What should Labour’s leadership contest be about?

This blog will remain neutral during the Labour leadership election. But we want to ensure that the contest is about the future of the party's policy & organisation.

Left Foot Forward is looking forward to the splinters. Yep, we’re sitting on the fence in the forthcoming Labour leadership election.

We’re clear that the process should be months, rather than weeks, culminating in hustings at the Labour conference in Manchester. We want to see as wide a range of candidates as possible. And, critically, we want a genuine debate about the future direction of the Labour party in relation to both policy and organisation.

To kick off this process, we propose here five questions that we think should define the leadership contest. But these are very much initial thoughts and we’d welcome our readers’ views in the comments section as to whether these are the right points to address. This time next week, we’ll publish a revised list of questions and use it to frame our analysis of the leadership election ahead.

1. Economy: Public spending was 36 per cent of GDP in 1999 and has risen to 48 per cent (partly the result of the recession). Net receipts are currently project to reach 38 per cent by 2011-12? What does the Labour party believe is the right size of the state? How do we pay for that? And what is the state’s role once that level has been set?

2. Environment: Tackling climate change is more critical now than ever before. In the face of fierce lobbying by vested interests, and mounting public scepticism how do we inject a sense of urgency into addressing the problem? How would you take steps not just to build a clean energy economy – vital as that is – but also to dismantle the old, unsustainable economy in order that Britain can deliver on the targets set out in the Climate Change Act?

3. New politics: The coalition government is now committed to a referendum on the Alternative Vote, House of Lords reform, recall, and fixed terms. The Labour government arguably failed to deliver on its promises in these areas. What explains our inability to deliver full constitutional reform? How can we ensure that Labour pushes the new Government further on constitutional change and campaigns aggressively in a referendum on AV?

4. The election: Polling suggests that Labour support among skilled manual (C2) workers fell from 45 per cent in 2005 to 23 per cent. Support from 18-34 years olds fell from 41 per cent to 32 per cent. What explain this? Where else has support been lost? How should Labour try and win it back?

5. The party: Across parts of the country – particularly London, Birmingham, and the northwest – good local campaigns helped increase some majorities, hold ultra-marginal seats, and win back councils. How should the party reform to embrace this local action? How should Labour learn from the “respect, empower, include” mantra of the Obama campaign?

What do you think?

46 Responses to “What should Labour’s leadership contest be about?”

  1. Fred Chukkawakka

    RT @AaronPorter: RT @leftfootfwd What should Labour's leadership contest be about? What are your thoughts? http://bit.ly/ccUS4i

  2. Dan

    ‘Tory’

    Perhaps it would be easier to discuss your points if you did not conflate the deficit with the national debt.

    The debt can easily be paid off, when the assets the Labour Government took in return (the banking stakes) are sold back; or progressively reduced, through a state-led direction of this productive capital into domestic manufacturing, housebuilding, re-equipping the economy e.g. ‘Green New Deal’ and so forth.

    The deficit is a problem not of over-spending, but falling tax receipts due to the recession. The only way to deal with this is maintaining consumption, and keeping the economy going until it naturally returns to growth. The VAT cut served both these aims.

  3. Michael Parkinson

    Social Justice and Equality will quite rightly be highlighted by any of the leadership contenders. What about taking steps to ensure Social Justice in the workplace? Also, surely the last thirteen years have shown us that Equality cannot be achieved without reversing the balance of power between employers and employees. This means giving the Trade Unions new powers to organise and affect ecconomic policies. How will any future leader provide Trade Unions with a stronger and more effective voice both within the party and in the workplace?

  4. gankon

    those 5 points hardly makes a drunken conversation let alone a platform for a political party

    1 labour has to pretend to be fiscally responsible after the 1978/79 2009/2010 debacle. just shouting ‘tory cuts’ isn’t good enough

    2 only 1 way to make a low carb economy. that’s a carbon tax. ie a market based reform labour is ideologically opposed to

    3 yawn

    4 the reason labour support has fallen is that most of the last 13 years has been a disaster. you couldn’t even start to list them but constant warmongering and wrecking the nations finances must be the top 2.

    5 the whole ‘changey hopey’ thing. grow up

Comments are closed.