BNP in more trouble with election watchdog as figures reveal £83,932 advertising spend

Left Foot Forward

The BNP have until Friday to comply with Electoral Commission regulations on campaign spending or face the risk of prosecution.

The British National Party has been fined £500 by the Electoral Commission for submitting its accounts late, though a far bigger sanction hangs over its head – it faces a maximum penalty of prosecution for failing to give a “true and fair view” of its financial circumstances.

The Times says they have until Friday to produce further details, and quote BNP Deputy Leader Simon Darby’s justification for the “errors”, “if we had said we wanted to spend 10p, it wouldn’t do us any good. … there’s a bit of hyperbole with politics”.

The Electoral Commission, however, played down the possibility of prosecution as “media speculation”.

A spokesperson for the commission told Left Foot Forward:

“Prosecution is the most extreme punishment available. Our role is to make sure the system works well, to try and help parties with all aspects of compliance, to help them submit their accounts on time, and generally assist them.

“They £500 fine is for submitting a late statement of accounts. This is completely unrelated to the latter issue. They have until Friday to produce more details.”

On Tuesday, the commission published full details of party spending for last year’s European Elections. The figures show an increase in BNP spending of £54,030 from the 2004 European Elections, up from £228,813 to £282,843. When the breakdown is examined, however, some alarming figures come to rise.

Their spending on party political broadcasts more than doubled from £5,165 to £12,810 – with spending on advertising rising more than 25,000 per cent to £83,932 having been only £333 five years before. According to the BNP’s Election Return Invoices, downloaded from the Electoral Commission website, the papers which accepted BNP advertising in the 2009 European Elections are:


ESSEX
NORTH WEST

Basildon Recorder
Crewe Series
Braintree Weekly News Knutsford Guardian
Chelmsford Weekly News Leigh Journal
Clacton & Frinton Gazette Mid Cheshire Group
Colchester Weekly News Midweek Guardian
Echo Sale & Altrincham Messenger
Essex County Standard St Helens Star
Evening Gazette Stretford & Urmston Messenger
Halstead Gazette Warrington Guardian Series
Harwich & Manningtree Standard World Group
Maldon & Burnham Standard  
Southend Standard  
Thurrock Gazette  
Weekly News Brent & Bill  

Though the BNP failed to get a seat in the East of England, their success in North West England might lead the publishers of the ten North West newspapers that accepted their money to ponder how big an influence they played in Nick Griffin’s narrow win.

No related posts.

12 Responses to “BNP in more trouble with election watchdog as figures reveal £83,932 advertising spend”

  1. Shamik Das

    BNP in more trouble with Electoral Commission as new figures reveal 25,000% rise in ad spending since 2004: http://is.gd/5RhvT @leftfootfwd

  2. Chris Coltrane

    List of newspapers which took ad money from the BNP. Wonder if they're all owned by one proprietor? http://bit.ly/8MLrcH

  3. Carmen D'Cruz

    RT @chris_coltrane: List of newspapers which took ad money from the BNP. Wonder if they're all owned by one proprietor? http://bit.ly/8MLrcH

  4. Daniel Pitt

    New figures reveal BNP 25,000% rise in ad spending since 2004: http://is.gd/5RhvT #hopenothate #stopthebnp #fuckfascism

  5. British National Party Fined « ModernityBlog

    […] National Party Fined Left Foot Forward has an interesting piece on the BNP and their poor accounting […]

Comments are closed.