The coalition’s strategy for growth came under renewed pressure today from three leading economists. The remarks were made at an ippr event on growth.
Will Straw is editor of ‘Going for growth‘, a collection of essays from leading academics and economic thinkers.
The coalition’s strategy for growth came under renewed pressure today from three leading economists. Martin Wolf, Professor Wendy Carlin and Gerald Holtham discussed ideas from a new book on growth at the Institute for Public Policy Research.
Speaking at lunchtime today, the Financial Times’ chief economics commentator, Martin Wolf, said:
“I think it’s pretty clear that we agree that the Government doesn’t have a plan for growth and I think we all agree that the deficit reduction plan is enormously risky in terms of macro[economics] and ill supported by the risks tha they have pointed to.”
Following remarks made in a recent op ed (£), he questioned the government’s approach to cutting the headline rate of corporation tax rather than providing increased investment allowances. He went on to list the importance of macroeconomic stability which meant more than solving the “inflation problem”, “making the use of land less irrational” through better land use planning, and “raising standards of education and training through all levels of society”.
Venture capitalist, Gerald Holtham, fleshed out his contribution to the collection of essays arguing for a state-led investment vehicle for the production of marketed services such as toll roads, high speed rail, and wind farms. His argument, which has been set out previously on Left Foot Forward and in the Financial Times (£) and could provide a template for the mooted Green Investment Bank, was largely endorsed by Martin Wolf. In the Q&A, Holtham described the coalition’s current approach as “ideological” and said:
“I don’t think that cutting the corporation tax is going to solve any problems.”
Professor Wendy Carlin of University College London and the Centre for Economic Policy Research presented slides outlining the UK’s economic predicament which showed that compared to previous recessions, unemployment rates had taken a less severe hit during the current recession. Carlin also detailed how the UK’s front-loaded fiscal consolidation put it at odds with other G7 countries as the graph below shows.
Carlin suggested a three point plan for government which would make use of:
– the low interest rate environment to promote investment along the lines later set out by Holtham;
– complementing behavioural changes induced by increases in the oil price with policies to steer “large-scale structural change towards a low-carbon economy” by; and
– the boost to tradeable goods and services from depreciation by using complementary rather than conflicting policies.
Carlin and Wolf both criticised the Government’s immigration policy with Carlin arguing that the current policies were damaging higher education and “other high value added industries”.
A podcast of the event can be heard here.
26 Responses to “Martin Wolf: “The Government doesn’t have a plan for growth””
Mark Stevo
Incidently, a good Construction PMI reading this morning, highest for 8 months. Huzzah! Let’s see how services turns out tomorrow.
Broken OfBritain
RT @leftfootfwd: Martin Wolf tells @ippr event: "The Government doesn't have a plan for growth" http://bit.ly/f07kXt
Stephen Budden
RT @BrokenOfBritain: RT @leftfootfwd: Martin Wolf tells @ippr event: "The Government doesn't have a plan for growth" http://bit.ly/f07kXt
IDL
Guido Fawkes,
You say:
“Higher growth comes from free markets. Lower growth correlates with highly taxed and over-regulated economies.”
The evidence does not support this. Finland, Norway and Sweden have grown faster than the US over the past 10 years. This was at a time when the US was bingeing on cheap credit. In fact, all Western European nations grew faster than the US between 1950 and the late 1980s. This is the sort of nonsense I hear repeated by half-wits down the pub who read the Daily Mail. The Tories have had their right wing Think Tanks working on this for the past five years and have failed to find any credible evidence. If you don’t think government can pick winners then I suggest you look at the growth performance of S. Korea – from third-world levels in the 1960s to G20 forty years later.
Osborne claims international opinion is with him; this chart disagrees | Liberal Conspiracy
[…] him; this chart disagrees by Duncan Weldon March 4, 2011 at 9:10 am On Monday, at the launch event for the IPPR’s collection of essays on growth, Wendy Carlin gave an excellent talk on growth, […]