As David Cameron announces his final ministerial line-up, one must ask: Where are all the women?
As David Cameron announces his final ministerial line-up, I have found myself asking the same question as during the latter months of Gordon Brown’s premiership: Where are all the women? Not much more than a year ago, David Cameron had said:
“If elected, by the end of our first Parliament I want a third of all my ministers to be female.”
His four female cabinet ministers are a start, but only represent only 14 per cent of ministers allowed to attend cabinet, and their positions are lower than their male counterparts, with the exception of home secretary Theresa May. In recent elections, record numbers of women stood as parliamentary candidates: rising from 8% in 1979 to 21% in 2010. According to the Centre for Women and Equality:
• The Green Party had the highest percentage of women candidates (33%) followed by Labour (30%), the Conservative Party (24%) and the Liberal Democrats (21%).
• We now have 142 female MPs sitting in the commons.
• Women representing the main three parties include: 81 for the Labour Party (dropping from the 101 elected in 1997), 48 for the Conservative Party, and seven for the Liberal Democrats.
Throughout their election campaign, the Conservative Party offered us a binding contract for all sorts of manifesto commitments, saying:
“If we do not deliver on our side of the bargain, then vote us out in five years time.”
The contract calls for a closing of the gender pay gap (currently at 16.4%), family-friendly and flexible working policies, ending violence against women and an increase in the number of women in enterprise.
They also promised that:
“A Conservative government would bring change to Britain’s corporate boardrooms, introducing new rules to increase the proportion of female directors, and creating new opportunities for women to rise to the top.
“We will require the long list for directorship appointments to include 50 per cent female candidates. This will help ensure that companies recruit from a diverse pool of candidates. It will apply to executive directors as well as non-executive directors.”
So with 55 women to choose from in this coalition government, David Cameron has chosen just four women to represent half of those living in the UK. With their promise of 50 per cent of candidates in FTSE 100 directorship positions to be female, it is a wonder why only four women sit in the cabinet: the directorship of the country?
37 Responses to “No place for women in Cam-Clegg’s “new politics””
Simon Tinsley
Once again, for an evidence-based blog you have failed to realise that the proportion of women in the cabinet is higher then in Labour’s last. It’s gone from 12% to 14%, yet I never saw the bleating about the lack of women in Brown’s cabinet.
Will Straw
Simon – Er…Claire’s opening line mentions the lack of women in GB’s Cabinet…
Patrick – your comment is well out of line and a complete mischaracterisation of Britain. I guess from your blog that you’re based in America. Good. Please stay there.
Guido – None. And it’s a real pity since there are a number of talented women who should be going for it including, Yvette Cooper.
Thomas – Decent point – what about Villiers? I’m unclear why Pickles was picked ahead of her. And what about Lynne Featherstone or Sarah Teather instead of Danny Alexander?
Robert Fresno
No place for women in Cam-Clegg's "new politics" | Left Foot Forward: As David Cameron announces his final ministe… http://bit.ly/a9Yazl
MasterPM
No place for women in Cam-Clegg's "new politics" | Left Foot Forward http://bit.ly/cPjmFf
Simon Tinsley
Sure – I missed the first sentence, but my broad point still stands. Why make the whole article an attack on the Con-Lib coalition? He hasn’t reneged on any promise he made – he talks of wanting at least a third of ministers (note not cabinet ministers) to be women by the end of the term. Considering this blog declares itself fighting against ‘media manipulation’ before writing a whole article over how there are no women in the new cabinet, while glossing lightly over the fact that Brown had less.
Why he set such an arbitrary quota I have no idea. He should merely pick people on merit, whatever gender, colour or creed they may be. We should not be bleating about the percentage of women in the cabinet.
As it is, Villiers, Featherstone and Teather are all ministers. Alexander is in the cabinet as Scottish secretary – a position the Lib Dems were always going to get considering the Tories weak showing in Scotland, and Featherstone/Teather are both London based MPs, the position is really only viable to a Scottish MP. For the record, I disagree with Cheryl Gillan’s appointment as Welsh secretary in that she is not an MP for a constituency in Wales, yes.