Independent research commissioned by the housing charity Shelter from the University of Cambridge today shows that the number of London neighbourhoods that will be affordable to people claiming local housing allowance will halve by 2016 as a result of government cuts.
Independent research commissioned by the housing charity Shelter from the University of Cambridge today shows that the number of London neighbourhoods that will be affordable to people claiming local housing allowance will halve by 2016 as a result of government cuts. Under the current rate of local housing allowance, three quarters of London’s neighbourhoods are affordable for those who receive the benefit to live in private rented accommodation.
But the analysis shows that by 2016, the impact of cuts announced in June’s Emergency Budget will halve the number of London neighbourhoods affordable to claimants to 36%. Nearly 160,000 households across the capital will be affected by the cuts. The research is released ahead of today’s Commons debate on housing benefit.
Boroughs that will remain largely affordable by 2016 include Hillingdon, Ealing and Hounslow to the West; Enfield and Waltham Forest to the North; Newham, Barking and Dagenham and Havering to the East, and Lewisham, Bexley and parts of Croydon to the South.
Boroughs that will have the highest proportions of unaffordable property include Kensington & Chelsea and Westminster as well as Islington, Camden and Tower Hamlets. Shelter is warning that the cuts could change the make-up of London for decades to come.
Chief executive Campbell Robb said:
“This research shows that in just five years’ time, the number of London neighbourhoods affordable to those on local housing allowance will more than halve, with swathes of the capital becoming largely unaffordable.
“This will mean tens of thousands of households priced out of their homes and communities, creating concentrations of poverty across the city and adding to the already significant levels of homelessness and overcrowding in the city.”
“The 53,000 claimants in London who are in work may also be forced to move away from their jobs, so these proposals could ultimately act as a disincentive to work.”
The picture beyond 2016 could get even worse. Government plans to link housing benefit levels to the Consumer Price Index from 2013 will deliver an even bigger blow to people on local housing allowance.
Between 1999/2000 and 2007/08 median rents in London increased by 65%, compared to just a 17% increase of the CPI. Shelter add:
“Breaking the link between housing benefit and the cost of housing will see rents quickly outstrip the amounts people are receiving. While the impact will not be immediate, over time this is likely to make the situation starkly worse and even more neighbourhoods unaffordable.
“While Shelter supports reform of housing benefit, cuts on this scale are going to have a devastating economic and social impact on London and we urge the government to urgently rethink them.”
21 Responses to “Shelter: Housing benefit cuts will “change London for decades””
Andy Bean
RT @leftfootfwd: Shelter: Housing benefit cuts will "change London for decades: http://bit.ly/c3Ntvi
Julian
“the number of London neighbourhoods that will be affordable to people claiming local housing allowance will halve by 2016”
Doesn’t this indicate precisely the problem? Those of us in work who can’t afford to live in most London boroughs are currently paying others to be able to live there.
So, Kensington and Chelsea and Westinster will have “high proportions of unaffordable property”. They’re already unaffordable for most people who aren’t living on benefits.
Melissa Nicole Harry
RT @leftfootfwd: Shelter: Housing benefit cuts will "change London for decades: http://bit.ly/c3Ntvi
banji fakolade
RT @leftfootfwd: Shelter: Housing benefit cuts will "change London for decades: http://bit.ly/c3Ntvi
Mr. Mxyzptlk
Yeah but they are only poor people so screw them as Cameron would say
they can go and live by the lovely seaside with the other poor people
Just like they did in the eighties under Thatcher(were it also failed)
http://www.kentonline.co.uk/kentonline/news/2010/november/9/benefit_rules_changes.aspx
“The government is to cap housing benefits to a maximum of £400 a week for a four-bed property, prompting claims it could lead to a major exodus from London to less costly areas.”
And on the plus side lots of rich Tory voters can move into the now socially cleansed areas..
Although many Tory MPs with seaside constituencies are up in arms over the potential flood of refugees overwhelming the local services(as they did under Thatcher)