Manor of his departure sees Adams receive apology from Cameron

The prime minister's office has issued an apology after false claims by David Cameron at Prime Minister's Questions yesterday, writes Kevin Meagher.

The contrasts between David Cameron and Gerry Adams could not be more stark. While Cameron was sitting his A-Levels at Eton, Gerry Adams assumed the presidency of Sinn Fein – after spending is own youth locked in guerrilla war with the British state. In order to lead Sinn Fein’s campaign in the forthcoming general election in the Republic, Adams is standing for the Dail in the Louth constituency. Relinquishing his West Belfast Westminster seat, however, has triggered a frisson of excitement among parliamentary anoraks at the manner of his departure.

As is well known, Sinn Fein Members elect not to sit in the House of Commons due to their refusal to swear the oath of allegiance to the British Crown (and also because they regard it as a ‘foreign’ parliament).

Members retiring their seats between elections are, however, obliged, under archaic parliamentary tradition, to apply for an Office of Profit under The Crown before they can stand down.

These procedural devices see retiring MPs granted the procedural title ‘Steward and Bailiff of the Manor of Northstead’ or ‘Crown Steward and Bailiff of the three Chiltern Hundreds of Stoke, Desborough and Burnham’. Eschewing the fripperies of British parliamentary tradition, Adams signalled his intention to resign with a simple letter to Speaker Bercow.

Cue much chortling from British politics’ public schoolboy fraternity, with David Cameron telling Democratic Unionist MP Nigel Dodds at yesterday’s Prime Minister’s Questions:

“I’m not sure that Gerry Adams will be delighted to be Baron of the Manor of Northstead. But nonetheless I’m pleased that tradition has been maintained.”

But it appears that Adams – who neither sought nor accepts the antiquated title – has had the last laugh. Last night the Speaker’s office confirmed that Adams has now been disqualified as a Member of Parliament, as per his original intention. Meanwhile Adams claims that the prime minister’s private secretary apologised to him for David Cameron’s point-scoring.

A statement released by Gerry Adams last night reads:

“The only contact I have had with the British Parliament is a letter I posted to them last Thursday.

“That letter said:

‘A chara [equivalent of “Dear Sir”), I hereby resign as MP for the constituency of west Belfast. Go raibh maith agat [thank-you very much]. Gerry Adams.’

“When I was told of the British Prime Minister’s remarks today this was the first I heard of this development. I understand Mr. Cameron has claimed that ‘The Honourable Member for West Belfast has accepted an office for profit under the Crown.”

“This is untrue. I simply resigned. I was not consulted nor was I asked to accept such an office. I am an Irish republican. I have had no truck whatsoever with these antiquated and quite bizarre aspects of the British parliamentary system.

“I am proud to have represented the people of West Belfast for almost three decades and to have done so without pledging allegiance to the English Queen or accepting British parliamentary claims to jurisdiction in my country.

“Mr. Cameron’s announcement that I have become Crown Steward and Bailiff of the Manor of Northstead, wherever that is, is a bizarre development. I am sure the burghers of that Manor are as bemused as me. I have spoken to the Prime Minister’s private secretary today and he has apologised for today’s events.”

With Sinn Fein polling strongly south of the border – tying for third place with governing party Fianna Fail – the prospect of Mr Adams’s party making an historic breakthrough and emerging as part of the government in both parts of the island of Ireland is now a real possibility.

Perhaps his sneering schoolboy critics will shortly wish he had stayed where he was.

58 Responses to “Manor of his departure sees Adams receive apology from Cameron”

  1. Sean South

    “I think a number of important distinctions can be made between these and other events.”

    I’d be interested in hearing the distinctions you’d draw between the IRA bombing of Harrods on the 27th January in 1993 (or the bombing of Oxford street on the 27th of January 1994 – to choose but two events by today’s date) and the attempted car bomb in North Belfast this week?

  2. Anon E Mouse

    scandalousbill – Please don’t do Strawman on me – I’ve read your posts previously and you are too bright not to know what you’re asking.

    When did I say anything about Loyalist terrorists?

    Read what I said please: I think things should be described as what they are and terrorism is terrorism is terrorism…

  3. The System Always Wins

    Excellent. The historical record will show that Gerard Adams was forced to kneel before the British State. A fitting epitaph for this murderous traitor.

  4. Anon E Grouse

    Mouse, I have also read your posts in the past, if you are a Labour supporter I’ll eat my hat!

    Committing criminal acts of terrorism, what I want to know is why no-one mentioned Al Qaeda? They are terrorists too. WHY IS LFF INTENTIONALLY NOT MENTIONING THEM!

    Seriously though they fought a guerilla war and they were terrorists. It’s not an either or stop making an argument out of nothing. Are you a man or a mouse?

    Regards

    Grouse

  5. Anon E Mouse

    Anon E Grouse – Don’t worry you won’t be choking on the felt hat ;-}

    Gave up with Labour after Blair but still centre left at heart.

    Am I a man or mouse? When I come to answer should I squeek up?

Comments are closed.