Daily Mail’s tax-dodge hypocrisy over Facebook ‘insult’

Newspaper accidentally calls for crackdown on itself

Mail 12 10 15


The Daily Mail is furious about Facebook’s flagrant tax evasion.

Today’s front page decries the social media giant’s ‘insult to taxpayers’, after reports Facebook paid a mere £4,327 in corporation tax in 2014.

Mail 12 10 15

Facebook paid staff huge bonuses of up to £210,000 each, allowing it to claim an accounting loss and pay less tax.

The company also channels its money through tax havens. As the Mail reports:

“Facebook is understood to funnel British profits through its international headquarters in Ireland to another organisation registered in the Channel Islands, a notorious tax haven.”

The rotters! The Mail adds:

“The revelation is an embarrassment to ministers, including George Osborne, who pledged to crack down on tax-dodging global firms.”

But will the story cause embarrassment to Daily Mail proprietor Jonathan Harmsworth, 4th Viscout Rothermere, who has long engaged in his own elaborate tax-dodging?

Viscount Rothermere

Rothermere inherited his father’s non-domicile status, which Private Eye reports he has used to channel hundreds of millions of pounds in dividends from the Daily Mail and General Trust (DMGT) through a company called Rothermere Continuation Ltd, registered in Bermuda, then back into a trust fund for himself and his family.

Will the chancellor include the DMGT in his ‘crackdown on tax-dodging global firms’?

As the Mail’s editorial ‘Status: tax dodger’ huffs:

“No wonder some are drawn to Jeremy Corbyn’s infantile Marxism. The sooner Mr Osborne’s crackdown takes effect, the better for the good name of capitalism.”



Like this article? Support our work: donate here.

Adam Barnett is a staff writer at Left Foot Forward. Follow MediaWatch on Twitter

Sign up for our weekly email by clicking here.

6 Responses to “Daily Mail’s tax-dodge hypocrisy over Facebook ‘insult’”

  1. Peem Birrell

    I agree that the Mail is hypocritical – but aren’t they all? Except possibly the Morning Star although it can be hypocritical in other ways as it doesn’t have much cash.
    But it occurred to me that if these employees who are paid the bonuses live in the UK (and from the article it seems they do) then the UK gets a bigger tax take from the bonuses than it would get from Corporation Tax on that money.

  2. Oscar

    The article scores a direct hit on Rothermere – bravo – but let’s not lose sight of the bigger story about Facebook (and Amazon and othes).

  3. blarg1987

    Not necessarily true, a good accountant will find away around it such, as deferring the bonus, or it being paid as a “loan”.

    Also, it is misdirection, while they may pay these people a bonus, the actual money being made in the UK is still being off shored, in essence they are not paying any tax on profits anyway.

  4. Eddy Boyband

    Talking of hypocrisy did this site get a intern to work for free ? I remember you were asking for some one not long after campaigning against interns working for free..

  5. Cole

    What relevance does that have? LFF isn’t aLabour blog (if it was it wouldn’t have articles by Greens and LibDems). And the Guardian isn’t always a Labour paper – it backed the LibDems in 2010.

Leave a Reply