VAT is a regressive tax because the poorest end up paying more. And the Tories won't rule out an increase
Labour has launched a new poster campaign warning that a Conservative government could put up VAT. I’ve not actually heard the Tories say they will put up VAT but, as was recently reported by Left Foot Forward, back in October Tory Party chairman Grant Shapps refused on the Daily Politics to rule it out:
Jo Coburn: Are you ruling out a rise in VAT?
Grant Shapps: Well I have absolutely no intention of writing future Budgets on your programme…
– BBC Two: Daily Politics, 2 October, 2014
Nor did the Conservatives rule out putting up VAT prior to the 2010 election – and up in went as soon as they came to office. Thus Labour’s warnings are not without substance.
VAT is a regressive tax because the poorest sections of the population end up paying more as a percentage of their income than the well off – the proportion of an individual’s income taken by the tax falls as they move up the income scale. As the excellent Richard Murphy has written:
“VAT is intently regressive – meaning that the burden of the tax falls much more heavily on low earnings households than it does on those with higher income.”
Even the Office for National Statistics has pointed out that direct taxes are progressive whereas indirect taxes (such as VAT)…
“Have the opposite effect to direct taxes taking a higher proportion of income from those with lower incomes, that is, they are regressive.”
Which means that Labour’s campaign poster is not as scaremongery as it looks at first glance. Or at least it isn’t as scary as an increase in VAT, a very real (and very regressive) possibility under the Tories.
James Bloodworth is the editor of Left Foot Forward. Follow him on Twitter
Leave a Reply