Nick Clegg's planned policy of "tax cuts for people and families on low and middle incomes" would be deeply regressive according to a new report.
Nick Clegg’s planned policy of “tax cuts for people and families on low and middle incomes” would be deeply regressive according to a detailed analysis by Tim Horton and Howard Reed for Left Foot Forward.
In December, the Liberal Democrats set out a policy to “raise the threshold at which people start paying income tax from current levels to £10,000”. They have made this policy one of four central “tests” for cooperation with a minority government in the event of a hung parliament and Nick Clegg has said:
“This will be a huge change to our society, to make the tax system fair. Offering real help – and hope – to millions of low income families. A vital step towards delivering real social justice for all.”
But a detailed report, ‘Think again, Nick! Why spending £17 billion to raise tax thresholds would not help the poorest’ (pdf) by Tim Horton and Howard Reed for Left Foot Forward shows that:
• the measure would do nothing to help the very poorest, who don’t have income large enough to pay tax;
• only around £1 billion of the £17 billion cost (6 per cent) actually goes toward the stated aim of lifting low-income households out of tax;
• households in the second richest decile would gain on average four times the amount than those in the poorest decile; and
• the policy would increase socially damaging inequalities between the bottom and middle.
Horton and Reed conclude that:
“the Liberal Democrats’ proposed tax cut fails the fairness test.
“Spending £17 billion on increasing the personal allowance is a very poor way to help those on low incomes. It could actually harm the welfare of low-income households by increasing inequality and relative poverty.”
While debates about tax and spend will no doubt be animated at the Lib Dems’ conference in Birmingham, Left Foot Forward hopes that this factual analysis will assist the discussion.
• Download the report by clicking here.
135 Responses to “Lib Dem tax policy “fails the fairness test””
Liberal Conspiracy » Data abuse
[…] and so forth. There is a tendency to argue that policies that help such people are regressive, and should not be supported by left-wingers (this fictional couple would be, I think, in the seventh household income decile) [3]. That’s […]
Lib Dem tax policy: Our response to your responses | Left Foot Forward
[…] up Will’s offer to reply to some of the comments that have been posted in response – both on Left Foot Forward and on other sites, best summarised at Next Left or Liberal Democrat […]
Lib Dems: Our tax plans are fair and progressive | Left Foot Forward
[…] Member of Parliament for Inverness, Nairn, Badenoch and Strathspey. He writes in response to “Think again, Nick” by Tim Horton and Howard […]
LibLink: Danny Alexander on the party’s tax policies
[…] while back, Left Foot Forward ran a piece attacking the party’s tax policies for not being progressive. That results in many responses […]
FT Disagrees with the FT « Nick Thornsby's Blog
[…] is actually a bit of a rehash of a (quite misleading) debate that has been taking place on the Left Foot Forward blog, due to some wholly inadequate research […]