Conservative-controlled Wandsworth council is planning to charge children £2.50 each to use Battersea Park adventure playground at weekends, reports Shamik Das.
Conservative-controlled Wandsworth council is planning to charge children £2.50 each to use Battersea Park adventure playground at weekends. If the pilot is successful, it will be extended to weekdays in the school holidays.
Tonight, Tory cabinet member for Education and Children’s Services Kathy Tracey defended the plans – while admitting it won’t actually generate any money.
She told BBC London Radio:
“[It is] not budget saving, just a pilot to see if it affects usage… We have lowest rates in country – we have three adventure playgrounds and one of only authorities that do, we have invested £3 million in parks and playgrounds, battersea park has 3m visitors a year…
“Only because there hasn’t been a charge before. We aren’t charging people to go to the park. This is a separate facility that some children decided to go to.”
Debating her, Labour’s Leonie Cooper said:
“I find it astonishing that anyone come on London radio and make comments that Kathy Tracey has. Why on earth should we implement a charge for playgrounds? All that will happen is people who can’t afford they won’t go to the park. Wandsworth makes a lot of money already from charging clubs…
“The only way they can collect the charge is to introduce another member of staff to collect charges; it isn’t going to generate income and people outside borough who can afford it will come but Wandsworth residents won’t come because they can’t afford it.”
Eddie Lister, leader of Wandsworth council, was recently appointed by London Mayor Boris Johnson as his chief of staff – a point seized upon by Cooper. She added:
“This is a pilot and if it works then Wandsworth council wants to extend it and Eddie Lister has just been appointed by Boris Johnson as his chief of staff and I worry this could be pushed through in other parts of London by the Conservatives; you need to be prepared for this in other parts of London.
“We need play areas for our kids across London which are free and is wrong to have areas just for rich people.”
In November 2009, Left Foot Forward reported how Lister had urged Tory councils to “increase charges as far as possible beyond inflation” and that fees should be used on a “trial and error approach” to test just how much residents will bear.
Earlier today, Labour’s candidate for London Mayor Ken Livingstone criticised the plans, saying:
“Only the Conservative Party could consider charging kids to play. I believe London’s parks and playgrounds should be free for London’s families and I am deeply concerned at this attempt by the Conservatives to turn publicly funded playgrounds into areas which only the rich and privileged can enjoy.
“This appalling proposal will reinforce fears that the outgoing leader of Wandsworth Council, Eddie Lister is set to drive through a hard-right agenda at City Hall in his new role as Boris Johnson’s chief of staff.”
The plans are likely to further de-level the sporting playing field between the rich and the not-so-rich, cooping poor kids indoors while their well-off counterparts play and have fun to their hearts’ content. As the Guardian’s David Conn wrote during the school sports debate last autumn:
“On the day of the spending review last month, Michael Gove, the education secretary, announced he was scrapping the plan to improve sport in schools.
“The schools, of course, are not private, like those attended by Gove (Robert Gordon’s), culture secretary Jeremy Hunt (Charterhouse), sports minister Hugh Robertson (King’s, Canterbury) – or the prime minister, David Cameron, whose alma mater, Eton, offers 12 squash courts, 20 tennis courts, an indoor and outdoor swimming pool, four cricket fields, a nine-hole golf course, and rowing on the lake that will host the 2012 Olympics.”
A point reiterated by former England Test batsman Ed Smith in the Times:
“Top independent schools have spent massively on sports facilities. Even as a former professional cricketer, I’m dazzled – perhaps shocked – by their luxurious swimming pools and perfectly mown outfields. Some schools resemble five-star golf resorts. Many private schools have pitches fit for Olympians…
“The proportion of British Olympic medallists who are privately educated has grown steadily over the past three Olympics to about 45 per cent. The trend is the same in rugby and cricket: more private-school England players, fewer State-school ones.
“If we could map social mobility within professional sport, it would show a clear downward trajectory. You would expect sport to be a model of meritocracy. It isn’t.”
All in it together? Pull the other one.
54 Responses to “Priced out of the playground: Tory Wandsworth to charge kids to play”
auntie_mabel
FFS! When you think they couldn't be any worse… Tory Wandsworth council to charge kids to play in playgrounds: http://t.co/sXt700V
Joseph O'Brien
RT @wdjstraw: RT @leftfootfwd: Priced out of the playground: Tory Wandsworth to charge kids to play: http://bit.ly/m1ZgrO << Terri …
Meg Howarth
RT @GirishJuneja: http://bit.ly/k1CsNU Wandsworth Council to charge entry to Battersea playground. Basically, poor kids stay home + get …
m shawcross
RT @GirishJuneja: http://bit.ly/k1CsNU Wandsworth Council to charge entry to Battersea playground. Basically, poor kids stay home + get …
Prateek Buch
Really not good – not only in terms of how it will affect play and sports as you’ve said Shamik, but it really isn’t good politics either.
The thinking behind the move seems to stem from a strand of market-fundamentalism that say the sole beneficiary of something that was previously thought of as a public good is the person directly using said service – and it’s a strand of thinking that dominates all mainstream political parties. It gave rise to the tuition fee debacle – not just the recent reforms but their introduction and extension under Labour. Too many political movers and shakers see the relationship between citizens and goods/services as a pay-per-use one – a market transaction, not a way of enhancing ones capabilities to live the life one has reason to value.
progressives need to oppose such marketisation, not just because the poor will miss out on using the facility (equality of access argument that could on paper be circumvented by giving vouchers/credits to the poor in a Blairite stylie) – but because, as with many things, parks and playgrounds are a public good that benefit all of us, so should quite simply be paid for through the public purse not just by the user.