Poll shows public want new legal rights over privatisation

Half of all respondents think there is too much outsourcing to the private sector

East Coast ncr

 

New polling has shown that the majority of people would like to see new laws on transparency and accountability in public service contracts. In addition, most people do not support the current trend (£) towards outsourcing of public services to the private sector.

The polling, carried out by Survation for campaign group We Own It found that 68 per cent of respondents believe the public should have a legal right to be consulted and given access to information on the outsourcing of public services. This belief was particularly strong among Labour and UKIP voters.

Half of all respondents are against the current outsourcing trend and would like to see more public services continuing to run in-house. Only 22 per cent of respondents – less than a quarter – would like to see more outsourcing of public services to the private sector.

Cat Hobbs, director of We Own It, said:

“Government hands over our public services to private providers under the veil of ‘commercial confidentiality’ – it’s old fashioned and undemocratic. We don’t know what’s been agreed in our name and with our public money.

“The people affected by public service sell-offs and contracts – whether it’s the East Coast line, the National Gallery or local council care services – want to have a say. We need a Public Service Users Bill for transparency and accountability, to put the public interest ahead of vested corporate interests.” 

The new polling comes after it was revealed last week that the NHS had agreed to the ‘biggest-ever privatisation’ of its services  in an attempt to deal with the growing backlog of patients waiting for surgery and tests in UK hospitals. This has given 11 profit-making companies £780 million to deliver heart, joint and other types of operations, and perform scans, X-rays and other diagnostic tests on patients.

A Public Service Users Bill would mean that the public would have been consulted over this decision, and the option of keeping the services in-house would be considered. Furthermore the public would have access to information about the contracts and performance as well as relevant financial data.

Meanwhile, a report by the TUC out earlier this month has shown that outsourcing to the private sector is having a negative impact on service users and staff. For example, it found evidence for a higher incidence of hospital infections following the outsourcing of cleaning to private companies, and that private prisons are more likely to be overcrowded.

In line with public opinion Early Day Motion 438 in support of the Public Service Users Bill has had cross-party support and been signed by nearly 100 MPs. This week We Own It is launching a list of ‘champions for public service users’ who support the Bill on its website.

Ruby Stockham is a staff writer at Left Foot Forward. Follow her on Twitter

8 Responses to “Poll shows public want new legal rights over privatisation”

  1. JoeDM

    And the biggest outsourcer was the last Labour Government through the dreadful PFI schemes.

  2. Leon Wolfeson

    So you then immediately join the article’s mistake of confusing outsourcing for privatisation. Well done.

    At least with proper privatisation, companies have to take a risk. With the “outsourcing” model used by this government, which has been much bigger, if they can’t make sufficient cash they just hand it back (after asset-stripping) and walk away.

  3. Chris Kitcher

    If there is no privatisation policy then there is no use for the rotten Tories. They only sell national assets to keep their paymasters happy and we, the public, loose out.

  4. Leon Wolfeson

    It’s served them well to keep the NHS technically public while farming out services via zero-risk-to-companies “outsourcing”. The risk has been entirely to the taxpayer ><

  5. janlog

    Too damned right – how many times have they out of the blue given away stuff that the majority of us disagree with? They tried it with forests and seemingly failed – bet they managed to do it anyway. rotal Mail, Lloyds bank, East Coast rail (this one opposed by all political hues but they did it anyway).

    If they cannot be trusted to have our best interests at heart then their powers need to be reduced.

  6. Leon Wolfeson

    Actually, that’s a case for having services run by non-profit or mutuals, regulated by but not run by the government. Far harder for tinkering to occur.

  7. Chris Kitcher

    Just typical of the vile Tories. No shame at all.

  8. Leon Wolfeson

    Well yes, but my point is that something not technically “privatised” can still be effectively so.

    And that technical “privatisation” to a non-profit or mutual, at arms-length can be harder for the government to fiddle with! Let’s focus on actual effects and not the semantics 🙂

Leave a Reply