If the death penalty was brought back, someone innocent would inevitably be killed at some point
Right-wing blogger Guido Fawkes (Paul Staines) is pushing a Number 10 e-petition to reinstate the death penalty. His campaign has already gained widespread support, from Murdoch newspaper The Sun to Tory MP Philip Davies (from ‘let the disabled be exploited at below the minimum wage’ and ‘can’t we bring back blacking up’ fame). Mr Davies said:
“It’s something where once again the public are a long way ahead of the politicians. I’d go further and restore it for all murderers.”
However, a quick google search and look through the ‘Innocent‘ database finds that murder charges are fairly regularly overturned in the British Courts. People whose original conviction for murder that have been quashed include:
Andrew Adams who was convicted of murdering science teacher Jack Royal in 1990. Members of the jury later come forward to say they had considered evidence not put before the court, the police had been in contact with witnesses during the trial, and that verdicts of not guilty were returned on others involved in the case, inconsistent with Adams’ guilty verdict
Soldier Andrew Evans, who was convicted of the murder of 14-year-old Judith Roberts on the basis of a dream he experienced
Sean Hodgson, who was convicted of the murder of bar worker Theresa de Simone in 1979, and served 27 years despite David Lace confessing to the murder in 1983
Josephine Smith, whose conviction of murder for her husband was changed to manslaughter, after it was established he had repeatedly beat her and subject her to sexual abuse. Smith had originally pleaded guilty to manslaughter
Tony Martin, whose conviction of murder was reduced to manslaughter for shooting burglars who entered his home, which he had done in a ‘blind panic’
And there are dozens more. It seems odd that a libertarian such as Staines thinks that the state is incompetent to do almost anything other than decide who to kill. Under Davies’s policy, all these people would have now been killed by the state in cold blood.
Under Staines’s plan (cop-killers and child murderers would be liable for the death penalty), Andrew Evans would now have been killed.
So what price a life? Is it right that some innocent people are killed so that others receive thier comeuppance? If, as MP Priti Patel believes, deterence did work (which would imply murderers rationally weigh out risks and benefits to actions, and that a life sentence is seen as a fair risk), how many is it OK to kill to ensure that murderers are put off?
All this ‘ends justifies the means’ thinking and trading of lives feels bizarrely stalinist for conservatives and libertarians. If the death penalty is brought back, it is only a matter of time until someone is innocent is killed – an odd outcome to a campaign based on abhorrence of murder.
85 Responses to “Five good reasons why the death penalty should not be reinstated”
Anon E Mouse
Johann Koehler – I don’t care about the perceived moral superiority or otherwise of the punishment just the fact that a message is sent that the criminals behaviour will not be accepted by a civilised society and we will act on behalf of the victims not the perpetrators.
You are simply talking semantics but I am talking about the 121 people who should simply not be dead and if we had a decent punishment they wouldn’t be. Or the 44 manslaughter victims. Or the 103 rapes.
In all those cases those specific crimes wouldn’t have happened if the death penalty or life imprisonment had been used; so as much as we all like a theory, the facts speak for themselves.
What I do fail to understand is why people care about the types of individuals that could commit those sorts of crimes more than they do about the victims who have certainly done nothing wrong…
Jemima Warren
Fantastic RT From @LeftFootFwd Five good reasons why the death penalty should NOT be restored http://t.co/8BL7i8x
Johann Koehler
Ok, so your primary concern is for the protection of the innocent, be they the victims of rape, manslaughter, murder, or otherwise. I appreciate that.
But this doesn’t explain why the death of the offender is preferable to life imprisonment, as Ed’s Talking Balls and I have advocated.
Anon E Mouse
Johann Koehler – Because life in prison doesn’t work or every year there wouldn’t be “We need to learn lessons blah blah” as another innocent child suffers and dies.
Locking up Ian Huntly forever didn’t stop Baby P’s torture and murder years later.
Or locking up Ian Brady forever didn’t stop Victoria Climbié’s torture and murder years later.
So we certainly know what doesn’t work – why not try something else?
DrKMJ
@ekklesiaComment @catholicherald @NewsFromAmnesty 5 good reasons why the death penalty should not be reinstated: http://t.co/szcVGZU :