Dominic Browne asks whether Andrew Lansley will be scapegoated by David Cameron and suggests him being left in the job might work better for the left.
Some might argue it’s stating the obvious: a health secretary who received a vote of no-confidence from 99 per cent of the Royal College of Nursing, and a rejection of the flag-ship NHS reforms he spent seven years working on, by the British Medical Association, is in danger of losing his job.
The obvious is not always the inevitable in politics but calls for Andrew Lansley to go turned to rumours and speculation, and now have become that most ominous of understatements – ‘talk’.
The Financial Times writing yesterday under the headline: “Meeting prompts talk of sidelining Lansley” reported that:
“Health experts have been called in for a breakfast meeting with Paul Bate, David Cameron’s new special adviser on healthcare, prompting fresh speculation on Tuesday that Andrew Lansley, the health secretary, is being sidelined.”
The experts attending the meeting don’t at first glance provide any comfort to Lansley:
“Sir Ian(Carruthers) is understood to have reservations about the government’s plans.
“This list is also thought to feature Jennifer Dixon, chief executive of the Nuffield Trust think-tank which has highlighted the risks in the reforms; and Nigel Edwards, chief executive of the NHS Confederation, who has produced some of the most constructive criticisms of them.
“Others expected to be present include Sir Robert Naylor, chief executive of University College London Hospitals, who warned Mr Cameron before Mr Lansley’s white paper of the dangers of having purely GP-led commissioning.”
David Cameron has done his best to let department heads take the blame for the u-turns and failures of his government such as in the forests debacle, or when William Hague was “forced to shoulder the blame for mishaps in the Foreign Office”.
Lansley has already apologised for his part in the health bill failures and been subsequently “humiliated” by Cameron who billed the problem as one of “charging ahead” with the reforms instead of listening.
In light of this and the difficult relationship the Conservatives have with the British public over the NHS, Cameron might make Lansley a scapegoat. This would be humiliating in itself and would have to accompany some major compromises on the health bill. The best outcome for progressives would be for the unpopular Lansley to retain his job, and the healthcare bill to be defeated outright.
Lansley has become a liability and the bill has already lost the support of Liberal Democrats. Tomorrow’s election results may well give the Lib Dems even more reason to retreat back to their base and disassociate themselves from the Tories.
24 Responses to “Will David Cameron make Lansley a scapegoat, and will it work?”
lynne heal
multiple scelerosis we need interventioanl vascular radiologists who will help and can work to make our lifes so much better.As for clinical trials I had one operation NOT clinically trialled yet given to me last year ,which makes no sense when they keep saying this .The whole system is crazy.Many lifes CAN BE SAVED WITH ANGIOPLASTY UK will then become the best in the world in healthcare and NO one is listening NO ONE.
lynne heal
ANGOPLASTY would create many jobs for our healthcare and move UK forward to a disease thats now being understood more.Montel williams who am friends with in USA wants it too and has added me to many of his videos of MS along with others worldwide also
ian collett
If I was looking for an ideal vehicle to meet whatever needs I had, if I found one that was just right and took to the road with it. If I drove it TO FAST and wrapt it round a tree. Would it still be what I needed? Would it still answer my needs. The government is trying to change the N.H.S. too fast and will wreck it.
Lynchpin
Good article. If you really want to sideline Lansley march on the 17th of May to save our NHS. Assemble 17:30 University College Hospital WC1
Steve
Who’s that chimpanzee at the top of this page?… The one that’s backing Labour?