Today's Financial Times has drilled an alarming number of holes in George Osborne's much-spun anti-tax evasion deal with the Swiss authorities last week.
Today’s Financial Times has drilled an alarming number of holes in George Osborne’s much-spun anti-tax evasion deal with the Swiss authorities last week. The Tories had gleefully tweeted how “nobody would have anticipated we would conclude an agreement with Switzerland to tackle tax evasion”, with loyal right wing commentators hailing the deal.
The criticism that “better than nothing is not good enough” will prove harder to spin, however.
In its leader, entitled “evading evasion”, the FT says (£):
“The UK government says the agreement will secure £6bn worth of absconded tax dues for the UK Treasury. That is better than nothing.
“But the real test is whether it is now sufficiently unattractive to violate UK tax law and whether this was the best possible deal. The answer is no.
“First, evaders will still pay less than if they had gone by the law. The withholding tax on investment returns is below the top rate in the UK – by a quantitatively marginal but symbolically significant difference. The one-off levy, too, is unnecessarily forgiving for principal that was not taxed when it was first earned.
“Second, this is an anti-evasion measure that seems all too easy to evade. The one-off tax will only be levied on accounts still open after May 2013. That is plenty of time for evaders and their Swiss bankers to discuss where it might make most sense to place the money next. Lichtenstein, which has a less taxing agreement with the UK, is being mentioned, but there is an abundance of other tax havens.
“Third, though the deal is not presented as an amnesty, it is hard to spot the difference. To let account holders who can keep not declaring their accounts settle their tax liabilities by paying less than regular UK residents smacks of permitting some people to pay their way out of obeying the law.”
It concludes (£):
“It is hard to imagine that no better deal could be had. Switzerland until recently got away with facilitating the breaking of other countries’ laws – mainly because those countries let it. That Bern is yielding shows that pressure works.
“Germany and the UK should not treat their bilateral deals as the last word – and they should support a tougher common European approach vis-à-vis Bern…”
The FT’s last point, about the lack of a global deal to tackle tax evasion, echoes Left Foot Forward’s criticisms of the deal last Thursday; as Daniel Elton wrote:
“Campaigners had hoped for a comprehensive tackling of tax avoidance to be on the agenda for the G20 meeting in November, when governments could have set up an information exchange system between themselves to track down avoiders. This unilateral action by the UK government, and such alleged action by Germany, essentially sells smaller countries without the same clout down the river.”
45 Responses to “FT takes apart Osborne’s Swiss tax deal”
Getting the Sums Right: Why I’m Campaigning To Get Our PFI Tax Back | Working for Walthamstow
[…] as a by product. However, a new report from the Public Accounts Committee published today shows again when it comes to tax this Government is all avoidance and no […]
Time to get our PFI tax back | Left Foot Forward
[…] receipts as a by product. However, a new report from the Public Accounts Committee published today shows again when it comes to tax this government is all avoidance and no […]
Graham Pearson
Well the British Government has done it again. They have come up with something and totally forgotten that the people they effect will come up with something else even more elusive. Being ignorant of management technigues they always forget to play the ‘what if’ game. If I did that, what will happen. I’m just wiating for the Russian Federation to offer numbered accounts to all westerners. Soon it would be worth the Eastern Bloc Countries doing this. WOW Good luck George, Go back to school and do some management training. When you go to get the taxes ther will not be anything there. Did not the USA try the same thing.
Shamik Das
Don't just take our word for it, the FT have also savaged Osborne's Swiss tax deal: http://t.co/ka14Hwyf
Mabel Horrocks
Don't just take our word for it, the FT have also savaged Osborne's Swiss tax deal: http://t.co/ka14Hwyf