David Miliband's mansion tax has been attacked by the Daily Mail. But a £1 million tax, as proposed last year by Vince Cable, enjoyed significant public support.
The Daily Mail today tried a different approach to attacking David Miliband’s mansion tax proposal after its Associated Press colleagues the Evening Standard called the progressive measure a “tax blow”. Perhaps embarrassed concerned that the Standard’s line was at odds with their Dispossessed campaign that highlights income disparities in the capital, the Mail implied the policy was hypocritical. But the idea, first proposed when Vince Cable suggested a £1 million cap, is popular with voters.
In today’s paper, the Daily Mail outline that Miliband’s proposal would exclude his own £1.5 million home from the tax and turn to the TaxPayers’ Alliance’s Matthew Elliott for a quote:
“It’s too convenient to be a coincidence that David Miliband has proposed a mansion tax that his very own palatial home would be exempt from.”
Perhaps the Mail and Mr Elliott have a point and Miliband could be bolder. After all – as yesterday’s Evening Standard was keen to the show – the policy will only affect a meagre 34,000 Londoners and just 6,000 other homes so capturing a few more can hardly hurt.
Indeed, although the policy originally proposed by Vince Cable – to introduce a ‘Mansion tax’ on properties worth more than £1 million – provoked a backlash at Lib Dem conference last year, it turned out to be extremely popular. As Financial Website of the year, This Is Money reported last September:
“An overwhelming majority of voters support Vince Cable’s ‘mansion tax’ – the policy that was dismissed by delegates at the Liberal Democrat conference as ‘electoral suicide’.
“A poll in today’s Mail on Sunday has found that, by a margin of more than two to one, voters back the plan under which the owners of homes worth more than £1m would be charged an average levy of £4,000 each.
“A total of 57% are in favour of the policy, with just 27% against. Even among Conservative voters, the most likely to oppose such ‘soak the rich’ policies, 44% were against the idea compared to 38% for it.”
The Labour leadership contender would be liable for £5,000 if a tax of 1 per cent were levied on properties worth more than £1 million cap – perhaps a price worth paying for a significant £2.2 billion tax windfall*, a popular policy, and calling the Mail’s bluff.
* The Liberal Democrats estimated that £1.1 billion would be raised from a 0.5 per cent levy on properties worth over £1 million.
19 Responses to “Miliband’s Mansion Tax: safe as houses”
Gez
what about Cameron on forcing people out of council houses
John Ruddy
The Evening Standard is no longer published by Associated Press/Daily Mail & General Trust. Its owned by the Russian billionaire Lebedev – dunno how big his London home is, though its probably quite large.
Hitchin England
Miliband's Mansion Tax: safe as houses http://bit.ly/9sFBkz via @leftfootfwd
Josh
Why do you refer to opinion polls to back up your claims? Is this ‘evidence based blog’ merely run according to focus group findings? Every recent poll suggests that an absolute majority of the British people want to see the expansion of the grammar school system. If you are so obsessed with opinion poll findings, you should support the will of the British people.
Will Straw
ejoftheweb, John Ruddy – Very good point and an oversight on my account. Have amended accordingly.
Josh – I don’t refer to opinion polls to back up my claims, the tax is a good idea because it is progressive, targets wealth rather than income, and is hard to obscure. I used the opinion poll to indicate that on top of these benefits, it is also a popular policy.