Jim Dobbin MP, chair of the All Party Parliamentary Group for Global Action Against Childhood Pneumonia, rounds up the latest news on international development.
Jim Dobbin MP (Labour, Heywood and Middleton) is the chair of the All Party Parliamentary Group for Global Action Against Childhood Pneumonia (APPGGAACP)
International Development funding has been top of the political agenda over the past few weeks, which is where it belongs. Terrific progress has been made in reducing childhood mortality deaths in the developing world over the last year and there has been yet more good news this week.
Two of the leading global pharmaceutical companies, Merck and GlaxoSmithKline, have pledged to reduce the price of their life-saving rotavirus (one of the leading causes of diarrhoea) vaccines, making them more affordable in developing countries.
Also a number of developing world drug companies have pledged to dramatically reduce the prices of their pentavalent vaccine, which protects against Haemophilus influenzae type B (Hib) disease; Diphtheria; Pertussis; Tetanus and Hepatitis-B, all major killers in the developing world.
For years the international development community has been pushing and working for pharmaceutical companies to reduce their prices and these announcements highlight that the hard work is paying off.
The two vaccines mentioned above can help to drastically reduce the levels of childhood mortality by protecting against diarrhoea and pneumonia, which together account for nearly 40 per cent of all under-5 child deaths:
The recent high profile coverage around the work of the GAVI (Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisations) Alliance; the UK’s commitment to immunisation programmes in the developing world and the global effort to reduce childhood mortality highlights the rightful acceptance amongst the majority of politicians and stakeholders of the necessity of international development.
But there is still a disconcerting minority of international development sceptics.
A few weeks ago a leaked memo from Liam Fox, Secretary of State for Defence, suggested that too much was being spent on overseas aid. This view has been shared by a number of Conservative MPs, who have voiced their disquiet in response to international development secretary Andrew Mitchell’s comments suggesting the UK should be proud of our development contribution, at a foreign policy conference in London.
The benefits and success of overseas aid should now be accepted across the political spectrum and certainly members of The APPG for Global Action Against Childhood Pneumonia from all parties have worked in the UK and across the world over the last four years to encourage greater investment in vaccines and health system strengthening.
The results are clear to see, the GAVI Alliance alone has saved an estimated 5 million children’s lives since being established 10 years ago, a staggering contribution. What is clear is that without this essential investment and support, development economically, socially and culturally in many countries is almost impossible.
Therefore international development should remain a high-profile issue, but it is time for the sceptics to acknowledge the short and long-term benefits of overseas aid, which the UK’s commitment to immunisation programmes in the developing world have clearly shown. The evidence is clear to see, they just need to open their eyes.
12 Responses to “International development back in the news – where it belongs”
Ann Pettifor
International development back in the news – where it belongs: http://bit.ly/jauVKq writes Jim Dobbin MP
Selohesra
I dint think many people really begrudge us making significant contributions to the worst off in the world – despite the labour party trying to talk down the economy at every opportunity and continually highlighting hardship cases in the UK they pale into insignificance compared to some of the poverty and need in other parts of the world. Where I have issue with Dave though is in ring fencing aid just for the sake of it – if it ends up going to some despots back pocket or to subsidise a nuclear or space programme it would be better of spent at home.
mr. Sensible
I think the pledge to contribute 0.7% of GDP towards aid is 1 of the few things for which Cameron should be commended, and the sooner he ignores the likes of the Defense Secretary and gets on with introducing the legislation the better.
Jiesheng
I think the harping of 0.7% will only added fuel to the fire of anti-aid and development critics. However, on a general view so far, the Coalition (or Tory controlled) DFID has done a great job in shaping British aid to be not just about aid numbers.
Cameron is abdicating his responsibility on international development | Left Foot Forward
[…] also: • New report justifies aid to India and other Middle Income Countries – Gareth Thomas MP, August 24th […]