The MoJ is one department that Osborne should keep cutting

The number of prisoners in England and Wales has almost doubled in the last 25 years



The Treasury’s autumn spending review is only weeks away, and George Osborne’s in-tray is likely to be full of pleas to spare key services the axe. The Howard League for Penal Reform’s submission is on the chancellor’s desk too, but we have asked him to do something quite different.

Be bolder. Go further. Cut more. Tell the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) to reduce the prison population by more than half – to its level during Margaret Thatcher’s premiership.

Mr Osborne asked departments whose budgets are not ring-fenced, including the MoJ, to submit plans to bring down spending by 25 and 40 per cent. In line with this request, the Howard League has put forward policy plans that would cut the prison population by 25 and 40 per cent respectively – while arguing that the government shouldn’t stop there.

The number of men, women and children in prisons in England and Wales has almost doubled in 25 years – from fewer than 45,000 in 1990 to almost 86,000 today. Reducing the prison population to its level under Thatcher would allow governors to improve prison conditions, which were described in July by the chief inspector of prisons as being at their worst in a decade.

So how do we achieve this? Here are some suggestions that, if enacted, would lead to changes so significant that dozens of jails could be closed:

Prohibit the use of short-term sentences (less than 12 months)

Short-term sentences are expensive and counter-productive, yet more than 57,000 people are sentenced to serve them each year. They are long enough to disrupt often already chaotic lives but too short to enable a person to begin to address the causes of their offending. A person with a job, home and family before they go into custody on a short sentence is unlikely to have them all on release.

Unsurprisingly, reoffending among short-sentenced prisoners is very high, creating further victims. MoJ research has concluded that suspended sentences and community sentences are not only cheaper, but also result in less reoffending.

Limit the use of remand

On any one day more than 8,000 people in prison have not been found guilty of an offence. A further 3,500 are awaiting sentence. Whilst remand may be needed when a person appears to be a danger to public safety and a flight risk, it is used far too often, particularly for those charged with misdemeanours. Seventy per cent of people remanded in custody by magistrates do not go on to receive a custodial sentence.

Reduce recalls to custody

The number of people who are in prison because they have been recalled to custody while serving their sentences in the community is 55 times greater than it was in 1993. Many people are recalled not for offences, but for technical breaches of their licence. Whilst these are not always trivial, they can almost always be dealt with in the community.

Use women’s centres in the community, not prisons

On any given day about 4,000 women are in prison, but only a very small number have committed serious violent offences and present a risk to the public. The overwhelming majority of women in prison have serious mental health problems and many are mothers, separated from their children.

Women’s centres are proven to be much more effective than prison in helping women change their lives and reducing reoffending. Ensuring women’s centres are properly funded and closing women’s prisons would result in huge savings.

Improve the effectiveness of the parole system

There are more people serving life and indeterminate sentences in England and Wales than in all of the other 46 countries in the Council of Europe combined. A large number of prisoners are serving more time in custody than intended because of delays in the parole system and a lack of access to work, education and courses that enable them to show they are ready for release.

Reduce the number of criminal offences

Between May 2010 and May 2014, 1,076 new criminal offences were created in England and Wales, about two-thirds of which carry potential prison sentences. The current habit of creating ever more offences and reasons to put people into the criminal justice system must be curbed.

Tackle sentence inflation

Over the last 10 years the average length of a prison sentence in England and Wales has increased by 24 per cent. For some offences, such as fraud and criminal damage and arson, average sentence lengths have increased by more than 50 per cent, but this trend has had no impact on reoffending rates.

Almost all other European countries have shorter average sentence lengths than England and Wales.

We have a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to sort out the bloated criminal justice system. We can cut crime and save the taxpayer billions. All that is needed is a little common sense.

Rob Preece works at the Howard League for Penal Reform. Follow him on Twitter

Want to read more posts like this? Then *sign-up to Look Left* and make sure you have the facts to rebut right-wing spin

2 Responses to “The MoJ is one department that Osborne should keep cutting”

  1. DoYerBangUp

    Agree with pretty much all of that. However, we really don’t want MoJ spending to fall commensurately with prison numbers. Each and every prison place is massively underfunded at present. Grayling’s ‘rehabilitation revolution’ is a sham; provision of purposeful activity – ie education and work – has fallen drastically over the past few years due in part to a sharp reduction in prison officer numbers. This in turn means even more ‘bang up’. The end result, aside from rising rates of violence and suicide – a human tragedy in itself – is that the prison system is churning out angry, frustrated, resentful and *unrehabilitated* ex-offenders who are far more likely to go on to reoffend. It is so short-sighted; if reducing government spending is your aim, take the unique opportunity to transform lives and break this endless cycle, for reoffending costs massively outweigh any MoJ savings. Think police costs, court costs, further (and longer) terms of imprisonment (circa £40K + per annum, per prisoner) etc, and that’s before we consider the dreadful human cost of crime.

    I would pay particular attention to the injustice of IPP sentences (now thankfully outlawed as an option for judges) – whereby prisoners are often kept inside years beyond their tariff. Also, sentences relating to drug crime need to be reviewed. There are plenty of young lads languishing in jail, becoming steadily more criminally hardened, for growing a bit of weed and so on. Having a prison record can make securing future employment obscenely difficult, resulting in guess what, more costs to the state (benefits payments etc).

    Last point: Grayling is an evil, spiteful, vindictive, thick-as-f@ck sh!thead – and good riddance. Cheers!

  2. UK Sports Bookies

    Really no matter if someone doesn’t know afterward its up to other viewers that
    they will assist, so here it taes place.

Leave a Reply