Ideologically-driven Conservatives have seized the economic crisis to knock back the BBC – and it only took 48 hours, writes Left Foot Forward's Joy Johnson.
So the Tory-led coalition government has gone on its rampage and at the last minute demonstrated the shambolic nature of the cuts, or more correctly I should imagine, Tory ideological calculation, the BBC was ambushed. Commercial opponents have long wanted to diminish the BBC and in the pages of the Daily Mail and News International its programming and its people come in for a battering. Even in the last few weeks there were complaints about the number of BBC people in Chile covering one of the truly great global stories.
The warning signs came with James Murdoch’s speech in Edinburgh which took the attacks to a different level. Pursuing News Corporation’s business interests, which sees profit in everything, he railed against the BBC’s brilliant web service and declared that the BBC was embarking on a land grab. This was all too much for the Murdochs; for them, the only empire that should grow is News Corporation.
James Murdoch argued:
“The BBC is dominant… Other organisations might rise and fall but the BBC’s income is guaranteed and growing.”
And so you had it. Clear warning signs that took the BBC hierarchy a whole year to counter-attack with Mark Thompson’s speech in the same venue last August. Thompson didn’t go all out with guns blazing but he did make an important, and with today’s news, prescient point:
“A pound out of the commissioning budget of the BBC is a pound out of [the] UK creative economy. Once gone, it will be gone forever.”
It was a defiance that lasted all of a three months. Faced with government battalions, he waved the white flag. The Corporation will now have to pay for the BBC World Service previously paid for by the Foreign office. And the licence fee is frozen for six years. Osborne also gave Rupert and James what they wanted – a commitment from the BBC to spend less on its website.
And calls for the BBC to go down the subscriptions route have already begun. It must be avoided at all costs. The consequence of the ambush has meant that public service is no longer regarded as a public good. The BBC fat cats with their bloated salaries lived high on the hog and it has weakened them; ideologically-driven Conservatives have seized the economic crisis to knock back the BBC – and it only took 48 hours.
49 Responses to “Payback? Osborne’s raid on BBC gives Murdochs exactly what they wanted”
Guy Manchester
Payback? Osborne’s raid on BBC gives Murdochs exactly what they wanted http://tinyurl.com/34ugqll
Stephen W
The BBC is funded by a regressive tax. The government has frozen that regressive tax for 6 years. You are blatantly and openly campaigning for raising regressive taxation because your loyalty to the liberal-left metropolitan, champagne socialist elite trumps any loyalty you may feel for poor and working people in this country.
Mike Thomas
When Sky’s revenues match those of the BBC’s then I’ll pay attention to any argument to be had here.
If I were you I’d take off your tinfoil hat.
As for the BBC cuts, they got off very lightly, firms have been reducing costs by 20%+ and letting over 10% of the workforce go. As for the BBC’s creative output, frankly speaking, it’s shite.
Martin Jones
RT @leftfootfwd: Payback? Osborne's raid on BBC gives Murdochs exactly what they wanted http://bit.ly/9csrah
Alan W
@Mike Thomas
Sky’s latest annual revenue figures are £5.9 billion, whereas the BBC’s licence fee revenues stand at about £4.8 billion, so you should be paying attention right now.
And if you want to compare creative output, all Sky shows are American imports, sport and movies. They’ve only made about 2 or 3 original dramas since they launched. By contrast the BBC actually spends the bulk of its revenues making original programmes. Without it investment in British TV productions would plummet.