Yesterday's leading article in The Times on the Labour Party leadership election system more reflects the paper's enduring hostility to trade unionism than a serious concern for Labour's integrity. What other proposal for extending democracy would begin by proposing a radical reduction in the electorate?
Tony Woodley is the joint general secretary of Unite
Yesterday’s leading article in The Times (£) on the Labour party leadership election system more reflects the paper’s enduring hostility to trade unionism than a serious concern for Labour’s integrity. What other proposal for extending democracy would begin by proposing a radical reduction in the electorate?
Trade unions did not vote for Ed Miliband in the leadership election. Trade unionists did, in a secret postal ballot – and they gave the new Leader a far wider majority in terms of the votes of actual individuals voting than the weighted percentages cited by The Times indicate.
The direct votes of Labour-supporting trade unionists in the leadership election should be seen as a strength not a weakness – they are analogous to the votes cast in US primaries, which no-one seems to object to, and help ensure that the party leader is connected to the broad range of sympathetic voters. Were the vote to be confined to individual members alone, no doubt The Times would claim that it was all in the hands of unrepresentative activists.
On the larger point regarding the future of New Labour, none of the politicians cited by The Times in their reports seem to have grasped the implications of the crash of 2008 for any political project based, as New Labour was, on over-reliance on markets and, in particular, the finance sector.
I would only add that it is odious to read Margaret Hodge, MP for Barking, describing unions as “irrelevant in British society” (£) when her re-election this year in the face of a BNP challenge was so dependent on supporters we in the unions mobilised from outside her own constituency, a fact she acknowledged at the time.
This letter was originally sent to The Times but failed to make it into today’s paper.
37 Responses to “The votes of trade unionists are a strength to Labour not a weakness”
Pete
@Pete
Read the guardian caption it clearly states that was the *larger* envelope, the ballot paper itself was in a plain envelope inside that larger envelope. That is in accordance with the rules.
Comment by Chris on November 19, 2010 at 5:54 pm
So you have no problem with the GMB placing the envelope containing the ballot papers within another envelope carrying propaganda for Ed?
You don’t feel that its just a tiny bit out of order?
Comment by Pete on November 19, 2010 at 6:22 pm
P.S. forgot to add, that you have just repeated exactly what I originally said which was “sent out voting forms in support Ed envelopes.”. Your attempt to split hairs by saying the voting forms where in plain envelopes may be correct as far as it goes, but is totally incorrect in the fact that they were subsequently placed in GMB Ed propaganda envelopes, as I originally said.
Mr. Sensible
I think it is entirely right that union members should have a say; wasn’t it the unions who founded Labour in the first place?
Chris
@Pete
See comment #4, I have no problem with the ballot paper being sent with other literature. It was entirely within the rules. The extra literature sent with the ballot papers in contained information about all the candidates.
“You don’t feel that its just a tiny bit out of order?”
Nope.
“Your attempt to split hairs by saying the voting forms where in plain envelopes may be correct as far as it goes, but is totally incorrect in the fact that they were subsequently placed in GMB Ed propaganda envelopes, as I originally said.”
No, it is a very important distinction between sending out ballot papers with vote Ed on/in the same envelope with nothing else and sending out ballot papers sealed in their own plain envelope with a non-aligned candidate booklet detailing *all* of the candidates.
Your latching onto something and trying to make an issue out of it, Ed won fairly and completely within the rules of the contest. Trying to undermine his victory and thus undermine him is a dirty trick.
Demolition Government
“Blair was the end of Labour” = Blair led us to 13 years in power..surely that can not be sniffed at?
Derek Simpson
Has anyone questioned how the newspapers and media generally also tried to influence the outcome in favour of David Milliband …. and see obviously why they are concerned that their influence failed!!