Is Piers next on the chopping block?

Though most eyes remain fixed on News International, Piers Morgan’s time as editor of the Daily Mirror is coming under the spotlight over phone hacking.

Despite the resignation of Rebekah Brooks it looks like the true extent of phone hacking in the British media is only just beginning to unravel. It will come as no surprise to most that the News of the World is not the only paper were misdeeds are alleged to have occurred, with Piers Morgan’s time as editor of the Daily Mirror currently under the spotlight.

Attention is now turning to how the Mirror obtained their exclusive, prize winning exposé of the affair between Ulrika Jonsson and Sven-Göran Eriksson, with critics of Morgan alleging the exclusive was a direct result of phone hacking and that he was not only aware of the illegal activity, but encouraged its use.

Further criticism is based on the following extract from his diary, which was originally traced by Guido Fakwes:

“Apparently if you don’t change the standard security code that every phone comes with, then anyone can call your number and, if you don’t answer, tap in the standard four digit code to hear all your messages.

“I’ll change mine just in case, but it makes me wonder how many public figures and celebrities are aware of this little trick.”

The allegations have been overshadowed by the media focus on News International and are yet to gain significant coverage in the UK press, with only the Daily Express choosing to focus on the allegations. Whether this will change remains to be seen, although Brooks’s resignation is likely to keep the news cycle firmly fixed on News International for the time being.

The crusade has instead been led by Guido Fawkes, who continues to be at the forefront of new developments, as evidenced by his latest revelation, that the current editor of the Sunday Mirror, Tina Weaver, has been accused of phone hacking by Max Keiser, a Russia Today reporter, and that Morgan is similarly implicated.

In light of these developments, MPs have been quick to call for Morgan to appear before the judge-led inquiry into phone hacking and he is almost certain to be called. If further allegations arise it is likely to draw other news groups into a mire they desperately want to avoid.

Trinity Mirror are currently standing behind their former employee, having issued a statement strenuously denying the allegations:

“Trinity Mirror’s position is clear. Our journalists work within the criminal law and the PCC code of conduct.”

Should further evidence be presented, it is not yet known whether the group will continue to back him or attempt to isolate the incident and protect their shareholders by pinning the blame entirely on Morgan.

On the other side of the pond, the allegations have drawn more attention with CNN, Morgan’s current employers drawing flak from other US news organisations for refusing to comment on the allegations. Piers is also keeping his head down and declined to comment when contacted by the Express.

33 Responses to “Is Piers next on the chopping block?”

  1. matthew fox

    @ Anon E Ratface

    Why have you avoided the fact that Paul Staines is a convicted drink-driver.

    How can I smear someone when I state as fact, Paul Staines has problems abusing alcohol.

    Your still struggling heavily with the term ” Smear ”

    Do you know who documented Tom Baldwin cocaine habit, a News International newspaper called ” The Sun “, for some strange reason, the story was published on the 9th of July 2011.

    Don’t you struggle with the timing of this story?

    As for all this guff over Piers Morgan, no one including Paul Staines, has not made a complaint to the police, no one has made a statement implicating Piers Morgan in any activities, yet for some reason, he is guilty.

    Why are people sitting on all this incriminating evidence against Piers Morgan? come on Anon E Ratface?

    If I where you, I would make a complaint to the police immediately.

  2. Anon E Mouse

    matthew fox – What does the fact he has a previous conviction for anything from Guido affect his opinion?

    That is smearing plain and simple.

    Tom Baldwin’s excessive cocaine habit was documented in print in 2005… 6 years before the Sun published it.

    I believe in a free press or we wouldn’t have Watergate, cash for honours, Lord Archer’s perjury, John Prescott playing croquet and having affairs, Westland Helicopters, WMD in Iraq and on and on.

    But only you criticise Tom Baldwin for his illegal drug taking – I don’t. I just don’t happen to agree his advice to Ed Miliband is any good – it isn’t.

    As for Piers Morgan it is not guff. I read it myself in his book – he doesn’t deny it and claims they “were all at it” and it was brought up without retraction at the Commons Select Committee this afternoon.

    Are you seriously now saying that Piers Morgan, in view of all this hoo hah would have made that up?

    No one could be that stupid matthew fox although with your replies in this forum I may be wrong.

    The Piers Morgan thing will come along all in good time and as usual you will realise I am right as usual…

  3. The problem of ‘blagging’ goes well beyond hackgate | Left Foot Forward

    […] breached individual privacy for circulation gain, and ensure it’s not one rule for NI, and one rule for the others. Share | Permalink | Leave a comment Comments > […]

Comments are closed.