The Government claims that “We’re all in this together”. But even with Eric Pickles’ 'transition grant' into account, the poorest areas will do worse out of this settlement.
The Government is fond of claiming that “We’re all in this together”. But even taking Eric Pickles’ ‘transition grant‘ into account, it is abundantly clear that the poorest areas will do worse out of this settlement.
Left Foot Forward has carried out a simple econometric analysis of the local government cuts and compared the post-transition grant “change in estimated ‘revenue spending power’ 2011-12” with the 2007 index of multiple deprivation – the last analysis available. The figures speak for themselves.
In London, there is a strong correlation between the two variables. Poor areas like Hackney (-8.9%), Newham (-8.9%), Tower Hamlets (-8.9%), and Islington (-8.8%) find themselves with the deepest cuts while richer areas like Richmond (-0.61%), Havering (-1.71%), and Harrow (-1.9%) are best off.
The x-axis covers the index of multiple deprivation (50 is the most deprived area) while the y-axis covers the percentage fall in ‘revenue spending power’.
A similar pattern takes place in metropolitan areas. Here Manchester, Liverpool, South Tyneside, and Knowsley get take the maximum hit of -8.9% while less deprived areas like Solihull (-3.49%), Dudley, (-3.39%), and Trafford (-3.79%) do far better.
UPDATE 18.41:
It has been pointed out to me that the local government figures include NHS support for social care. If this were excluded the picture would be even more stark.
Left Foot Forward doesn't have the backing of big business or billionaires. We rely on the kind and generous support of ordinary people like you.
You can support hard-hitting journalism that holds the right to account, provides a forum for debate among progressives, and covers the stories the rest of the media ignore. Donate today.
180 Responses to “Eric Pickles’ cuts target Britain’s poorest areas”
Local authorities face much higher cuts than Pickles claimed | Left Foot Forward
[…] Left Foot Forward revealed that the coalition’s cuts to local government would hit Britain’s poorest areas the […]
Look Left – Wikileaks saga comes to town as Assange tastes fresh air | Left Foot Forward
[…] a few days to be fully realised. First and foremost, the cuts hit the poorest areas the hardest, as revealed by Left Foot Forward (see Evidence of the week below for further […]
New Labour Boy
Labour supporters and/or supporters of the concept of public sector delivered local services need to organse and closely monitor the effect of the cuts upon key frontline services durig the next 4/5 years. All the jargonista, graphs and predictive theorising is no substitute for observation and measurement in the real world. I retired from an essential professional regulatory frontline LA Service 18 months ago. Prior to my retirement, and, in pre Pickles and Shapps times, we had already not replaced 4 Officers who had moved to other jobs, nor were we recruiting graduate trainees; my vacant post has not been filled, so the staffing level is now 50% lower than in 2006/7 with no prospect of fresh young talented Officers being mentored and trained to replace ageing staff. Extrapolate that scenario across all LAs and the 2015 landscape looks bleak; ours is not a service which can be provided by “volunteers”, it is statutory, and Officers have to be professionally trained and qualified.
Liban Awad
I can report to you bloggers that my local council have have already started to cut libarery services, playgrounds are not improved. Its quite simply put, that the coalition want the youth of today to kill each other.
Tory cuts target Liverpool – again | Jennifer O'Mahony : Journalism & Opinion
[…] was during the 1967-1971 session. It is hard not to assume this is why Liverpool will receive the maximum 8.9% cut to its local government funding, whereas a wealthy authority like Richmond-on-Thames will […]