Tory council leader calls protesters “an ugly, badly-dressed student rabble”

Reading Time: 2 minutes

The Tory leader of Oxfordshire council sparked anger by tweeting: "County Hall invaded by an ugly, badly-dressed student rabble. God help us if this is our future."

The Tory leader of Oxfordshire County Council has sparked anger by tweeting:

“County Hall invaded by an ugly, badly-dressed student rabble. God help us if this is our future.”

Keith Mitchell, pictured right with the prime minister, was condemned by student leaders for his outburst. David Barclay, president of Oxford University Student Union, told Left Foot Forward:

“For many of the students involved in the recent protests on scrapping the Education Maintenance Allowance and raising tuition fees, this may well be the first time in their lives they have been personally engaged in a political campaign.

“For them to be so utterly demeaned and insulted by someone who purports to represent them is an absolute disgrace.

“These young people should be applauded for taking a stand on an issue that will have a huge effect on all of their futures. If there is anything we need for the future of Oxfordshire it’s young people engaged in public life, not reactionary politicians telling them they don’t belong.”

In addition to being leader of the council, Mitchell is a governor of Oxford Cherwell Valley College, whose Mission Statement reads:

“Our ethos is to foster ‘A Love For Learning’. Many of our students gain a taste for achievement and continue to climb the educational ladder towards career success long after they have left us.

The College puts its students first and we have the highest expectations for each and every individual’s educational attainment. Our primary aim is to help you to achieve your desired results and qualifications in order to ensure that your future is filled with possibility.”

Quite how this tallies with Mitchell’s insults is anyone’s guess.

Elsewhere, the government confirmed last night that the vote on tuition fees will be held next Thursday, which, today’s Guardian reports:

“…will give the Liberal Democrats a week to sort out whether they will collectively abstain, or instead split three ways. Labour claimed the coalition was staging the vote on Thursday in the hope that Unionist MPs will not be present, thus reducing the slim chances of a government defeat.

“The National Union of Students and University and College Union have pledged to stage further protests in the run-up to the vote, including a mass lobby of parliament on the day.”

Later this afternoon, Left Foot Forward will have a special report looking at the student protest movement, how it is organised and the wider significance of the protests.

67 Responses to “Tory council leader calls protesters “an ugly, badly-dressed student rabble””

  1. Eddy Anderson

    RT @leftfootfwd: Tory council leader calls protesters "an ugly, badly-dressed student rabble" http://bit.ly/flihWI [what a fool]

  2. Anon E Mouse

    Eban – The main beneficiaries are the students. Why shouldn’t they pay for that benefit once they earn over £21K – it’s a graduate tax and their motives are selfish.

    You say: “I certainly don’t see how working class taxpayers can afford £9,000 a year tuition fees”. Typical misinformation. It is a fee only upon graduation and is £7.50 a week at £25K. If you don’t like it don’t do it.

    When people pay for the armed forces, schools, the police, NHS etc it is for the benefit of the whole population – not just a bunch of middle class whiners. Perhaps you should go into politics Eban – you seem eminently qualified already…

    Steve Kelly – Grow up. Nothing is free, someone pays for it. I thank Labour for introducing this system. Well done guys.

    And where did it say our ancestors were fighting to give middle class wusses free university education on the backs of the workers?

    Please don’t tell me you’re doing a degree in history Steve…

  3. Eban

    You’re right AEM, I shouldn’t have singled colin out like that. You’re an eejit too.

    Oh look at that now it’s “people” who pay for the armed forces. It’s just earlier up the page it’s “minimum wage”. Funny that.

  4. Anon E Mouse

    Eban – Thanks for being inclusive. I don’t see your point though about minimum wage earners?

    Is it right for the dustman to pay for the doctor or is it just unfair?

  5. Deborah Segalini

    Anon E Mouse “The main beneficiaries are the students” Really? Ever needed a doctor, midwife, police person; teacher, police officer, advisor at HMRC? Ever read a newspaper, watch historical tv programmes, used a library? How shortsighted are you!

Comments are closed.