The coalition’s strategy for growth came under renewed pressure today from three leading economists. The remarks were made at an ippr event on growth.
Will Straw is editor of ‘Going for growth‘, a collection of essays from leading academics and economic thinkers.
The coalition’s strategy for growth came under renewed pressure today from three leading economists. Martin Wolf, Professor Wendy Carlin and Gerald Holtham discussed ideas from a new book on growth at the Institute for Public Policy Research.
Speaking at lunchtime today, the Financial Times’ chief economics commentator, Martin Wolf, said:
“I think it’s pretty clear that we agree that the Government doesn’t have a plan for growth and I think we all agree that the deficit reduction plan is enormously risky in terms of macro[economics] and ill supported by the risks tha they have pointed to.”
Following remarks made in a recent op ed (£), he questioned the government’s approach to cutting the headline rate of corporation tax rather than providing increased investment allowances. He went on to list the importance of macroeconomic stability which meant more than solving the “inflation problem”, “making the use of land less irrational” through better land use planning, and “raising standards of education and training through all levels of society”.
Venture capitalist, Gerald Holtham, fleshed out his contribution to the collection of essays arguing for a state-led investment vehicle for the production of marketed services such as toll roads, high speed rail, and wind farms. His argument, which has been set out previously on Left Foot Forward and in the Financial Times (£) and could provide a template for the mooted Green Investment Bank, was largely endorsed by Martin Wolf. In the Q&A, Holtham described the coalition’s current approach as “ideological” and said:
“I don’t think that cutting the corporation tax is going to solve any problems.”
Professor Wendy Carlin of University College London and the Centre for Economic Policy Research presented slides outlining the UK’s economic predicament which showed that compared to previous recessions, unemployment rates had taken a less severe hit during the current recession. Carlin also detailed how the UK’s front-loaded fiscal consolidation put it at odds with other G7 countries as the graph below shows.
Carlin suggested a three point plan for government which would make use of:
– the low interest rate environment to promote investment along the lines later set out by Holtham;
– complementing behavioural changes induced by increases in the oil price with policies to steer “large-scale structural change towards a low-carbon economy” by; and
– the boost to tradeable goods and services from depreciation by using complementary rather than conflicting policies.
Carlin and Wolf both criticised the Government’s immigration policy with Carlin arguing that the current policies were damaging higher education and “other high value added industries”.
A podcast of the event can be heard here.
26 Responses to “Martin Wolf: “The Government doesn’t have a plan for growth””
Mr. Sensible
I think we’ve known for some time that the government doesn’t really have a growth strategy…
Guido Fawkes
There is no explicit government plan for growth, no picking of winners, no state subsides etc. This is a feature not a bug.
Just as there is no government plan for Silicon Valley to develop new software.
Higher growth comes from free markets. Lower growth correlates with highly taxed and over-regulated economies.
scandalousbill
Guido Fawkes,
You say:
“Higher growth comes from free markets. Lower growth correlates with highly taxed and over-regulated economies.”
Problem with this argument is that the US and Japan, for example have considerably higher taxation rates than the UK, and of course Ireland’s is considerably lower. So the correlation falls. Similarly UK corporate governance and regulation is far less complex than SEC Regulation, SOX etc.
Mr. Sensible
Couldn’t agree more Bill; I’m afraid we’ve heard this from the right before
Chris
@Guido
“Higher growth comes from free markets.”
China being an excellent example of this…oh no wait…they’re the commies. What about Germany? Nope, they’re highly regulated with lots of state support for key industries. Ermmmmmm where are the actual examples of your theory working in practice that hasn’t ended in tears for the vast majority?