Iain Duncan-Smith's 'bravery' on immigration may have played well on the Daily Mail, but it ignored several inconvenient facts.
Ruth Grove-White is a policy officer at the Migrants’ Rights Network
Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith has reignited the migrant workers debate, with controversial comments reminiscent of Gordon Brown’s disastrous statement advocating ‘British jobs for British workers’ back in 2007.
Mr Duncan Smith’s provocative speech, delivered in Madrid yesterday, was prominently trailed in the Daily Mail, which expressed relief that the former Tory leader is ‘daring to tell the truth’ about migrant workers. However, a closer look suggests that we may be being led astray once more on this issue.
The bottom line in Duncan Smith’s argument is that British welfare reforms can never succeed without tighter immigration controls to squash the competition for semi- and low-skilled work faced by resident job-seekers.
His view is that British businesses got too used to ‘falling back’ on employing migrant workers rather than Brits under New Labour – and that without more immigration controls ‘we will risk losing another generation to dependency and hopelessness’.
Let’s deal with the question of which migrants we are talking about first. The fastest growing group of low-skilled migrant workers in the UK over the past decade has been people from Eastern Europe, whose numbers rose from 4,000 to 239,000 between 2002 and 2011. EU freedom of movement rights allow them to come here to work.
The UK no longer has any low-skilled work route from outside the EU, although significant numbers of people born outside the EU are working in low-skilled occupations in the UK. However, this group are primarily family members of migrants or Brits, people who have settled or naturalised here, or Brits born abroad. All this means that there are many people working here whose numbers the Government simply cannot limit, whatever Duncan Smith would like to see.
But let’s not panic, because evidence that migration has negative impacts on low-skilled British job-seekers is mixed.
Although low-skilled migrant worker numbers did rise substantially under the last government, there is mixed evidence about whether they had a displacement effect on resident workers, with many researchers struggling to find the evidence for this. Although there is some evidence (pdf) of slight wage depression at the bottom end of the labour market, this is not overwhelming.
Going back to Mr Duncan Smith, why, given all this, might he have launched such an attack on labour immigration today? He has just launched his £5bn Work Programme, which aims to help 2.4 million people get into work amid major cuts to the welfare bill. Given the UK’s faltering economic growth and high unemployment levels there are plenty of reasons why his major reforms might fail to deliver – but they have little to do with immigration controls.
Much more important than waving a stick at migrant workers and encouraging UK plc to discriminate against them in favour of Brits would be to take a long hard look at why some major sectors of the economy including hospitality, financial services, and healthcare have become rather dependent upon migrant workers.
Much wider regulatory measures would need to be put in place to make many of these jobs appealing to the British workforce, including addressing minimum wage enforcement and working conditions. Long-term investment in ensuring that the skills needed by employers can be found in the residential workforce will also be needed.
Unfortunately, there is no quick solution to the problem of unemployment in the UK. But we should know by now that blaming immigration is not the answer either.
31 Responses to “Iain Duncan Smith is not “daring to tell the truth” about migrant workers”
Crimson Crip
Iain Duncan Smith is not ‘daring to tell the tru: http://bit.ly/kWWUeB: writes @migrants_rights' @ruthgwhite #UKimmigration
Michael
Iain Duncan Smith is not ‘daring to tell the truth’ about migrant workers I Left Foot Forward l Ruth Grove White – http://j.mp/mpOLke
Jill Hayward
Iain Duncan Smith is not ‘daring to tell the truth’ about migrant workers I Left Foot Forward l Ruth Grove White – http://j.mp/mpOLke
hugh jones
Until all sides stop demonising the British workforce we’ll never reach agreement. Here’s a reminder of how the trouble started: newlistener.co.uk/home/bbc-memes-the-british-layabout/
Robert
Self employed electrician working on large scale contracts all over the UK, charging £75 a day. Within a year that same electrician had to drop his rate to £35 a day, within two years he had given up because he could not under cut the immigrants who come here from Poland take over the contract charging twenty five a day, they live in tents Caravans and then when works starts to dry up they go, home not paying insurance tax or anything.
I use to work on new house building to wire up a house takes me three days this contract as wages and material so it would on average cost about £1,450 to £1,600 per house, the last time I was asked to do this type of contract the price had dropped to £900 one even charged £400 which did not cover the material I’d use, I have no idea how these people made it pay but they did.
To simple painting a house, the lowest of the contract because basically we are told anyone could do it, three bedroom house price for painting with material is about £250 to £400 that price actually dropped to £100 it takes three to four days to paint no way a person can make the min wage.
I have just seen a large scale contract building 200 houses next to me four of the contractors are Polish they have Polish vehicles which state the name number and contact details in Polish, they basically live in the van.
Oh I know about doing this I use to travel from contract to contract to make enough money in the winter I use to live in a tent near the contract, I use to live off a Primas stove with soup as my main food.
We are going back wards not for wards.