Damilola Taylor because this bleeding heart liberal stuff has done nothing to make people safer and certainly not the 1000 real cases I mentioned previously…
David Holderness
. @dlknowles @TimMontgomerie Five (rather conservative) reasons oppose the death penalty on @leftfootfwd: http://t.co/szcVGZU