Defending employment rights must dominate the referendum conversation

We have EU membership to thank for many hard-won rights that we now take for granted



With a majority Conservative government that is slim and therefore vulnerable, and a government programme that a Guardian editorial this week described as ‘rag bag’, members in both Houses will be slaving away under the cosh of the chief whips.

Among the incoherent set of policies laid out in the Queen’s Speech, the referendum on an in/out membership of the European Union will dominate the conversation. Under pressure from his backbenchers and UKIP, Cameron caved in. He is relying on his ‘skills’ as a negotiator to come up with enough EU reforms that he can put to the country.

But no matter how many ‘reforms’ the prime minister may be able to secure traipsing around European capitals, they will never be enough for his many right-wing Eurosceptic MPs. For them, only full BREXIT will do.

With the stakes of this referendum so high, we can expect a ‘battle royal’ in both houses. Europe was the fault line of the 1992 Conservative government, with the party riven apart over the Maastricht Treaty.

Labour has to come out fighting for a Yes vote to stay in Europe. Whilst arguing for 16 and 17-year-old votes is important, Labour has to lay out for the British people why a No vote would be a disaster for jobs – especially in manufacturing – and for employment rights.

Despite the shenanigans on the Tory benches, Unite’s general secretary Len McCluskey has said that Unite will play its part in a genuine debate:

“Some of the most sensible rights for working people flow from our membership of the EU, much needed given the determination of this government to reduce further even the minor protections UK workers currently depend upon.”

Defending jobs and Europe-wide employment rights has to be uppermost in the discussions to come, and Labour has a big role to play.

As a delegate to the TUC Congress in the early 1980s, I well remember the late Ron Todd, former TGWU general secretary, telling us that ‘membership of the then EEC was the only  game in town’.

It was the European Commissioner Jacques Delors in the mid 1980s and his social chapter that persuaded many on the left who had regarded the EEC as the ‘bosses club’ to embrace membership. Ron had been impressed with Delors’ contention that completion of the Single European Market would be an opportunity to give it a social dimension.

Delors rapidly became a target for the Sun, who produced the infamous front page Up Yours Delors’. But Delors went on to preserve the European model of society with its emphasis on ‘close co-operation and solidarity as well as competition’.

Many of the workers’ rights we have today have their roots in that time. Now we need to bring that same level of commitment to the run up to the referendum.

EU membership has also given us the laws and legislation that have helped bring investment and decent jobs in manufacturing to the UK. Three and a half million jobs in the UK – that’s more than ten per cent in every region – and an estimated £30 billion of our economy (p.24) are a direct result of our membership of the EU. Two-thirds of manufacturing jobs in the UK are sustained by trade with the rest of the EU.

The economics make membership crucial, but so too does the protection that it gives workers. We have EU membership to thank for parental leave being extended to at least four months for each parent no matter what type of contract a worker may be on, and for laws which say part time workers can no longer be treated less favourably than their full time counterparts.

The list of rights goes on; the working time directive that protects workers from being forced to work more than 48 hours on average, with breaks during and between shifts; guaranteed paid annual leave of at least four weeks.

Meanwhile, major manufacturing companies have come out against a UK exit. Recently Airbus UK said that the company is based on a ‘model of European integration’ and promised to be more vocal in their support for stability and continued membership. Airbus said they believed an EU exit would mean significant changes to the regulatory and economic environment in which they operate, which may well impact on their competitiveness.

One of our leading engineering bodies has also pointed out that EU citizens currently working here as skilled engineers and scientists – who are adding to the success of the UK economy – would become foreigners in the event of an exit, possibly without the right to stay. And this is a two way street. We have many of our nationals (including Unite members) working in France, Italy, the Netherlands, Germany and beyond. Will there be repercussions?

As Unite’s assistant general secretary responsible for manufacturing, I am committed to our continuing membership of the EU. No matter how disappointed I still am that Labour lost the election, our union will fight hard for a Yes vote to defend jobs and to defend employment rights.

Tony Burke is assistant general secretary at UNITE

16 Responses to “Defending employment rights must dominate the referendum conversation”

  1. David Lindsay

    But if we needed the EU for these things, then there would be no point having a Labour Party.

    Employment rights are in any case negligible, so the CBI’s beloved EU is obviously as good as useless from that point of view. And any deal renegotiated by Cameron, the deal that would be the only option other than withdrawal on the referendum ballot paper, would remove even those which there already were.

  2. wj

    Ron Todd, along with Neil Kinnock, ran into Delors’ arms because the Labour party were unelectable in the 1980s – they used the EU to impose their agenda undemocratically on the people of the UK through the EU back door. Such is the squalid horse trading within the rotten EU set-up – Kinnock became a Commissioner and the EU increased its hold over British democracy.

    Airbus is outsourcing jobs from the UK to India – so no great loss there.
    It also makes no difference to Airbus whether the UK leaves the EU or stays in, Airbus can still deal with the single market and would still be subject to the same global regulations.

    I note that the 10 year old mantra of 3million jobs has now been upgraded to 3.5million – the same jobs that will still be there if we move to a EFTA/EEA single market style model.

    I also note in the piece that no mention is made of democracy (some union representative Tony Burke) – Tony Benn had the gist of it – “Britain’s continuing membership of the Community would mean the end of Britain
    as a completely self-governing nation and the end of our democratically elected Parliament as the supreme law making body in the United Kingdom.”

    Post Lisbon Treaty how true that has proved.

    was written in 1974 – and now, post Lisbon Treaty, how right he

  3. Cole

    If you think employment rights are ‘negligible’, just wait till we have a Tory government and are outside the EU. Or maybe look at what they have (or don’t have) in the U.S.

  4. woolfiesmiff

    This is total drivel, Germany only introduced the minimum wage in January this year and still 6 other EU countries don’t have NMW. The EU introduced the flexible working directive that directly lead to the rise in zero hour contracts. We don’t need the EU to establish workers rights.

    On foreign workers you seem to want to ignore all the talent that is working here from NON EU countries.

    The 3 and a half million jobs due to the EU is a complete utter and total lie. Provide one shred of evidence, where are all these jobs, who are they working for and why is it only the EU that makes this happen?

    Whilst the EU has been imploding 54% thats FIFTY FOUR Tony youth unemployment in Southern EU states whilst the UK has ADDED 2 million new jobs nearly ALL of them is SME’s that have no trade with EU at all

    So Unite seem to be of the opinion that the last Labour government in power for 13 years only allowed workers rights because the EU said so …. hmm ok Tony, if you say so….Burke by name I guess

  5. woolfiesmiff

    Why worry about the US ? What about the 6 EU countries that didn’t implement workers rights? I’ve seen nothing to suggest that any of these rights would be repealed when we are outside the EU.

  6. David Lindsay

    None of that has anything to do with the EU. It is what the Parliament of the United Kingdom and the British Labour Movement are for.

  7. Rick

    The EU is the capitalist boss’s club. It has allowed multinational corporations to import cheap labour to keep British workers wages low !!!

    Remember that Benn, Foot, Short, etc… all opposed British membership.

  8. Ian Young

    And many unions opposed membership as well. Like car workers unions. Except this time around they won’t because Europe likes the cars they make and Nissan don’t put factories in Sunderland to export to China. The reason car unions at British Leyland opposed the EU in the 1974 is because they knew no one in their right mind would buy their cars given a choice. And immigrants do not pay wages and neither is it the EU that opposes collective to maintain basic minimum wage norms across sectors. If a Romanian is paid Romanian wages in the UK that is not Brussels or Bucharest’s political choice to let that happen its Westminsters.

  9. Harold

    The Government will have to make it clear what they intend to do with employment laws, keep or disregard. If we exit the EU will the nation need to draw up a new list or start from the position of no employment protection? If Cameron only achieve giving away the employment rules we have now and puts that to a vote I will vote no. I have a colleague HGV driver who bitterly complains about the hours he is allowed to work each week. He claims it would be quite safe for him to drive 100 hours a week and it should be he who determines how long he stays at the wheel. One area which will need looking at if we vote for a free for all.

  10. Torybushhug

    Labours employment regs lead directly to the rise of ZHC’s. Only the customer determines what people are paid.

  11. Rick

    Another pro-EU Tory troll

  12. Ian Young

    No Rick its a coherent response to a two line conspiracy theory.

  13. gunnerbear

    Would the author care to answer a question or three; does he think sovereignty for law making should reside in the UK or abroad? Doe he want foreign judges to have total power over the UKs laws or UK politicians he and his members can vote out? Does the author want to control the number of immigrants currently allowed in to the UK – if he does, then that means he is automatically proposing we leave the EU as there will never, ever be any alteration to the right to freedom of movement.

  14. gunnerbear

    It’s a bit acerbic but I think this is rather good:

  15. gunnerbear

    There is this gem as well… (Apologies for the double post but my browser is playing up!)

  16. wj

    Many thanks – required reading I would suggest for some here, strange how the ‘Left’ have now become the lackeys of big business.

Leave a Reply