The Green Party's leader put forward her views on education, pay and the NHS in a live debate with young voters.
The Green Party’s leader put forward her views on education, pay and the NHS in a live debate with young voters
Last night Green Party leader Natalie Bennett was the first politician to appear on Leaders Live, a new debate series that gives young people the chance to put questions directly to leaders.
Broadcast live on YouTube, the series is created by Bite the Ballot, an organisation that empowers young people to make informed voting decisions.
Bennett’s appearance was significant as she has been omitted from the BBC’s scheduled debates that will mark the run up to the general election.
You can watch the full debate here.
The questions that the audience asked Bennett showed that jobs and education are at the top of their list of worries.
When asked who she proposed would cover the cost of the free higher education the Greens have promised, Bennett pointed to rich individuals and multinational companies who do not pay their taxes.
She stressed that there is a need for society to be “rebalanced” and that multinationals need to take responsibility for contributing towards society.
The issue of equality also informs the Greens’ policy on drugs.
Bennett was adamant that drugs “should be treated as a health issue, not a criminal justice issue”, and said that the amount of discretion given to police means that more people from minority backgrounds are arrested for drug misuse than people from other backgrounds.
This, she said, is despite the fact that more privileged people are no less likely to be using drugs.
Bennett also pledged to end zero-hours contracts, and stated that her party was “absolutely opposed” to unpaid internships. Alongside workers who currently receive a minimum wage, interns, she said, should be paid the Living Wage as a minimum.
The NHS was also a key issue in the debate. Bennett warned that the UK is ‘racing towards’ an American style privatised health system, and criticised the private finance initiatives (PFI) which are holding the NHS hostage with huge interest rates and service charges.
Campaign group Drop the NHS Debt estimate that by 2020-21, the annual costs of the 118 NHS PFIs will be £2.14bn. Saving 46 per cent of that would release about £1bn a year.
As part of the Greens’ plans for the NHS, Bennett promised that more detail on mental healthcare would be added to their manifesto. She criticised the way that mental health problems are regarded as less urgent than physical ones, and pledged parity of esteem for people with mental illness.
On education, Bennett said that no school run by a faith group should receive government money. She predicted that in the event of this becoming legislation, many faith schools would choose to come into the secular system rather than become private.
The school system also face criticism from the Green leader over its competitive nature. Bennett said that the system should be based on cooperation, and shold include a more practical curriculum covering things like relationships, health and nutrition, in order to give pupils an “education for life”.
Ruby Stockham is a staff writer at Left Foot Forward. Follow her on Twitter
49 Responses to “Natalie Bennett: We have to ban zero-hours contracts”
damon
What should the minimum hours be then?
What if the agency doesn’t have the work?
Will you be allowed to call up an agency to see if they have any extra work for you to supplement your other job?
Zero hours contracts are alright when there’s work there.
I was getting 40 hours most of the time recently.
JohnRich
There are many workers who find the flexibility of zero hours contracts very convenient.
blarg1987
A minimum number of hours can be worked out, based on overall average of company hours.
I agree flexible working arrangements can benefit both parties but it is the misuse of these things that needs to be rectified.
My view is that if employers expect staff to be on call then they should pay a retainer as it can disrupt peoples days for example last thing you would want is to arrange to go out with friends just to get a call saying to get to work as they need you.
Paul Markham
One has to remember that Natalie can promise anything she chooses. As she will never get the power to deliver nor have to worry about how to pay for the measures.
Also companies would love to do away with zero hour contacts, employ more people and give wage rises. Problem is that without demand, sales and profits rising. They can’t.
And if the economy does climb rapidly, there will be more migrants coming to enjoy the UK’s economy.
As for not paying taxes, not sure where she lives. Not the UK, because Ed should of replied to Myleene, “If that’s bottled water it is taxed, as is the glass, the table, chair,clothes you wear, etc.” In the UK everything but food, children’s clothing and few other items are taxed. Some are taxed very high.
So taxing the rich with their high spending, means losing the taxes collected on purchases and the jobs in the retail sector. Without losing some of the rich people all together.
Is she referring to companies avoiding paying corporation taxes? Good luck with that, companies can register in many EU countries and do.
As I said, she can promise to stop the rain if she gets a majority in Parliament.
uglyfatbloke
There are jobs where it is normal to hire people by the day and where that is the only practical arrangement for both workers and employers, though I’m not sure if that is really the same as a zero-hours contract. Bennett is certainly right about drugs. Cannabis should have been legalised and taxed decades ago – and would have been if it was n’t for fear of the Daily Mail.