The Left must find an answer to this difficult question: why should those who work hard, especially those on low incomes, support those who do not.
“We’re more Thatcherite than ever,” yesterday’s newspapers have proclaimed, either with triumph (in the case of the right-wing press) or alarm (in the case of the left). However, although the Daily Mail may insist that “public opinion has swung dramatically to the right”, the statistics simply don’t add up.
You may expect public opinion to move against a government over time. One party is elected, it takes the country in a certain direction, and the small-c conservatism of the public as a whole pulls in the other direction, eventually deciding that the administration has gone too far.
This appears to be the pattern in the United States, for example. While Americans tend to believe government does too much, this gap has widened when a Democrat is in the White House and narrowed when the incumbent is a Republican.
Three measures recorded in the British Social Attitudes survey, on which yesterday’s reports are based, follow this classic pattern to some degree, from 1987 to 2005. That is, in the period 1987-1997 under the Thatcher-Major governments, those saying the income gap is too large, agree that working people do not get a fair share of the nation’s wealth, and think that government should redistribute wealth, grow in numbers.
After 1997, with the Conservatives in opposition and Labour in power, the dynamic goes into reverse, with a drift to the right. However, after 2005, something strange happens. Despite Labour clocking up a decade in office, attitudes move to the left.
These social attitudes at least have been moving in a progressive direction for five years. Furthermore, they are set to accelerate that trend under a Conservative-led government. In fact, we may see a Blairite effect in reverse.
While newspaper reports have asserted that the public’s supposed shift to the right is due to New Labour’s triangulation, the Cameroonian Conservative insistence that inequality matters, may cut away at their own ideological support.
Where progressives do face a difficulty is on public support for increased spending on benefits. This has been on a downward trajectory for a quarter of century. While it was as high as 58 per cent in 1991, it had fallen to 50 per cent five years later and had hit 27 per cent in 2009.
If the Left is to regain ideological ascendenscy, it has to find an answer to this difficult question: why should those who work hard, especially those on low incomes, support those who do not. Valuable work has already begun on the issue, much more is needed.
Left Foot Forward doesn't have the backing of big business or billionaires. We rely on the kind and generous support of ordinary people like you.
You can support hard-hitting journalism that holds the right to account, provides a forum for debate among progressives, and covers the stories the rest of the media ignore. Donate today.
37 Responses to “Statistics don’t show public’s attitudes have shifted to the right”
Marcus A. Roberts
RT @leftfootfwd: Left must answer question of why those who work hard pay for those who don't: http://bit.ly/gXQqFD writes @DanielElton
Kevin Richards
Misleading rightwing media -RT @leftfootfwd: Statistics don't show public's attitudes have shifted to the right http://bit.ly/dPmn9i
John77
Hey – maybe the reason why more people are saying the income gap is too large is because under New Labour it was bigger than under the Tories! You don’t need a shift in public opinion about what is right to get a shift in the view about the income gap when they realise it has increased. Of course there is a time lag because it takes time for people to notice the change, so for the next few years there should be a gradual rise in people objecting to the income gap that Brown created even if Cable manages to shrink it by taxing graduates.
13eastie
Eoin wrote:
“The list of occupations that fir [sic] well with doing the double are probably endless, and yet their combined income from JSA and job is rarely above the average wage. These people are vicitms, not cheats.”
Do you suppose it would actually be possible for everyone to earn more than the average?
If not, what is the correct number of people who should earn below the average income?
And whom we should forgive, therefore, for criminal fraud?
Anon E Mouse
Chris – Well excuse me you New Labour lickspittle. The fact is your man – the hopeless dud, Ed Miliband, cheated to get his position and is a complete waste of space.
There is nothing worse than a tax avoiding property multi millionaire lecturing to people about how they should luve their lives whilst not doing it themselves.
I hate hypocrites. Being a Labour supporter you obviously don’t Chris but the sooner you just roll over and start voting for the Lib Dem’s the better. There is mo party more “progressive” than those guys and their door is always open.
Even for individuals of clearly limited intelligence like yourself Chris…