Following Evan Harris's bizarre claim last week that the only way to get rid of fees was to "vote more Liberal Democrats into power", Simon Hughes yesterday said he "would have liked to have voted against" fees - but didn't, just as he threatened to vote against the VAT rise in the Budget but failed to do so, and as he threatened to do over the government's housing benefit cuts.
Following Evan Harris’s bizarre claim last week that the only way to get rid of fees was to “vote more Liberal Democrats into power”, Simon Hughes yesterday said he “would have liked to have voted against” fees – but didn’t, just as he threatened to vote against the VAT rise in the Budget but failed to do so, and as he threatened to do over the government’s housing benefit cuts.
Indeed, if you google ‘”Simon Hughes” rebellion’ or ‘”Simon Hughes” revolt” you’d be forgiven for thinking this was a man who would stand up for those affected by, and vote against, the coalition’s cuts in all manner of areas: students, those living in social housing, jobseekers, students again – and one article on May 10th in which he threatens a ‘revolt’ against any deal with the Conservatives, describing them as “unreconstructed” and suggesting “no deal would be possible”.
His latest remarks came in The World This Weekend on Radio Four on Sunday, in which he justified his breaking of the tuition fees pledge by saying he “had to honour” the deal with the Tories, not his deal with students. Listen to it:
As Iain Dale asked on Thursday:
“What exactly is the point of Simon Hughes? Is he just a giant conscience on a stick? Discuss.”
Also at the weekend, the latest opinion polls provided more worrying news for Nick Clegg. The “What future for the Liberal Democrats” poll on Conservative Home revealed that only half of those who voted Lib Dem in May (54 per cent) expect to do so again, and three times as many Lib Dem voters (44 per cent) think the party has changed for the worse since the election; just 14 per cent think it has changed for the better.
An Ipsos-Mori poll in the News of the World, meanwhile, revealed that 61 per cent of voters regard Nick Clegg as untrustworthy. As Nick Cohen wrote in yesterday’s Observer, in a column titled “The young will have their revenge, Mr Clegg”:
“The final, despairing line from the Westminster village last week was that ‘protests don’t change politics’. It’s as untrue as the notion that the Liberal Democrats are a ‘serious’ party.
“The students may have not stopped fees rising but they have changed politics. They have destroyed Nick Clegg’s reputation so thoroughly, I cannot see how he can recover.”
Update 3:15
There have been a number of amusing tweets in relation to Simon Conf-Hughes-ed’s current predicament:
@JoshFG: What’s the difference between @LibDemSimon and a wesal http://is.gd/iFNRt listening to this it’s hard to tell.
@SharonAvraham: Why didn’t Simon Hughes vote against? Because he’s got no backbone maybe?
@laurelrusswurm: who do politicians actually serve?
@FrankSpring: We can at least thank Simon Hughes for disabusing us of the notion that to govern is to choose.
@DuncanStott: Sheesh. That clip just about sums up how effective Lib Dem communications have been over Uni funding.
@wdjstraw: Not good enough. Is he a man of principle or a fig leaf for Cameron?
@MusingJules: That man could not lie straight in bed!
@Colchester1648: because he’s a coward, and has now ended any chance he ever had of leading the party. He’ll be gone soon.
@Scarletstand: because he’s a wet wuss who wouldn’t recognise a principle if is slapped him in the face with a soggy fish.
Left Foot Forward doesn't have the backing of big business or billionaires. We rely on the kind and generous support of ordinary people like you.
You can support hard-hitting journalism that holds the right to account, provides a forum for debate among progressives, and covers the stories the rest of the media ignore. Donate today.
41 Responses to “Is Simon Hughes Britain’s most confused politician?”
Duncan
“We Are Fighting Against…. 3. Media manipulation and bias to support a hidden agenda.”
“Is Simon Hughes Britain’s most confused politcian” – No, he’s saying he would have voted ‘no’ but he wanted to maintain the coalition which would have been impossible if all LibDems voted no/and or maintain his own position in the party which would have been untenable if he had voted no both of which he wants to do ‘good stuff’ in the future. That’s what he says in the interview.
The reason I quote that remark at the beginning is that during the campaign this website was one of many I came to for sensible commentary. I now find that it’s just post after post of facile LibDem bashing wherein there is always an attempt to make the worst possible (as opposed to the most charitable) interpretation of their actions. And that’s fine, you have you bias, but the website is turning into a left wing version of Guido Fawkes. Honestly; go back and read your headline and ask yourself if “Is Harriet Harman Britain’s most confused politican” isn’t something you’d expect Paul Staines to have written.
I just think it’s really sad, because this site used to be worth something.